Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 「ꪀꪖkι l𐔖᥎ᥱr'᥉」

Channel

「ꪀꪖkι l𐔖᥎ᥱr'᥉」

@Fischlsoulmate

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

80subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004452956203
TypeChannel
Username@Fischlsoulmate
Descriptionзаходя в этот канал - вы подтверждаете что все шипы в данном канале канон. 𝗛𝗲𝘄!! Я Наки - селфшиппер и надеюсь мы подружимся. Я очень активно веду канал!!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
On Telegramt.me/Fischlsoulmate

Previous handles

@Fischlsoulmate was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@NakiFischlKanon
held 11 August 202611 August 2026

Growth

498064.511 August 2026 — 49 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49 subscribers19 August 2026 — 56 subscribers27 August 2026 — 68 subscribers17 September 2026 — 80 subscribers17 September 2026 — 80 subscribers11 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 04:2280no change
17 Sept 2026, 03:4780+12
27 Aug 2026, 05:2668+12
19 Aug 2026, 16:0456+7
12 Aug 2026, 01:5749no change
11 Aug 2026, 20:4649first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
90.6%
avg views ÷ 80 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.5
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
32.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held30 (30 July 202616 September 2026)
Views total797
Reactions total257
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
152
Videos
10
Links
13

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

395 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52267985257523202906015.2%
custom 52267665711956416115614.2%
custom 52494529664102363655012.7%
custom 5249478873652961829369.11%
custom 5408920686884333397317.85%
custom 5348175323739486247307.59%
custom 5348295853406711615256.33%
💘215.32%
custom 5265237293345575881205.06%
🎉194.81%
😈133.29%
custom 5429275902699676146112.78%
custom 5413619724703539687102.53%
🍓82.03%
😭51.27%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 30 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fischlsoulmate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2026, 07:52 UTC31 views30 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🥹 Я ВАЛЯЮСЬ, ВЫ ТОЛЬКО ПОСМОТРИТЕ КАКАЯ ОНА ПРЕКРАСНАЯ, Я ЕЕ ОЧЕНЬ ЛЮБЛЮ! Она как-будто официальная!! ВЫ НЕ ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЕТЕ КАКАЯ ОНА КАЧЕСТВЕННАЯ. у нее еще подставка с озом такая прелестная, блин я ее люблю с ног до головы! Можно я буду смотреть вечно только на нее... Я реально готова сидеть часами и глядеть на эту малышку. 🤩🤩reacts please🥹 #мерч 🤩🤩🤩

custom 52494788736529618299custom 52267985257523202908custom 52267665711956416117custom 53481753237394862473custom 53482958534067116152custom 52494529664102363651

15 Sept 2026, 03:19 UTC33 views20 reactions1 Starread 17 September 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🥹 1488 дней мы уже вместе с любимой. А точнее, 4 года 26 дней. Я вообще в шоке, что у меня настолько долгий гиперфикс. Иногда да, я забывала про фишль и отдыхала от нее, но это для того чтобы не стать слишком зависимой. Обычно мои "гиперфиксы" держаться не долго, неделю макс. Но с фишль другая история, я ее уже по факту не могу отпустить потому что она заняла в моей жизни слишком много. И я ее люблю и не хочу о

custom 52267665711956416116custom 52267985257523202906custom 53481753237394862474custom 52494788736529618292custom 52494529664102363651custom 53482958534067116151

14 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC43 views30 reactions1 Starread 17 September 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🥹 ГЛУПЫЕ ЧИИКАВЫ НАШЛИ!! Они такие смешные блин и глупые блин блин если бы нашли были бы в мире чиикавы, то они бы были кошечками ! 🌟 🤩🤩reacts please🥹 #другое #арт 🤩🤩🤩 спасибо за звезду 🥺🥺

custom 522676657119564161111custom 52494788736529618297custom 52267985257523202906custom 52494529664102363652custom 53481753237394862472custom 53482958534067116152

14 Sept 2026, 05:27 UTC45 views27 reactions13 Starsread 17 September 2026
Photo

ВЫ ПОСМОТРИТЕ ЧТО МНЕ СДЕЛАЛИ!!! Какая красота, я не могу🐦‍⬛🐦‍⬛🐦‍⬛ cr : @inlovewithrodionraskolnikov #другое 13 ЗВЕЗД ВЫ ЧЕ

custom 524945296641023636510custom 52267985257523202906custom 53482958534067116156custom 52267665711956416112custom 52494788736529618292custom 53481753237394862471

