Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FarzamBodaghi_STR

Channel

FarzamBodaghi_STR

@FarzamBodaghi_Civil

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,036subscribers

+337 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001429909370
TypeChannel
Username@FarzamBodaghi_Civil
Descriptionبرای ارتباط با من @farzambodaghi شماره تماس 09125420481
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 2 October 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/FarzamBodaghi_Civil

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,69910,0389,868.56 August 2026 — 9,699 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,699 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,746 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,828 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,842 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,845 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,855 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,868 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,954 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,970 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,983 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,988 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,006 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,010 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,012 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,016 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,023 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,025 subscribers26 September 2026 — 10,032 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,030 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,035 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,028 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,027 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,029 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,032 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,031 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,030 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,028 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,029 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,030 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,031 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,036 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,038 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,033 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,034 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,033 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,035 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,037 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,034 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,038 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,034 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,037 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,029 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,034 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,036 subscribers10,0366 August 20269 November 2026
48 measurements spanning 95 days, net +337. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,648–10,089 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:4110,036+2
8 Nov 2026, 11:5110,034+5
7 Nov 2026, 06:2710,029-8
6 Nov 2026, 03:1710,037+3
5 Nov 2026, 01:0910,034-4
4 Nov 2026, 04:3610,038+4
3 Nov 2026, 04:3010,034-3
2 Nov 2026, 06:0810,037+2
1 Nov 2026, 04:1110,035+2
31 Oct 2026, 07:4010,033-1
30 Oct 2026, 04:5510,034+1
29 Oct 2026, 01:4710,033-5
28 Oct 2026, 03:2610,038+2
27 Oct 2026, 00:1610,036+5
25 Oct 2026, 21:2510,031+1
25 Oct 2026, 00:2710,030+1
23 Oct 2026, 21:2610,029+1
22 Oct 2026, 23:1910,028-2
22 Oct 2026, 00:3110,030-1
20 Oct 2026, 16:0610,031first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 2 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 10,036 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held47 (2 October 2020 – 6 November 2026)
Views total11,980
Reactions total295
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10
Links
22

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,534 reactions across 45 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,10572.0%
❤34722.6%
😍342.22%
🙏291.89%
🔥110.717%
👎80.522%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,534 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2020 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,340 views15 reactionsread 8 November 2026

📌 راهکارهای اقتصادی برای دیوارهای حائل 📌 راهنمای نرم افزار انتقال فونداسیون از SAFE به PLAXIS 3D 📌 مراحل اجرای نیلینگ در خاک 📌 برنامه اکسل تخمین مدول الاستیسیته و ضریب پواسون خاک‌های مختلف 📌 کتاب راهنمای طراحی و ساخت ساختمان به روش تاپ داون Top-Down 📌 روش‌های بهسازی خاک در طراحی و اجرا 📌 نظام‌نامه تعیین مسئولیت‌ها در گودبرداری ساختمان 📌 طراحی ظرفیتی و اهداف عملکردی در فونداسیون‌ها 📌 پروژه پایدارسازی گود با پل…

👍15

4 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC≈2,030 views11 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

https://jasazeh.ir/product/aicivil/ جهت دسترسی به این محتوا از لینک فوق میتوانید استفاده کنید.

👍11

1 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,910 views52 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍52

1 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,830 views72 reactionsread 10 November 2026

مباحثی چون یادگیری ماشین، کاربردهای هوش مصنوعی در کدنویسی و ساختن ابزارهای مهندسی به کمک آن سرفصل جدیدی است که ما مهندسین باید به سرعت خودمان را با آن همخوان کنیم. در این راستا یک ابزار آفلاین برای طراحی اتصالات RBS آماده کردم و اون‌رو تا حد ممکن صحت سنجی کردم. این ابزار به رایگان پیوست شده است. علاقمندم نقطه نظراتتون و تجربیاتتون رو در این خصوص و بالاخص فایل پیوست دریافت کنم. باتشکر

👍72

1 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC≈2,870 views145 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

به لطف خدا مقاله‌ی جدیدم در ژورنال Structures (Elsevier) چاپ شد. در این مقاله از یادگیری ماشین برای ارزیابی شکنندگی سکوهای دریایی نوع جکت تحت تحریک لرزه‌ای استفاده شده است. این رویکرد نشانگر این است که یادگیری ماشین و کاربرد هوش مصنوعی، وقتی کنار دانش مهندسی بشینه، قادر است مسئله‌های سنگین ما رو حل ‌کنه. ———————————— بر خود لازم می‌دانم از استاد ارجمندم، جناب آقای دکتر علی‌اکبر آقاکوچک، به‌خاطر راهنمایی‌های ارزشمند…

