Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Volkism vs Modernity

Channel

Volkism vs Modernity

@Folkish_Paganism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,083subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002060008531
TypeChannel
Username@Folkish_Paganism
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Folkish_Paganism

Growth

2,0752,0832,0796 August 2026 — 2,076 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,075 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,080 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,082 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,083 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,074–2,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:282,083+1
12 Aug 2026, 13:232,082+2
9 Aug 2026, 17:222,080+5
6 Aug 2026, 18:402,075-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:322,076first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.5%
avg views ÷ 2,083 subscribers
Avg views / post
343
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (31 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total6,518
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

106 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5450.9%
👍5249.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Pagan_RevivalismPhoto

There is no great hero without a great adversary. A momentous achievement can only be so atop a mountain of failed attempts. When you encounter such in your time, know they're not unreachable, not untouchable, not invincible. This is a time for heroes and heroines, great and small. You, of all your forebearers, were chosen to be here in the midst of modernity; because you alone have the strength to overcome the great

2

6 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC225 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9👍3

5 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC141 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AryanpaganismPhoto

What makes music White? Most people know what genres appeal to Whites and what genres don’t, but it’s one of those things you feel, yet can’t explain. At least as someone who has never studied music I can’t put it into words. Of course, a leftist would argue that it’s just culture and Blacks would absolutely love Beethoven if they grew up listening to his works instead of rap, but we know that there are inherent dif

👍62

5 Aug 2026, 22:39 UTC198 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @USSRwasChristianPhoto

Stalin's gravitation toward Catholicism As internal Cheka files have already revealed, Stalin had been reversing the anti-clerical policies of Trotsky since the mid-30s, so it naturally followed that after the reopening of the Orthodox churches during the war, he had decided to engage in peace talks with the Vatican— 𝐑𝐞𝐯. 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐮𝐬 𝐎𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐤𝐢: "Do you think that cooperation with the Holy Father, Pope Pius XII, in

5 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC313 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Japs and Chinese are the most obedient of all goyim proven by the BA boycott

👍3

4 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC236 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐄𝐄𝐃 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐀 𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐂 𝐁𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐒 𝐈𝐍 𝐌𝐄𝐓𝐀𝐏𝐇𝐘𝐒𝐈𝐂𝐒 "Jesus Christ and Mary are dead as deities today, just as Phoebus, Apollo and Thor once died. As a salvation from this new Twilight of the Gods, the Germanic value structure remains as a granite basis for a later metaphysical design. Our race will have to be content with this; just as all truly great times of struggle could not at the same time be times of self-absorbed m

👍3

3 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC227 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AryanpaganismPhoto

The weapon challenge One of the most ancient and inspiring elements of many tales of old is the weapon challenge. Basically, a hero obtains a weapon if he’s strong enough to get it. Often the challenge is presented by an older relative (usually a parent) or at the very least it used to belong to a relative (usually the father), so there’s an idea of the older generation empowering the younger if the latter is worthy

13

2 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC322 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

By the way, it’s always women who sell out the hardest. Men have a much harder time with this, though many Reddit fags manage, women still outnumber them. Because they have always been NPCs. In a traditional society where they are controlled by men women are good mothers, but in modern society where women are controlled by jews they are the worst of all golems.

👍7

2 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC381 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I once almost had a good job but couldn’t hide my power level enough. Won’t go into detail, but it was a nice White collar office gig (filled with women) and my power level failed me. I was so fucking disgusted I had to do something and left. A successful person aka a wanna be jew would just take it, get drunk at home to forget and be back next day. That’s why I can’t stand White golems more than any other thing in t

9👍1

2 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC326 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If this channel ever starts selling something (subscriptions, shirts, books etc) I’ve been hacked and you should leave

👍86

2 Aug 2026, 21:36 UTC455 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Success is jewish In a world created and run by jews the only way to be successful for a non-jew is to emulate the master race as much as possible, ideally to the point where they let you interbreed with them (e.g. Trump). That’s why honorable Aryan men are all basement incels. Our morals and principles hold us back. We can’t grift, exploit and lie, we can’t be good shills. When I see a motherfucker who’s supposedly

7👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Folkish_Paganism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 80,243 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Volkism vs Modernity” (@Folkish_Paganism), 2,083 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Folkish_Paganism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.