Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ་ 𝓞𝓞3 : 𝐹𝘦𝘭𝘪𝒄𝘪𝘢 .

Channel

་ 𝓞𝓞3 : 𝐹𝘦𝘭𝘪𝒄𝘪𝘢 .

@Feli_LAMP

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

31subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003519549345
TypeChannel
Username@Feli_LAMP
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Feli_LAMP

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

303331.59 August 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31 subscribers10 September 2026 — 30 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31 subscribers2 October 2026 — 33 subscribers12 October 2026 — 31 subscribers319 August 202612 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 64 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 16:1831-2
2 Oct 2026, 22:5933+2
17 Sept 2026, 13:1731+1
10 Sept 2026, 00:3930-1
31 Aug 2026, 07:1931+1
11 Aug 2026, 03:4730no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:3230first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2537.3%
custom 53910594383186738862232.8%
custom 61905277088128100911014.9%
🍓57.46%
🕊34.48%
❤‍🔥11.49%
💘11.49%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC26 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Сколько же от него шумихи... С одной стороны радовало, что тот, кажется, не особо понимает в какой ситуации находится, и лишний раз шумихи никто не наводит, а с другой... ощущалось ещё абсурднее, чем она предполагала. Но могло быть и хуже. — Какая... честь. Ответила та почти через стиснутые зубы. Но сейчас не до этого. — Не сказала бы, что я знаю. Тебе, вроде, должны были что-то выделить. Но раз уж такое дело, ск…

custom 53910594383186738863❤2

3 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC21 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Как бы иронично всё не выглядело, третья максимально пыталась держать всё под контролем. Сейчас паникёрство совсем ни к месту, так что нужно было угомонить "актёра" пока он прямо здесь не устроил трагедию. — Никто шкуры не сдирает. Думаю, если бы это действительно было кому-то нужно, от нас всех бы и мокрого места не осталось. Понимаешь о чём я? А насчёт него... Фелиция вновь бросила взгляд на Ируму. — Он должен п…

❤3custom 53910594383186738862💘1

3 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC22 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Выдох. Похоже, разговор будет не из лёгких. Конечно, было бы неплохо попросить понизить тон вновь, но и этот не так сильно тарабанил по ушам. Так что... нет нужды. — Можешь звать меня Фелиция. Не сказала бы, что тут люди, что подобны тебе. Ну, может, лишь в какой-то степени. К твоему сожалению, это совсем не место для выступлений. Выдох. Мусор был почти убран. было бы не плохо обработать раны четвёртому... Но на э…

custom 53910594383186738862❤1custom 61905277088128100911

3 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC21 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

... В комнате четвёртого, как оказалось, было... не совсем чисто. Не то чтобы Фелиция была как-то удивлена, ведь сам характер Ирумы говорил сам за себя. В общем, от таких идеала не дождёшься. Фантики, различные упаковки от всякой дряни... впервые она видела столько мусора. — Жуть. Внезапно, скрип двери. В моменте заключённая подумала, что это была Мичи. Однако, её догадка быстро рассеялась резким голосом. "Трина…

❤5

3 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC10 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Тихо. Даже слишком. Уже привычно. Ничего такого не происходит. Но это ведь и к лучшему? Никаких нервотрёпок и передряг. Чего-то такого, что подняло бы огромную шумиху. Только чьи-то отдалённые шаги. Не к ней в камеру ... Или...? 🥬🥬🥬🥬 ❌❌❌❌❌❌🥬🥬🥬🥬 ❌🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ❌❌Стук. Не очень громкий, но он смог раздаться эхом по камере. ❌❌❌❌Раздражает. — Обязательно приходить име…

❤4

6 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

С днём рождения, Риннэ. 🙋‍♀️

🍓2custom 53910594383186738861

29 Jun 2026, 15:26 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

хотя, возможно, если второй уверяет, что у него запаха гнили нет, то это может быть и от четвёртого. почём знать, почём знать.

❤4custom 53910594383186738861custom 61905277088128100911

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Feli_LAMP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“་ 𝓞𝓞3 : 𝐹𝘦𝘭𝘪𝒄𝘪𝘢 .” (@Feli_LAMP), 31 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Feli_LAMP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.