Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Volkish Aryan Pagan

@AryanPaganismChannel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,712subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001677624418
TypeChannel
Username@AryanPaganismChannel
Created1 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AryanPaganismChannel

Growth

5,7075,7185,712.56 August 2026 — 5,718 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,714 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,707 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,712 subscribers5,7126 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,705–5,720 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:435,712+5
9 Aug 2026, 17:425,707-7
7 Aug 2026, 00:025,714-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:325,718first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 5,712 subscribers
Avg views / post
601
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total13,826
Reactions total363
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

363 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26773.6%
👍9626.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC230 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dragonchaservoicePhoto

The Nibelungs: Siegfried (1924)

12

11 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC210 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ColeWolfsson

“So you think there’s a bunch of storm Gods” Let’s pretend that isn’t a disingenuous way to describe the Gods, sure why not? Is there a monopoly on elements that can be used? Let’s get deeper “Storm God” is a brutal simplification of a divine character. Thor in the eddas has very few elements connecting him with storms besides his name. Also, will you say the myths of Zeus and Thor are the same? No? So how are they t

13

10 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC315 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @GaelGaulGermanic

The post above is something I am always worried about, grifters nosing their way into Paganism. They are nothing but Christians, trying to repackage our beliefs and then calling it their idea.

👍14

10 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC259 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Folkish_PaganismPhoto

The Paganist Yet another grifter The Paganist is an average Pagan channel promoting right-wing ideas which sounds good, but as it turns out the it’s run by an open atheist. Vinnie Sullivan has been around for a while and runs a few channels. Middle aged right wing creators are a dime a dozen and he never stood out. But at some point Vinnie saw Pagans in his chat and realized that there’s an untapped market to explor

👍5

9 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈1,010 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

17👍8

8 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC384 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AryanpaganismPhoto

Happy cat day For the next few days I’ll write on cats in myth, fairy tales and folklore

28👍1

6 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC649 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Folkish_PaganismPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

25👍12

5 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC594 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Folkish_PaganismPhoto

Former porn actor and an infidel. Stallone is just like those born again christian moms.

👍25

4 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC474 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @Pagan_RevivalismPhoto

Foreign faiths have no authority over ancestral faiths, only the Gods and ancestors of that particular ethno-religion do. And the best way to find out what actual ancestral faith is, is to read the legends of said ancestral faith. It's really that easy.

20👍2

3 Aug 2026, 23:23 UTC487 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AryanpaganismPhoto

The weapon challenge One of the most ancient and inspiring elements of many tales of old is the weapon challenge. Basically, a hero obtains a weapon if he’s strong enough to get it. Often the challenge is presented by an older relative (usually a parent) or at the very least it used to belong to a relative (usually the father), so there’s an idea of the older generation empowering the younger if the latter is worthy

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AryanPaganismChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 113,367 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Volkish Aryan Pagan” (@AryanPaganismChannel), 5,712 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AryanPaganismChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.