26 Mar 2026, 13:11 UTC272 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв покупаю трафик у многих в свои боты но самый большой процент рега у @geniusyaa. 50%+. Советую к сотрудничеству
Channel
Отзывы Pavel Media 💎
@FeedbackGns
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
38subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002345089854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FeedbackGns |
| Description | Владелец: @geniusyaa Проекты: @BotoReklam |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 12 January 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FeedbackGns |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 38 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 38 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
25 Feb 2026, 13:53 UTC396 viewsread 10 August 2026
Работаю с @geniusyaa, не долго За это время ни разу не был обижен) Хороший собеседник, партнер и прочее, можно многое за него говорить. По оплате вообще, даже писать напоминать не нужно, сам пишет и дает. В общем, если хотите работать без нервов и получать оплаты вовремя то вам, к Паше👋
18 Feb 2026, 13:17 UTC417 viewsread 10 August 2026
#Отзыв Работаю с @geniusyaa с прошлого года, ни разу еще не подвел. Очень надежный человек, к работе относится ответственно, заводит рассылки очень вкусно, однозначно рек!
12 Feb 2026, 09:21 UTC390 viewsread 10 August 2026
Сотрудничаем уже прилично давно с данным человеком - @geniusyaa Все супер, пупер, вышка, класс, на высшем уровне, не передать словами секси шмекси Рекомендую
11 Feb 2026, 16:50 UTC323 viewsread 10 August 2026
Давно работаю с @geniusyaa, не админ, а золото. Если хотелось бы купить долитую рассылку, отличную приветку или же качественное ОП – Вам к этому добряку. Оплатки в кармане, не успев и подумать, одним словом... Совет да любовь❤️
17 Jul 2025, 15:47 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв Покупал рассылку у @geniusyaa в его боте, хороший заход Рекомендую к работе
20 Mar 2025, 12:39 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв Брал рассылку у @geniusyaa в его боте @anonim_chatik_tg_bot . Юзер вышел в 4₽ 🔥 Результат просто бомба, бронируйте апрель пока есть
14 Mar 2025, 20:15 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв Покупал рассылку в боте у @geniusyaa, завёл в 3.9р за переход, 75% регистраций, рекомендую забрать пару мест 🦋
8 Mar 2025, 12:36 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв Работал с @geniusyaa, ровный админ, быстро договорились по цене и объему ✅✅✅
15 Feb 2025, 17:32 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв Брал рассылку у @geniusyaa в @Anonim_chatik_tg_bot, зашло в 4₽ чисто с рассылки, забронировал ещё пару мест, советую всем
13 Feb 2025, 17:25 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 10 August 2026
Брал рекламу у @geniusyaa сделал всё без обмана, а самое главное несмотря на мою ошибку с переводом поставил рекламу в @obschenie5 , спасибо ему огромное, самый честный владелец группы которого я знаю!✔️
11 Feb 2025, 16:21 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 10 August 2026
#отзыв Беру рассылку у @geniusyaa в @Anonim_chatik_tg_bot 😒 Завел в 3.5₽ пдп РЕКОМЕНДУЮ 👍
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FeedbackGns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,031,006 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FeedbackGns named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@obschenie5
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@piterskiiiy
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы Pavel Media 💎” (@FeedbackGns), 38 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FeedbackGns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.