Channel
@FavaedvaTaraef
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
331subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001530558281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FavaedvaTaraef |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FavaedvaTaraef |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 331 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 333 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 333 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 331 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (3 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,061 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
۲. یورگن هابرماس و نئو-کانتیها هابرماس در نوشتههای خود درباره محافظهکاری آلمانی، پدیدارشناسیِ اخلاقیِ شلر را نمونهای از «محافظهکاریِ فرهنگیِ رادیکال و ضد-روشنگری» میداند. هابرماس و کارل-اتو آپل معتقدند که ادعای شلر درباره «شهودِ عینیِ سلسلهمراتب ارزشها»، در نهایت یک دگماتیسمِ شهودگرایانه است که راه را بر گفتمان دموکراتیک میبندد. تقبیحِ «رفاه عمومی» و «خیریه» توسط شلر، توجیهی فلسفی برای بیاعتنایی به بیعدالت…
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
گزارش هوش مصنوعی: رسانتیمان (کینتوزی) در ساختار اخلاقیات (Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moralen) در نظام پدیدارشناسیِ اخلاقِ شلر، مفهوم «نظم عشق» (Ordo Amoris) و «سلسلهمراتبِ ماتریالِ (محتوایی) ارزشها» محوریت دارد. فصول ۴ و ۵ کتاب بالا کاربستِ این پدیدارشناسی در تحلیلِ زوالِ اخلاق مدرن است. فصل چهارم: رسانتیمان و عشق بشردوستانه مدرن (Ressentiment und moderne Menschenliebe) شلر در این فصل به تقابل دو پارا…
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
ادامه👇 @FavaedvaTaraef
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
ادامه👇 @FavaedvaTaraef
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
بعضی از دوستان گمان کردند با متن و کلیپ بالا به احساساتیگری و سانتیمانتالیسم اخلاقی دچار شده و از آن دفاع میکنم. اما منبنده خود پیشتر در نقد این نوع اخلاق مطلبی ارسال کرده بودم و شخصاً هم سالهاست مراقب این نکته هستم. سخن بر سر این بود که چیزی به ضد خود تبدیل شده و دقیقاً دارد ضد کارکرد خود عمل کرده و خودش عکس غرض از وجود خودش را تولید میکند. مبارزه با چنین چیزی، یعنی با صورتهای دینی خالی از محتوا و بل مولد …
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
ادامه👇 @FavaedvaTaraef
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
بهره هوشی و اخلاق اگر لبّ لباب دین را اخلاق بدانیم، مؤمن واقعی ناگزیر باید بهره قابلتوجهی از هوش هیجانی و اخلاقی و شناختی مرتبط داشته باشد (دقیقاً بههمین معنا که در این کلیپها میبینیم). مهمترین کارکرد دین در حوزه اجتماعی هم تقویت همین هوش در باورمندان است و از این رو، اگر این کارکرد از دست برود و تنها پوسته یک دین باقی بماند، چهبسا بهتر است دست از آن پوسته هم بشوییم و این کارکرد مهم را به نامی دیگر و با سازو…
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
@FavaedvaTaraef
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
جنجالیترین شخصیت سنتگرایان (Traditionalists) در حوزه سیاست، جولیوس اوولا (Julius Evola) سنتگرای برجسته ایتالیایی و چهره غریب باطنگرایی سده پیشین است که در ایران چنانکه باید شناخته نشده است. بحث سید نظامالدین احمد درباره او را اینجا میتوان شنید. فایل صوتیاش را میفرستم. 👇👇👇 @FavaedvaTaraef
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
This is what it means to participate in the primordial tradition in the present. For Guénon and others, it was in the traditions of the “East” that the primordial tradition was closest to being preserved. And it was in an elite vanguard that tradition could be carried forward. In the west, Traditionalists saw the onslaught of the characteristic modern values of materialism and individualism as adversaries. From his …
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
Bannon’s Traditionalist Political Theology Bannon expresses his arguments in “documentary” films and in interviews. His films evince the drama that one would expect from a person who believes that we are in the midst of a dark age. This is especially clear in his documentary Generation Zero (Citizens United, 2010). The film adopts a cyclical view of American history, citing William Strauss and Neil Howe’s The Fourt…
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
While continuing to deal with these legal troubles, Bannon also hosts a podcast called Steve Bannon’s War Room where he takes on the persona of a right-wing radio host, commenting on the daily headlines, promoting anti-vaccine theories, and putting forward political conspiracies about the 2020 US presidential election.[2] Despite this, attention to Bannon’s political theology of Traditionalism remains necessary as th…
Signed سعید فتحعلیزاده
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @FavaedvaTaraef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 659,569 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوائد و طرائف” (@FavaedvaTaraef), 331 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FavaedvaTaraef.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.