Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚽️ فــوت طنـــز 😂

Channel

⚽️ فــوت طنـــز 😂

@Foottnz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,137subscribers

+849 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151133576
TypeChannel
Username@Foottnz
Description**﷽** ⚽جامع ترین و کامل ترین چنل اخبار روز جهان ورزش🔥 🔥 اخبار داغ 🎥 ویدیوهای وایرال 📊 آمار و حواشی 🌍 فوتبال اروپا و جهان 💢 ما در قبال تبلیغات هیچ مسؤلیتی نداریم 💢
CreatedBetween 1 September 2018 and 30 April 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Foottnz

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 8 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Futball180TV/11078110 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC@Foottnz/191841 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC0.9572 minutes
@Futball180TV/10489128 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC@Foottnz/185439 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC0.954.5 hours
@Futball180TV/1052601 Sept 2026, 10:33 UTC@Foottnz/185780 · this entry1 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC0.957 minutes
@Futball180TV/1104265 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC@Foottnz/191417 · this entry5 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC0.9440 minutes
@Futball180TV/1031208 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC@Foottnz/184019 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC0.9410 minutes
@Futball180TV/10499629 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC@Foottnz/185524 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC0.948 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Futball180TV9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9372 minutes@Futball180TV (9–0)
@AloSportNews7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.932.1 hoursthis entry (4–3)
@varzesh_3i7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.944 minutes@varzesh_3i (5–2)
@Hattric_Official6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9640 minutes@Hattric_Official (6–0)
@ninesport95 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9524 minutes@ninesport9 (5–0)
@FUTBALLI185 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.971.9 hours@FUTBALLI18 (5–0)
@footballisport5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9370 minutes@footballisport (4–1)
@FootballShort5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.934.3 hoursthis entry (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 38 of the 38 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 519 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

14,99219,11917,055.517,1377 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net +849. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,373–19,738 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 16:1817,137-55
10 Nov 2026, 13:0817,192-48
8 Nov 2026, 23:5617,240-44
7 Nov 2026, 12:5817,284-39
6 Nov 2026, 15:0717,323-61
5 Nov 2026, 12:2717,384-43
4 Nov 2026, 09:1817,427-35
3 Nov 2026, 06:3517,462-41
2 Nov 2026, 03:1717,503-23
1 Nov 2026, 01:4917,526-32
31 Oct 2026, 03:2617,558-41
30 Oct 2026, 06:4917,599-39
29 Oct 2026, 09:3117,638-47
28 Oct 2026, 07:4817,685-43
27 Oct 2026, 07:0617,728+13
26 Oct 2026, 06:1217,715-56
25 Oct 2026, 03:4817,771-28
24 Oct 2026, 06:2817,799-77
23 Oct 2026, 04:3017,876-48
22 Oct 2026, 03:0517,924first reading

Engagement

1,251 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.77%
avg views ÷ 17,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
475
385 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
385
of 1,251 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 249 of 385 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held1,251 (6 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total182,960
Reactions total2,073
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 05:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈60,100
Videos
≈15,600
Links
≈592

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 04m
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 235 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,467 reactions across 645 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,60429.3%
🤣1,03318.9%
🔥5329.73%
💩4588.38%
😁4047.39%
👍3205.85%
💔2785.09%
👎2043.73%
🖕1723.15%
👏1512.76%
😍641.17%
🤬530.969%
🤮520.951%
😐500.915%
😢280.512%
🗿190.348%
🍌180.329%
😱100.183%
🎉50.091%
💅40.073%
3 further kinds80.146%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 663 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,467 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 385 posts held from the last 30 days (5.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 05:01 UTC35 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

📆 برنامه مسابقات امروز 22 آبان + پخش زنده 🇸🇦🇰🇷 دیدار دوستانه فوتبال / عربستان - کره جنوبی / ساعت 18 🇦🇺🇶🇦 دیدار دوستانه فوتبال / قطر - استرالیا / ساعت 18:15 🇬🇷🇳🇱 لیگ ملت‌های اروپا / هلند - یونان / ساعت 23:15 🇩🇪🇷🇸 لیگ ملت‌های اروپا / صربستان - آلمان / ساعت 23:15 ✔️@Foottnz

12 Nov 2026, 22:23 UTC249 viewsread 13 November 2026

بتفیدو یک سایت بین المللی و خارجی با بهترین آفرها برای شماست🔔⚡️ https://t.me/BetFido

12 Nov 2026, 22:23 UTC262 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🔹 ۷ میلیون شرط، بیش از ۳.۵ میلیون تومن سود احتمالی! 💵⚽️ یه نبرد جذاب دیگه توی لیگ ملت‌های اروپا! 🔥 🔥 توی این پیش‌بینی، برد هلند با ضریب ۱.۵۱ انتخاب شده؛ یعنی با یه شرط ۷ میلیون تومنی، در صورت برد هلند، مبلغ۱۰ میلیون و ۵۷۰ هزار تومن به حساب برمی‌گرده! 💰 یعنی ۳ میلیون و ۵۷۰ هزار تومن سود خالص! فقط در صورتی که پیش‌بینی درست از آب دربیاد. ⚡️ تازه توی بت‌فیدو قابلیت کش‌اوت هم داری؛ یعنی می‌تونی قبل از سوت پایان، با مب…

12 Nov 2026, 22:21 UTC286 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

📊🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇭🇷جود بلینگام در برابر کرواسی: ⚪️۱ پاس گل ⚪️۱ موقعیت بزرگ خلق‌شده ⚪️۲ پاس کلیدی ⚪️۲ پاس بلند ⚪️۴۶ پاس ⚪️۲ شوت ⚪️۶۷ لمس توپ ⚪️۸ دوئل موفق ✔️@Foottnz

❤3

12 Nov 2026, 22:11 UTC332 views3 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🇪🇸43 بازی بدون شکست🔥 ✔️@Foottnz

❤3

12 Nov 2026, 21:52 UTC412 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🚨🇫🇷🤍حضور امباپه امشب تو استادیوم سن سیرو ✔️@Foottnz

12 Nov 2026, 21:51 UTC420 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 تیم ملی انگلیس به دور یک‌چهارم نهایی صعود کرد ✔️@Foottnz

12 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC414 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

▶️ پایان بازی | 🇪🇺 لیگ ملتهای اروپا 🇮🇹ایتالیا3⃣🆚1⃣فرانسه🇫🇷 🇭🇷 کرواسی1⃣🆚2⃣انگلیس 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇪🇸 اسپانیا2⃣🆚0⃣جمهوری چک 🇨🇿 ✔️@Foottnz

12 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC442 views5 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🇫🇷زیدان داره به دستیارش میگه حاجی این تیمه چرا رونالدو، مارسلو نداره ✔️@Foottnz

😁4🤮1

12 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC478 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

یه زمانی جانشین بوفون بود الان تو 5 بازی اخیر 3 تا پاس گل به حریف داده! 🔥 ✔️@Foottnz

😁4🔥3

12 Nov 2026, 21:23 UTC480 viewsread 13 November 2026

🇮🇹گل سوم ایتالیا به فرانسه توسط اسپوزیتو² در دقیقه 75

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,251 posts we hold for @Foottnz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Foottnz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

توییت طور | Twite tor
@Twitetorx · 18,577
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 October 2026
پرسپولیسی ها
@pers_polis · 39,206
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚽️ فــوت طنـــز 😂” (@Foottnz), 17,137 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Foottnz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.