Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

_Favel_

@Favel00

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

222subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002434753442
TypeChannel
Username@Favel00
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Favel00

Growth

2228 Aug 2026, 22:00 — 222 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 14:14 — 222 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 22:009 Aug 2026, 14:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 14:14222no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:00222first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.2%
avg views ÷ 222 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held12 (26 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,951
Reactions total275
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

275 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥8631.3%
🔥7125.8%
5921.5%
💋145.09%
🙏134.73%
💘93.27%
🥰82.91%
👍72.55%
🥴72.55%
😨10.364%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC67 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2026/2024 Зацените прогресс. С утра сделала редрав арта двух летней давности. Капец как быстро время летит, казалось я рисовала этот арт совсем недавно, а вот. Уже прошло два года, прикинули? Вот я тоже в шоке. Кто посмнит этот арт с вк? Он настолько старый что появлялся только там хаха. 12 некогда активных подписчиков. Вы тут? Можете делиться в коментах своими редравами, работами 24 года и новыми. По настольгируе

❤‍🔥158🔥6💋2💘1🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC95 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю подогревать вас интерес к моим персам через полноценки 🫦 пол картинок аска уже готовы и скоро я его выложу, надюсь, хаха 💦 Когда я начала рисовать этот арт, я чуть его не дропнула, потому что изначально композиция была отстойно, но благо я сообразила как это исправить хаха

❤‍🔥13🔥51💋1💘1

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC103 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В щитпост канале раскажу про сюжет арта и покажу первоначальные наброски

8❤‍🔥2💋1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC200 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А вот и моя работа для #PC_Sonic_Zine

14🔥7💘3❤‍🔥1💋1

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC109 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему у этого худа такие крутые арты и так мало подписчиков? Вы только посмотрите блин, это же шедевр. Кста эта работа к зину в котором я учавствовала. Скоро выложу свой арт

👍7❤‍🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC94 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @angbbreakPhoto

артбласт по #PC_Sonic_Zine объявляется открытым 🌑I'm Here (Slowed + Reverb)🌑

❤‍🔥9💘2

4 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC126 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

■Комишка колаж■ Вот итог... даааже не знаю что сказать на самом деле. Ну... заказ готов ееее Могу взять ещё один слот на такой арт по фикс цене, кому интересно посмотреть цену можно тут @Favel_price

❤‍🔥17💋2🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC160 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

■Подборка работ■ Скоро итог челенжа. Так что дропаю вам подборку работ! 1. @Void_Entrance 2. @golovkova_2026 3. @yanirra_art 4. @miasgo3/2299 5. @sl0ika_kefir 6. @CatShoCandy 7. @ReedTrail 8. @FanStydio Итоги 10 числа 💐

🔥156❤‍🔥4💋2

3 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC141 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если кто-то успел забыть. У меня есть ос, дааа. Так что вот вам очередной арт с новой проги 🔥

18🔥8💋4❤‍🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC344 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❗️ПОРНО❗️ Внимание гетеро Человек заказал у меня арт в честь своего дня рождения ❤️ всегда так приятно когда на свой день рождения люди радуют себя артом от меня 🙏🤲🔥💐

🔥25🥰7🥴5❤‍🔥4💘21😨1

26 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC268 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

■Кэрос■ Второй. Пу пу пу Кэрос, мелкий, быстрый и жуткий безумный тип, как его описывают. Сам же по себе он Учёный!!. . . Литерат, поет, педогог, философ, лингвист, и чтец и жнец и на дуде игрец, гений, милеардер, плей бой, филонтроп, мастер по энергии и в принципе мастер в ещё 80 темах. По его словам. Покупайте его книги и вступайте в чат рассылку чтоб быть в курсе о новыйх лекциях, покупайте мерч!! Ахахха это все

❤‍🔥132💋1🥴1

26 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC244 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

■Фурус■ Время ночных публикаций. Так что щас покажу ещё 2х осов которых я собираюсь использовать как основных для аска. Это первый Фурус это тоже член галактического совета. Не самый сильный, но один из первых и самых древних учасников. Он отличный врач. Камень в его лбу обладает удевительными лечебными свойствами, что по сути делает его бессмертным. Он ипользует свои знания и энергию чтоб создавать лучше лекарства

🙏13❤‍🔥5🔥21🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Favel00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,786 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“_Favel_” (@Favel00), 222 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Favel00.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.