Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Feedback/Отзывы о нас

@Feedbackboges

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

116subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002375138381
TypeChannel
Username@Feedbackboges
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Feedbackboges

Growth

113116114.56 August 2026 — 113 subscribers9 August 2026 — 113 subscribers13 August 2026 — 116 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:26116+3
9 Aug 2026, 06:16113no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:55113first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Apr 2026, 08:21 UTCviews —

Feedback/Отзывы о нас pinned «Теперь отзывы будут в комментариях тут чтобы было честно и т.д •Пожалуйста оставляйте отзыв с фото •Пишите пожалуйста даже негативные комментарии если вам что то не понравилось это поможет нам стать лучше •Описывайте более подробно это поможет нашим будущим…»

6 Apr 2026, 08:16 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 9 August 2026

Теперь отзывы будут в комментариях тут чтобы было честно и т.д •Пожалуйста оставляйте отзыв с фото •Пишите пожалуйста даже негативные комментарии если вам что то не понравилось это поможет нам стать лучше •Описывайте более подробно это поможет нашим будущим клиентам понять как работать с нами Удаление комментариев причины •Спам •Без доказательный отзыв •Отзыв клиентов чс [Нарушение правил проекта если вы в чс ,

4 Apr 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,460 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

афигенный рюкзак, супер качество , привезли быстро , топ сервис , буду еще заказывать

3 Apr 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всё пришло. Абсолютно всем доволен. Всё на высшем уровне! По срокам тоже всё чётко! Огромная благодарность проекту за их деятельность!!!

31 Mar 2026, 13:23 UTC830 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все доехало в сроки, бугису спасибо

21 Mar 2026, 07:14 UTC812 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

заказываю в 3 раз как всегда все супер, буду брать еще

8 Mar 2026, 22:42 UTC788 viewsread 9 August 2026

первый раз заказывал логистикой из китая поэтому сори если тупил, но все пришло, доставка была дешевой и очень круто что без коммиссии, команде бугис большое спасибо, буду заказывать еще и в следующий раз не тупить

3 Mar 2026, 15:36 UTC778 viewsread 9 August 2026

привет,забрал поставку,думал что побыстрее прийдет,но все равно все четко,качество супер,еще буду брать👍

2 Mar 2026, 15:14 UTC794 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

все приехало все круто классно спасибо дядюшке бугису

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Feedbackboges. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 273,922 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Feedback/Отзывы о нас” (@Feedbackboges), 116 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Feedbackboges.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.