5 measurements spanning 20 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 646–657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 17:04
656
+2
21 Aug 2026, 04:08
654
+3
15 Aug 2026, 00:16
651
+4
8 Aug 2026, 02:47
647
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:09
647
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 656 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
9 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
782
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
17
60.7%
❤
10
35.7%
😍
1
3.57%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔 Не понимаю, работает или нет
Это один из самых частых вопросов в уходе за волосами, потому что многие начинают оценивать результат слишком рано, хотя цикл роста волос устроен так, что изменения появляются постепенно.
Волосы не могут стать гуще за неделю, потому что сначала должен стабилизироваться процесс выпадения, затем фолликулы переходят в фазу роста, и только после этого появляется новый волос, который со вр…
💁 Правда или миф: силиконы всегда вредят волосам
Силиконы — один из самых обсуждаемых компонентов в уходе за волосами. Их часто называют «вредными», но такое обобщение некорректно: действие силиконов зависит от их типа, концентрации, формулы средства, состояния волос и качества очищения.
☝️На практике многие силиконы выполняют защитную и кондиционирующую функцию: помогают уменьшать трение, делают волосы более гладк…
🌿Вы используете розмарин для роста волос неправильно
Сейчас в интернете тысячи советов: заварите розмарин, сделайте отвар, ополаскивайте волосы и ждите результат.
Но проблема в том, что домашние отвары содержат непредсказуемое количество активных веществ. Сегодня концентрация одна, завтра другая. Кроме того, многие полезные компоненты розмарина просто не переходят в воду в нужном количестве или быстро теряют активн…
✔️До — после: комплексный уход против выпадения волос
Результаты пациента, прошедшего курс микроигольчатого RF-лифтинга по волосистой части головы в клинике, а также применявшего лосьон FOLLIMED с Капиксилом дома.
Лосьон FOLLIMED усиливает эффект процедур, укрепляя корни, снижая воспаление и препятствуя выпадению.
👩⚕️Врач: дерматовенеролог, врач-косметолог, трихолог, Черненко Оксана
#Отзывы #ДоПосле
🔜 follimed…
💐Любите наращивание ресниц? Тогда важно поддерживать свои
Наращивание помогает быстро получить выразительный взгляд, но постоянная нагрузка на натуральные ресницы может постепенно сказываться на их состоянии.
Вес искусственных ресниц, клей и регулярное снятие могут приводить к тому, что свои ресницы становятся:
🌟более тонкими
🌟менее плотными
🌟хрупкими и ослабленными
Чтобы сохранить красоту натуральных ресниц, важн…
🎞️Сухая кожа или перхоть: почему важно не перепутать эти состояния
Очень многие начинают использовать шампуни от перхоти при любом шелушении кожи головы, хотя проблема далеко не всегда связана с грибком, и именно поэтому средства могут не помогать или даже усиливать дискомфорт.
Если у вас сухая и чувствительная кожа головы, чаще всего вы замечаете:
🌟мелкие сухие белые чешуйки
🌟ощущение стянутости после мытья
🌟чувст…
🔥3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Follimed_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOLLIMED” (@Follimed_official), 656 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Follimed_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.