Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⌗ .𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗘𝗧 𝗦𝗨𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗧 ᝰ.ᐟ

Channel

⌗ .𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗘𝗧 𝗦𝗨𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗧 ᝰ.ᐟ

@FloodZhongli_0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002090888040
TypeChannel
Username@FloodZhongli_0
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FloodZhongli_0

Growth

116119117.59 August 2026 — 118 subscribers9 August 2026 — 118 subscribers17 August 2026 — 119 subscribers1 September 2026 — 117 subscribers11 September 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 12:58116-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:55117-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:08119+1
9 Aug 2026, 04:32118no change
9 Aug 2026, 02:00118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥440.0%
💋330.0%
🔥220.0%
🤩110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 11:08 UTC72 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› У нашего проекта новый аккаунт ТТ https://www.tiktok.com/@kaizer_275?_r=1&_t=ZS-96lPUKOsp41༢ ₊ ➢ #Tiktok •

22 May 2026, 08:55 UTC121 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› Всех приветствую,из новостей,Сейчас проект в активном поиске участников и адсинистрации,говорю сразу сейчас бот не работает,те кто хотят вступить пишите сразу мне в лс,мой юз указан рядом с ботом,если не може найти напишите в комментариях тут. ༢ ₊ ➢ #𝐒𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥𝐏𝘰𝘴𝘵 •

3 May 2026, 20:29 UTC126 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ››к сожалению но сегодня алый закат унёс за собой 4 неприкаянных души Кли скарамучча Бутхилл авантюрин ༢ ₊ ➢ #чистка •

💋2

29 Apr 2026, 12:47 UTC113 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› Теперь каждую пятницу будет проходить Анон день,так что всех кто хочет поучаствовать ждем по пятницам в наших анонах ༢ ₊ ➢ #𝐒𝘩𝘪𝘦𝘭𝘥𝐏𝘰𝘴𝘵 •

25 Apr 2026, 23:35 UTC110 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❌ ⧼🎀⧽ . . .🎀𝑒𝑤 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑜𝑛 💋 ' 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🕳𝐀 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘪𝘻𝘰𝘯, 🕳𝐃𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘶𝘦, 🕳𝐓𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘥𝘭𝘺 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 🕳𝐓𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘴𝘴 ⎯꯭۫❨❨‌ 𝗧𝗛𝕰 𝗪𝕺𝗟𝗙 𝗣𝗔𝕮𝗞 ❨❨‌ 🎀ife @Lifewf_pk 🎀nfo @Infowf_pk 💋 ' @Rofcom Мᴏᴩᴄᴋᴀя ʙᴏᴧнᴀ удᴀᴩяᴧᴀᴄь ᴏ бᴇᴩᴇᴦ, И ᴨᴧяж ᴋᴀʍᴇниᴄᴛый ᴛᴇᴩᴨᴇᴧ ϶ᴛу бᴏᴧь. Нᴇ нужнᴏ ᴇʍу чᴇᴧᴏʙᴇчᴇᴄᴋих дᴇнᴇᴦ, О ᴄинᴇᴇ ʍᴏᴩᴇ, ᴏᴛдᴏхнуᴛь ʍнᴇ ᴨᴏɜʙᴏᴧь. И я, ᴄʍᴏᴛᴩя ʙдᴀᴧь, нᴀ чᴇᴩᴛу ᴦᴏᴩ

❤‍🔥1🔥1🤩1

25 Apr 2026, 16:31 UTC74 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› нуууу,тут какой-то вау истории нет,просто в моменте подготовке нью эры Блейд скидывает 3 названий,и говорит мол я не могу определить какое больше нравится ,помогите,разумеется это было в адм.группе,ну,в целом почти единогласно была выбрано новое название,которое носим по сей день ༢ ₊ ➢ #Anon •

25 Apr 2026, 10:19 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 -🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› Ути как мило🤩🤩🤩 ладно,так уж и быть,буду поменьше вас банить ༢ ₊ ➢ #Anon •

💋1

25 Apr 2026, 10:03 UTC61 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› Ой,если честно,то все таки мало но активных,я думаю всем приятнее когда общаются а не молчат как мёртвые души ༢ ₊ ➢ #Anon •

25 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕭𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐄 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› да я чёт не рассчитал что будут обои которые за меня волнуются, виноват признаю. Если коротко я пытался заняться личной жизнью , но пошло все как обычно через одно место и меня отшили.༢ ₊ ➢ #Anon •

🔥1

25 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕻𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐍𝐎𝐍 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› ༢ сказать на 100 процентов не могу касаемо администрации,вопрос поднимался,и я думаю ещё поднимется неоднократно. а касаемо участников да,мы всегда рады участникам,как раз недавно прилично так потеряли на чистке ₊ ➢ #Anon •

25 Apr 2026, 09:19 UTC49 viewsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕭𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐄 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› не могу точно сказать,т.к не получал их особо.༢ ₊ ➢ #Anon •

25 Apr 2026, 09:18 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

˓ ♱ ₊ 𝕭𝐋𝐀𝐃𝐄 - 🤩 ꒱ › › ──────────────── ›› да я чуть- чуть в дипресии был и даже с кровати вставать не хотел, а фаенон у меня давно).༢ ₊ ➢ #Anon •

❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FloodZhongli_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⌗ .𝗦𝗖𝗔𝗥𝗟𝗘𝗧 𝗦𝗨𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗧 ᝰ.ᐟ” (@FloodZhongli_0), 116 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FloodZhongli_0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.