12 Sept 2026, 15:48 UTC63 views9 reactions1 Starread 17 September 2026

ПОЧЕМУ ВЫ ЗВЕЗДЫ МНЕ СТАВИТЕ Я КРАСНЕЮ 🕸️

custom 52494529664102363656custom 53482958534067116152custom 52267985257523202901

12 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC64 views26 reactions2 Starsread 17 September 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🥹 простите за такой маленький актив!!!!! Будут будут посты и тд.. просто времени никак нет, мне грустна🤩🤩 . Постараюсь побыстрее что-нибудь вам накалякать, а пока что смотрите на ногти, которые оформлены под фишль 🤩🤩 🤩🤩reacts please🥹 #другое 🤩🤩🤩

custom 524947887365296182911custom 52267665711956416116custom 52267985257523202906custom 52494529664102363651custom 53481753237394862471custom 53482958534067116151

11 Sept 2026, 02:53 UTC78 views20 reactions1 Starread 17 September 2026
Forwarded from @aniseabPhoto

Трейд с @fischlsoulmate 🫸🫷 Архив | щитпост | коммишки

custom 53481753237394862477custom 52267665711956416116custom 52267985257523202904custom 52494529664102363651custom 52494788736529618291custom 53482958534067116151

9 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC105 views23 reactionsread 17 September 2026

в общем, у меня второй юме, вы если хотите саппать только Нашлей, саппайте только их!! А если вы хотите саппать только тсухиро, то также только их. Но если вы оба хотите саппать, то я буду рада этому 💗 по поводу даблов, если вы саппаете нашлей, то прошу не упоминать даблов с фишль, а с тсукасой мне нейтрально, поэтому даблов касы можете саппать спокойно. Плюсом я понимаю что даблов с тсукасой много и всем хочется поб

custom 524945296641023636510custom 52267665711956416115custom 52267985257523202905custom 53482958534067116152custom 53481753237394862471

9 Sept 2026, 01:54 UTC99 views9 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Forwarded from @tsukasagirlfriendPhoto

🔹сукаса ❤️🥹 Любовь моей жизни.. 🥹Бесконечный поток любви и счастья вы можете найти в этом канале. 𝗦𝗲𝗹𝗳𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 - 𝗹𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝘀𝘂𝗸𝗮𝘀𝗮'𝘀 🎀ы найдете в данном канале.. 🥹Арты 🥹Видео 🥹Интерактивы 🥹Мерч 🥹все находится тут🥹 🥹 вп 🥹 мьюсапп 🥹 навигация 🥹 другая инфа 🥹 первый канал 🥹

custom 52267985257523202904custom 53481753237394862473custom 52267665711956416112

6 Sept 2026, 16:18 UTC114 views28 reactionsread 17 September 2026

я щас лежу и плачу от осознания какие вы все хорошие. Как вас я люблю 🥺🥺🥺 вы такие нежные и прекрасные 🌟🌟🌟 я бы вас обняла каждого 😢😢

custom 524945296641023636512custom 52267665711956416118custom 53481753237394862475custom 52267985257523202901custom 52494788736529618291custom 53482958534067116151

6 Sept 2026, 08:52 UTC122 views35 reactions2 Starsread 17 September 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🤩🤩🤩🤩🥹 🎀🤩 new post 🎀🎀 пф, оформила пост наконец-то. Я безумно рада мерчу, нянянянянчннянянянчннянянян они такие красивые все блин блинский🤩🤩!!!!!!! 🤩🤩reacts please🥹 #щп #мерч #другое 🤩🤩🤩 спасибо за звезды!!!

custom 522679852575232029013custom 53482958534067116157custom 52494529664102363656custom 52267665711956416113custom 52494788736529618293custom 53481753237394862473

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Fischlsoulmate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTCFinal Results18 voters

что хотите

  1. лор пиши нашлей ирл50%
  2. еще алнст даа наоки яндере61%
  3. пиши там из секая юнами или тайайю11%
  4. сталкер + яндере ( в коммы выберите с каким шипом)22%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“「ꪀꪖkι l𐔖᥎ᥱr'᥉」” (@Fischlsoulmate), 80 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fischlsoulmate.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.