Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ивент•Крысиная нора

Channel

Ивент•Крысиная нора

@Fedor_Write

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

139subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002871793030
TypeChannel
Username@Fedor_Write
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fedor_Write

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1231391319 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers10 August 2026 — 123 subscribers16 August 2026 — 128 subscribers24 August 2026 — 133 subscribers1 September 2026 — 135 subscribers10 September 2026 — 138 subscribers25 September 2026 — 139 subscribers9 August 202625 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 47 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 05:57139+1
10 Sept 2026, 07:38138+3
1 Sept 2026, 15:13135+2
24 Aug 2026, 21:39133+5
16 Aug 2026, 21:27128+5
10 Aug 2026, 00:30123-1
9 Aug 2026, 03:00124no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:17124first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

256 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8131.6%
💘6023.4%
custom 54272311804391751054517.6%
🔥2710.5%
🍓238.98%
custom 5388705087570862522176.64%
❤‍🔥31.17%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC23 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Зарисовка 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️⁉️🎀🔡 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️2️⃣ Агата ушла в отель, где забронировала свою комнату, и собралась уехать на следующий день. Её агент прислал новую информацию. Другие люди из детективного агентства, которые не должны были быть пойманы, поскольку никак не нарушали закон в Японии, пытались помочь своим товарищам, но безуспешно. Однако это сейчас меньше всего её интересовало. Информации о книге у неё не было, а …

❤3custom 54272311804391751052custom 53887050875708625221

8 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

custom 54272311804391751051

7 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC45 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😌🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

❤10💘6🍓5

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC50 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я решил почитать свою галерею, но понимаю, что не поделиться с вами этим будет равняться преступлением.Вместе улыбваемся, а то он прийдеть вам ночью.

custom 542723118043917510510❤3🍓3

6 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC53 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🌟 ЧИТАТЬ В ТЕЛЕГРАФЕ 🌺 Для единственного в своей роде Диванного критика. Не описать мои чувства, и радость который я испытываю сегодня зная что общаюсь с тобой уже как год. Это я написал для тебя как подарок, думал об этом долго время, и решил написать про них надеюсь тебя понравится.🤩🤩

💘13❤8🔥6custom 54272311804391751052

4 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC231 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Зарисовка 😄🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 Костер к этому часу просел до самого низа, превратившись в пульсирующую груду алых углей, от которых шло сухое, проникающее в самую кожу тепло. Вокруг на бревнах и набросанных на землю спальниках расположились пацаны кто-то уже совсем разморился, положив голову на плечо соседа, кто-то еще бодро водил палкой по пеплу, вырисовывая замысловатые узоры. Фукучи скинул кепку и расстегнул верхнюю пуго…

💘8❤5custom 54272311804391751054

4 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC61 views24 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🍜🍜 😌🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🍫

💘12custom 53887050875708625226custom 54272311804391751056

3 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC269 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Зарисовка 😌🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 Два мальчика сидели и пытались построить песочный замок, обоим было 4–5 лет, но у них не получалось. Дзёно пытался понять, как вообще делать замок, но он постоянно ломался из-за того, что тот сам же его случайно ломал. К сожалению, он был слепым с рождения, ему помогал его друг Тэтте. В отличие от него, тот был здоровым, даже слишком. Также у них были необычные вкусы в еде; если честно, он ин…

🔥6❤3❤‍🔥3🍓3💘1

3 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😌🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 Тэтте сходил в баню, и когда вышел, ответил на сообщение Дзёно. Сказал, что был в бане. (Тэтте просто сказал это, чтобы тот знал, почему ему не отвечал, хотя сам Дзёно даже не интересовался этим). После чего Дзёно в шутку начал требовать фотку.

❤6

3 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC59 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😍⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🤩 😌🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 🍜

💘10❤5custom 54272311804391751055custom 53887050875708625221

2 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC70 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Зарисовка ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Гости шумно болтали друг с другом, слышалась музыка, пары людей танцевали. Я не ожидал сегодня встретиться с Осаму, но его тоже пригласили на этот вечер. Он являлся приемным сыном моего друга; он никогда не рассказывал мне о своей личности и жизни, а я не спрашивал. Потому что если он захочет, то расскажет.Всегда думал так. Он подошёл ко мне и был фамильярен в своём поведении. Гово…

💘10🍓5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Fedor_Write. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ивент•Крысиная нора” (@Fedor_Write), 139 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fedor_Write.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.