Channel
@Fikers_watch_list
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002181635261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fikers_watch_list |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fikers_watch_list |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 114 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 113 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 115 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 114 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 111 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 111 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 12.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fikers_watch_list. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Doctor sleep (2019) the idea: 10/10 execution of the idea: 10/10 cinematography: 10/10 plot: 10/10 characters: 10/10 character development: 10/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: yes zone: golden over all: 10/10 Need yall to lock in rq and make ur lives better. First watch The Shining then come back and watch this, i watched the directors cut for this cuz that was wt i was told to do and holy did i enjoy it. The DC …
🔥3
Signed yuta
Evil dead burn (2026) the idea: 10/10 execution of the idea: 10/10 cinematography: 10/10 plot: 10/10 characters: 10/10 character development: 10/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: nah zone: green/grey over all: 10/10 Lmao pure comedy ts was funny it's random ash and ntn serious about it they made it just cuz😭. it's labeled horror cuz of the visuals probably enji ntn i would consider scary, lota blood tho ik some of…
Signed yuta
Brothers (2009) the idea: 7/10 execution of the idea: 8/10 cinematography: basic plot: 5/10 characters: 8/10 character development: 8/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: no zone: green over all: 7.5/10 I was confused on why they would cast toby on this cuz i couldn't take him seriously but it made sense eventually, also genius poster with the whole section line n everything. Anyways the story was alright the actors m…
Signed yuta
companion (2025) the idea: 5/10 execution of the idea: 6/10 cinematography: basic plot: 7/10 characters: 7/10 character development: 6/10 actors: 8/10 would i rewatch: no zone: yellow over all: 6.3/10 nothing fancy but good enough to watch one time and thats about it. it's not boring fs but kinda reduce ur expectations after u get the plot it becomes kinda meh cuz they limited everything to one specific setting. w…
Signed yuta
inside job (2021) idk how to rate this using the ratings i usually do, breaking down each aspect and rating them individually wouldn't really work here so i'll just give you the general idea of it. i have a problem of binge watching a show if its good and i cleared the first season in one siting. season 1 is 10 episodes season 2 is 8, i think it got discontinued now tho. anyways it's a witty scifi heavy on"what if …
Signed yuta
The king of comedy (1982) the idea: 10/10 execution of the idea: 10/10 cinematography: basic plot: 10/10 characters: 10/10 character development: 10/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: yes zone: red over all: 10/10 I kinda regret putting this off as much as i did (i think i got it recommended lowkey last year😭) the whole "comedy" Thing didn't really seem appealing to me to watch it fr so i just kept it in my list. Fo…
Signed yuta
Cure (1997) the idea: 10/10 execution of the idea: 10/10 cinematography: 10/10 plot: 10/10 characters: 10/10 character development: 10/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: absolutely zone: golden over all: 10/10 This was wayyyyy ahead of its time in every aspect. It's one of those movies that practically demands a rewatch once you reach the ending and realize what it's really abt and you'll happily watch it again. B…
Signed yuta
Btw I'm gonna stop linking movies on the titles (the actual files) cuz i stopped downloading files (shout out phono) but if yall used to use that let me know
Signed yuta
Valkyrie (2008) the idea: true story execution of the idea: 10/10 cinematography: basic plot: 9/10 characters: 10/10 character development: 10/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: yes zone: green over all: 9.8/10 Clean to the point no complexity and peak accuracy, i didn't know about this coup attempt on hitler till i saw this (i think dude faced like 15 or 20 of them not sure). Btw what's with tom Cruise always look…
👍2
Signed yuta
The Babadook (2014) the idea: 9/10 execution of the idea: 4/10 cinematography: 5/10 plot: 4/10 characters: 5/10 character development: 4/10 actors: 10/10 would i rewatch: no zone: green over all: 5.9/10 Honestly the actors saved it this was whacky for stn labled horror plus they couldn't even pick a specific sub genre for it and just kept switching. mediocre but watchable i expected soooo many jump scares cuz more…
Signed yuta
I, Robot (2004) the idea: 6/10 execution of the idea: 8/10 cinematography: 10/10 plot: 7/10 characters: 8/10 character development: 5/10 actors: 7/10 would i rewatch: yes zone: green over all: 7.2/10 Every time will smith is mentioned the first movie dad talks about is this lmao, i watched it so many times tbh and they used to spam the hell out of it on mbc2 and fox movies. I randomly decided to rewatch it cuz of …
Signed yuta
Lady Bird (2017) the idea: 10/10 execution of the idea: 10/10 cinematography: 9/10 plot: 8/10 characters: 9/10 character development: 10/10 actors: 8.5/10 would i rewatch: no zone: green over all: 9.3/10 Was looking for something short and stumbled on this, probably the most realistic coming of age movie i saw in a while. U dont really get to see a complex mother daughter dynamics portrayed this good mostly but th…
Signed yuta
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fikers_watch_list. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“welp.” (@Fikers_watch_list), 114 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fikers_watch_list.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.