Channel
@Fingram_RD_volontery
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003429311117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fingram_RD_volontery |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fingram_RD_volontery |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 125 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 120 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 121 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 124 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 124 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
115 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 42.6% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 27.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5199782627409683064 | 8 | 6.96% | |
| custom 5278370693451361415 | 4 | 3.48% | |
| custom 5970001251495056050 | 4 | 3.48% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.61% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| custom 5235984722064061263 | 1 | 0.87% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
0️⃣1️⃣2️⃣Легкие деньги могут стоить слишком дорого «Продай банковскую карту — получишь несколько тысяч». Звучит заманчиво? Такая «легкая подработка» может обернуться серьезными последствиями. Передавая карту или реквизиты третьим лицам, вы не знаете, для чего их используют. А если счет становится инструментом незаконной деятельности, отвечать за последствия можете именно вы. ❗️ Последствия могут быть крайне серьез…
В каждом из нас живет свой финансовый кот🥰 Узнали себя? Пишите в комментариях, какой из них Ваш?👇 ❤️ — тык тык, если попали в точку
❤3🥰2
ФинГрам_РД pinned a video
🤔Откуда берутся деньги сегодня? Продолжаем акцию «Экономика на родных языках» 😏СЕГОДНЯ СРАЗУ НА 2 ЯЗЫКАХ ДАГЕСТАНА 🎤О наличной (выпуск банкнот и монет Банком России) и безналичной (возникаемой в процессе кредитования) эмиссии 📹Ролики на других языках можно посмотреть выше
❤8🔥5👍4🥰1
📊 Понравился такой формат? Оставьте любую реакцию — это поможет понять, стоит ли продолжать рубрику. 💵❤️ Сделали: Х.Б и З.З
❤5👍3🔥1
ВАРИАНТЫ 💡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4👍2custom 51997826274096830641
Я показываю, сколько стоит одна валюта в единицах другой. Меня используют каждый день: в банках, обменниках, на бирже Кто я?
❤4
ВАРИАНТЫ 🫧
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3👍1
Я отражаю, насколько сильно меняется цена за определённый период. Бываю спокойной или резкой, но всегда показываю колебания. Кто я?
❤4
Родителям школьников на заметку Чтобы не стрессовать от внезапных мыслей о начале учебного года (и не бегать в мыле на последней неделе августа), лучше готовиться заранее. Предлагаем вливаться постепенно, без фанатизма — почитайте, как собрать ребенка в школу и не тратить лишнего. ❤️, если начало положено
❤4👍3custom 51997826274096830642
💳 Ликвидность: почему одни активы можно продать за минуту, а другие - месяцами? Ликвидность - это способность актива быстро превратиться в деньги без существенной потери его стоимости. 📢 Чем выше ликвидность, тем проще продать актив по рыночной цене. Например: 🔹наличные деньги обладают абсолютной ликвидностью; 🔹акции крупных компаний также считаются высоколиквидными, поскольку ежедневно обращаются на бирже; 🔹недви…
❤4👍1custom 51997826274096830641custom 52783706934513614151
🗝️ ставка составляет 1️⃣4️⃣% 1️⃣В июне ускорился рост цен на топливо, овощи, фрукты и связь. Особенно заметным оказался рост цен на бензин, из-за чего выросли инфляционные ожидания: топливо — важный ориентир для населения и бизнеса, а его удорожание повышает и стоимость перевозок, что может привести к росту цен на другие товары. 2️⃣Из-за этого Банк России повысил прогноз инфляции на 2026 год до 6–7%. 3️⃣Несмотря н…
👍3custom 51997826274096830641custom 52359847220640612631custom 59700012514950560501
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fingram_RD_volontery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ВАРИАНТЫ 💡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ВАРИАНТЫ 🫧
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто такой страхователь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что такое страховой случай?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФинГрам_РД” (@Fingram_RD_volontery), 125 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fingram_RD_volontery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.