Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рыбалка Молдова

@Fishing_MD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002147558944
TypeChannel
Username@Fishing_MD
CreatedBetween 1 April 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Fishing_MD

Growth

208 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:3120no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:4920first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 28 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
19
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 24s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1935.8%
🔥1426.4%
😁59.43%
😭47.55%
🥰47.55%
🤯35.66%
23.77%
😢11.89%
😱11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2025 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 21:15 UTC62 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @gontagheorghe

Asta-i ediția emisiunii Gonța Media cu participarea dlui Ilia Trombițki. Vă mulțumesc! https://youtu.be/k8LtLD8SOlA?si=8iRX430mw6FX8yJg

18 Mar 2026, 10:01 UTC75 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdprotestPhoto

1️⃣2️⃣⚡️ Посол Украины сообщил, что в Днестр попали "комбинированные нефтепродукты", "нефтепродукты от взорвавшихся ракет". Исходя из слов Посла, в Днестре могут находиться крайне токсичные и опасные для жизни химические элементы из ракетного топлива. «10 марта было установлено, что речь идёт о 1,5 тоннах комбинированных нефтепродуктов. Это нефтепродукты от взорвавшихся ракет и утечки нефтепродуктов, накопившиеся и

16 Mar 2026, 14:15 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @most_dnestrPhoto

☣️ Эколог Илья Тромбицкий: источник загрязнения Днестра до сих пор неизвестен У молдавских специалистов до сих пор нет точных данных о том, каким именно веществом вызвано загрязнение Днестра. Об этом МОСТу рассказал эколог, исполнительный директор Международной ассоциации хранителей реки Днестр Eco-TIRAS, доктор биологических наук Илья Тромбицкий. По его словам, есть только несколько гипотез, которые проверяются:

👍2

3 Feb 2026, 09:09 UTC70 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdprotestVideo

💬 Запасы воды в Днестровском водохранилище остаются ниже нормы, несмотря на более снежную зиму, сообщил эколог Илья Тромбицкий. 📊 Сейчас уровень воды около 113 м при обычных 117–118 м; для нормального восполнения он должен достигнуть 121 м. 🏭 Плохое состояние очистных сооружений усугубляет загрязнение Днестра: на многих объектах отсутствует биологическая очистка, что приводит к значительному органическому загрязнен

😭4

23 Jul 2025, 06:26 UTC102 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdprotestVideo

🔴 Уровень воды в Днестре достиг исторического минимума, побив антирекорд прошлого года. ⚫️ По словам директора Приднестровского гидрометцентра Виталия Кольвенко, это самый низкий уровень за 150 лет наблюдений. Специалисты предупреждают: река может обмелеть ещё сильнее.

21 Jul 2025, 15:11 UTC96 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @most_dnestrPhoto

❗️В Днестре зафиксирован новый антирекорд уровня воды в районе Григориополя. Уровень воды в Днестре в районе Григориополя достиг исторического минимума. Об этом сообщил эколог Виталий Кольвенко на своей странице в Facebook. «В Григориополе уже сейчас абсолютный антирекорд уровня в Днестре достигнут. Это даёт основания предполагать, что в ближайшие дни аналогичный рекорд может быть установлен и в Бендерах, и в Тирас

🤯32

8 Jul 2025, 07:52 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdprotestPhoto

🤛 Днестру грозит новый рекорд маловодности, сообщает эколог Илья Тромбицкий.

😢1

4 Jul 2025, 20:54 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Кто был на днях на Днестре, что там с уровнем?

👍1🔥1

4 Jul 2025, 20:54 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @mdprotestVideo

🤛 В июне Днестр упал на 3 м. 🔴 Ещё 15 см — и будет побит антирекорд июля 2024 года. ⚫️ Дно зарастает и заиливается из-зи слабого течения, река превращается в болото, сообщил главный метеоролог Приднестровья Виталий Кольвенко.

🔥2😱1

29 May 2025, 11:16 UTC223 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Простой вариант инлайн монтажа. Юра Лесовский с канала Salmo @Fishing_MD

👍3

29 May 2025, 08:57 UTC225 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Виды червей и как их правильно насаживать. Юра Лесовский с канала Salmo @Fishing_MD

🥰3👍1

28 May 2025, 14:30 UTC187 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Но после теста, на точку с Bunello, зашли карпы, прогнали плотвень и поймались в количестве 6-7 штук. Правда весом в 100-150г) @Fishing_MD

🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Fishing_MD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 999,246 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рыбалка Молдова” (@Fishing_MD), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fishing_MD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.