WIPка одного ооочень спящего манула Манулы уже были и сейчас делаю для них ещё допы... тяжко даётся. Возможно уже теряю хватку с предугадыванием того, что хотят от меня заказчики
❤19🔥4❤🔥1💘1

Channel
@FlamingBlacksmith
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
247subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002252596704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FlamingBlacksmith |
| Description | Озвучка, скетчи, арты, мысли... всё то, что связано со мной - Элигосом Hipolink - https://hipolink.net/flaming_eligos VK - https://vk.com/flaming_eligos Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/flaming_eligos X-ter - https://x.com/flaming_eligos |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FlamingBlacksmith |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 247 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 247 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 May 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,787 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
484 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 196 | 40.5% | |
| 🔥 | 134 | 27.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 57 | 11.8% | |
| 🎉 | 42 | 8.68% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 3.31% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 2.07% | |
| 👀 | 9 | 1.86% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.826% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.826% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.413% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.413% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.413% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.207% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.207% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.207% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 484reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
WIPка одного ооочень спящего манула Манулы уже были и сейчас делаю для них ещё допы... тяжко даётся. Возможно уже теряю хватку с предугадыванием того, что хотят от меня заказчики
❤19🔥4❤🔥1💘1
Кастомные ассеты карт для игры Balatro, сделанные на заказ для Неуракса Интересный, однако, вышел опыт с подобными графическими заменами уже в готовую игру. Будто бы попрактиковался для дальнейших игровых модов... а ещё валеты здесь заменены на мэйдочек Кто изображён на картах по порядку: 1. ПИКИ - Мэйд aikamakii - Дама AniNeurax (доп. персонаж) - Король AniNeurax (основа) 2. КРЕСТИ - Мэйд YumoKoval - Дама by_rei…
🔥18❤10❤🔥5💘1💯1
Увидела Вилина диковинку в виде подвески на курсор, хватила меня за плащ и захотела себе такое же... ну и вот Пока что работа остаётся на стадии WIP из-за небольшой неопределённости с курсорами
💯14🔥8❤🔥3👏2
Эксперимент №1 Подвеска на курсоры По сути, у подвески могут быть разные доп. анимации: - при кратко- и долговременном афк - нажатии (не прокрутке) по колесу мыши - резком перемещении из стороны в сторону Работает подвеска через отдельный EXE-шник и в нём можно настроить: - размер подвески - размер текущего курсора - длину верёвки - положение привязки верёвки к курсору - работу в фоновом режиме Для пробы даже приш…
❤21🔥13❤🔥5
...я совсем не чувствую себя отдохнувшим Ничего не помогает. Ни прогулки, ни игры, ни общение, ни киновечера, ни "посидеть в тишине и разрядиться на полную". За время отпуска ещё и надумал себе всякого разного... Не умею я отдыхать и видимо уже не научусь. Только и остаётся быть удобным инструментом в руках других личностей Днём начну проводить свои ещё давно запланированные эксперименты на момент потенциальных поз…
❤16😢10🙏4
Постримил... блин... головоломку с котиками Мои первые 100 единовременных зрителей на одной трансляции! Запомню этот момент на крайне долгое время. Жаль только, что сервера твич решили испортить окончание стрима своей нестабильностью... Раз такое дело, то походу я как стример реально что-то да стою хотя, это была уже глубокая нооочь~... меня зарейдили две большие стримерские шииишки~... много кто из зрителей к этом…
🔥15❤6👀2❤🔥1
Подарочные курсоры для MsVulpes от анонимного пользователя сети интернет Поздравляю с днём рождения!
🔥23❤7❤🔥4
Это был их Последний Заезд... Отвлекалась от рутины, играя в игрулечки В ролях нового форсажа на заводе участвовали @dubs0354 @FlamingBlacksmith @unpudenpu
❤11❤🔥4🔥1🤓1
Советую всем погонять на погрузчике по складу, где разлита кислота вместе с горящей нефтью, что вскипает от пола! (а ещё пока вы довезёте грузы до конвейера - обчихаетесь раз двести)
🔥4👀2⚡1❤1❤🔥1
✅ Гештальт с закрытием Forza Horizon 5 на 100% выполнен Это оказалось даже легче, чем с четвёртой частью... Даже как-то жаль, что это произошло настолько быстро. Ну а другой стороны, пятая часть более слабая по атмосфере в сравнении с прошлой. Не так ярко закрепится в памяти, но некоторые из достижений были довольно занятными (к примеру режим с прятками и все связанные с ним достижения) Дальше на очереди уже свежая…
❤10❤🔥4🔥3
С днём рождения, Пылающий кузнец
🎉42❤11🍾2❤🔥1
Скажу ещё пару слов отдельно от последней работы... С этого момента начинается мой отпуск от заказов. Планирую от них отлучиться примерно на 3-4 недельки, но если мой денежный запас иссякнет раньше, то вернусь досрочно Совсем из сети мне уже не пропасть никогда, так что буду отдавать накопленный материал по озвучке + хочу провести пару экспериментов с потенциально возможными новыми позициями прайс-листа. По вашему д…
❤19❤🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FlamingBlacksmith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 158,559 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FlamingBlacksmith named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пылающий Кузнец” (@FlamingBlacksmith), 247 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FlamingBlacksmith.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.