Channel
@FluenceEnglish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
607subscribers
+57 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004206174960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FluenceEnglish |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FluenceEnglish |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 607 | +55 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 552 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:15 | 550 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (27 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,604 |
| Reactions total | 63 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
151 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 91 | 60.3% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 17.9% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 8.61% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 7.95% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“Would you mind opening the window?” What is the BEST response if you agree?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Which sentence is correct?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Imagine someone asks: “Are you coming with us?” Which pitch movement would normally make it sound like a genuine Yes/No question?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2👏2😢2
Which sentence is most likely to sound like the speaker is thinking before answering?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
A: “I really enjoy working in the morning.” B: “_____! I get much more done before noon.” Which response works best?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
Read the conversation carefully: A: “You don't like coffee, do you?” B: “Actually, I love it!” What is B doing?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
📌 ملاحظة مهمة: إذا كنت تجد صعوبة في الكتابة باللغة الإنجليزية أو لا تعرف كيف تبدأ صياغة الجمل والفقرات، فهذا يعني أنك بحاجة إلى أساس واضح وتدريب منظم. ولهذا أقدّم ضمن محاضراتي شرحًا عمليًا يساعدك على بناء أساس قوي في الكتابة باللغة الإنجليزية والكتابة الأكاديمية بسرعة، من تكوين الجملة إلى كتابة الفقرات بشكل صحيح ومنظم. في الفترة القادمة سيتم الاعلان عن التسجيل الجديد في دورة تطوير مهارات اللغة الانكليزية وخصوصا لل…
❤9💯3
كيف تبدأ الكتابة باللغة الإنجليزية حتى لو كانت مفرداتك محدودة؟ كثير من متعلمي اللغة الإنجليزية يعتقدون أنهم لا يستطيعون الكتابة لأن مفرداتهم ليست كثيرة أو لأنهم لا يعرفون جميع القواعد. لكن الحقيقة هي أن الكتابة لا تحتاج إلى أن تبدأ بمفردات صعبة، بل تحتاج إلى أن تبدأ بما تعرفه الآن. أولًا: لا تنتظر حتى تصبح مفرداتك كثيرة من أكبر الأخطاء أن تقول: "سأبدأ الكتابة عندما أتعلم كلمات أكثر." إذا كنت تعرف كلمات بسيطة، فأنت ت…
❤5🔥1
📌 كرر المراجعة على فترات. ومع الوقت ستلاحظ أن الكلمات والقواعد أصبحت تبقى في ذاكرتك لفترة أطول، والأهم من ذلك أنك أصبحت تستطيع استخدامها بسهولة أثناء التحدث والكتابة.
👏11❤2
🧠 مشكلة الحفظ وضعف الذاكرة عند متعلمي اللغة الإنجليزية كثير من متعلمي اللغة الإنجليزية يقولون: "أحفظ الكلمات اليوم، وبعد يومين أنساها!" "أحفظ القاعدة وأفهمها، لكن عندما أحتاجها لا أتذكرها!" لكن في معظم الحالات، المشكلة ليست أن لديك ذاكرة ضعيفة، بل أن طريقة الحفظ نفسها غير فعالة. تعلم اللغة لا يعتمد على أن تقرأ المعلومة أو تكررها عشرات المرات فقط، بل يعتمد على طريقة تخزينها واسترجاعها واستخدامها. أولاً: لماذا ننسى ا…
🔥6❤4💯1
File, posted without a caption
❤6🔥4😢1
قبل أيام... دار بيني وبين أحد الطلاب هذا الحوار: الطالب: أستاذ، هل يوجد فيديو مدته 5 دقائق يلخص هذا الكتاب؟ ابتسمت وقلت له: ولماذا تريد أن تختصر كتابًا كُتب في مئات الصفحات إلى خمس دقائق؟ صمت قليلًا، ثم قال: "لأنني لا أحب القراءة." وهنا أدركت أن المشكلة ليست في اللغة الإنجليزية... بل في علاقتنا مع القراءة نفسها. للأسف، أصبح كثير من متعلمي اللغة الإنجليزية يبحثون دائمًا عن الطريق الأقصر: فيديو مدته دقيقة. منشور من خم…
👏14❤11🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @FluenceEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
“Would you mind opening the window?” What is the BEST response if you agree?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which sentence is correct?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Imagine someone asks: “Are you coming with us?” Which pitch movement would normally make it sound like a genuine Yes/No question?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which sentence is most likely to sound like the speaker is thinking before answering?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A: “I really enjoy working in the morning.” B: “_____! I get much more done before noon.” Which response works best?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Read the conversation carefully: A: “You don't like coffee, do you?” B: “Actually, I love it!” What is B doing?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fluence English Academy” (@FluenceEnglish), 607 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FluenceEnglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.