👍145

27 Sept 2026, 06:17 UTC≈11,800 views80 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

با سلام و احترام همکار عزیز و با دانش من آقای مهندس آصفی زحمت تهیه فایل اکسل کاربردی‌ای را کشیده‌اند که جزییات آن بشرح زیر است: -محاسبات مربوط به نیروی زلزله مربوط به مخازن مطابق آیین نامه ۰۳۸ -محاسبات مربوط به روش استاتیکی معادل برای بررسی اثرات ناشی از ارتعاش مایعات نگهداری شده - محاسبات مربوط با نیروهای ناشی از ارتعاش افقی مخازن -محاسبات مربوط با توزیع نیروهای هیدرودینامیکی در راستای افقی و قائم -محاسبات مربوط ب…

👍79👎1

3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC≈13,400 views22 reactionsread 10 November 2026

https://survey.porsline.ir/s/OEVLl8G4#?ref=te

👍22

27 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC≈13,900 views48 reactionsread 10 November 2026

همان‌طور که گفته شد، در بسیاری از موارد کنترل اصلی بر اساس نشست انجام می‌شود. با این حال، شرایطی وجود دارد که ممکن است ظرفیت باربری نهایی و گسیختگی خاک نیز کنترل‌کننده باشد. برای مثال، اگر خاک دارای شرایط نامناسب باشد، لایه مقاوم در عمق مناسبی قرار نداشته باشد یا پی در نزدیکی سطح زمین قرار گرفته باشد، ممکن است ظرفیت باربری گسیختگی پی به اندازه‌ای پایین باشد که دیگر نتوان صرفاً بر اساس کنترل نشست درباره ایمنی پی قضاوت…

👍48

27 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈6,440 views34 reactionsread 10 November 2026

نکته مهم این است که ضرایب مربوط به اثر شیب بار صرفاً یک اصلاح ساده و مستقل از سایر اجزای رابطه ظرفیت باربری نیستند. روابط متداول ظرفیت باربری معمولاً از چند جمله تشکیل می‌شوند و ضریب کاهش ناشی از مؤلفه افقی بار یا زاویه برآیند نیروها در هر یک از جملات مربوطه وارد می‌شود. برای مثال، در روابطی که بر مبنای نسبت (H/V) اثر نیروی افقی را در نظر می‌گیرند، افزایش این نسبت باعث کاهش ظرفیت باربری می‌شود. در روابطی که اثر شیب …

👍34

27 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈6,550 views25 reactionsread 10 November 2026

۳. فونداسیون‌های نواری و پی‌های شبکه‌ای با رفتار غیرگسترده در فونداسیون‌های نواری، که معمولاً عرض پی نسبتاً محدود است و در بسیاری از موارد عرض آن کمتر از حدود ۳ متر است، شرایط رفتاری با یک فونداسیون گسترده تفاوت اساسی دارد. در این نوع پی‌ها، معمولاً کنترل ظرفیت باربری و احتمال گسیختگی خاک اهمیت بیشتری پیدا می‌کند. همچنین در برخی سازه‌ها، به‌ویژه در محل دیوارهای برشی و سیستم‌های مهاربندی، ممکن است پی تحت ترکیبی از ن…

👍25

27 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈6,360 views23 reactionsread 10 November 2026

به عبارت دیگر، نباید دو مفهوم زیر را با یکدیگر یکسان در نظر گرفت: تنش مجاز ناشی از کنترل نشست؛ که هدف آن محدود کردن تغییرشکل و نشست پی در شرایط بهره‌برداری است. ظرفیت باربری نهایی خاک؛ که به ایمنی در برابر گسیختگی برشی خاک مربوط می‌شود. بنابراین اگر عددی به‌عنوان تنش مجاز پی صرفاً از تحلیل نشست‌های بلندمدت به دست آمده باشد، نمی‌توان بدون بررسی مبنای آن، همان عدد را مستقیماً برای کنترل ترکیبات بار زلزله به کار برد.…

👍23

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @FarzamBodaghi_Civil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @FarzamBodaghi_Civil as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مهندسی عمران | سبزسازه
@sabzsaze · 41,404
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
دپارتمان آموزشی پاراسیویل| ♾عمران و معماری
@paracivil1 · 22,957
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
⚖حقوق مهندسی ایران
@hoghugh_mohandesi · 33,914
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
آکادمی عمران
@academy_of_civil · 38,545
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
آزمون نظام مهندسی | کارشناسی رسمی
@civil_nezam_azmoon · 46,222
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
مقررات ملی ساختمان
@Building_Regulation · 22,348
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
کانال مهندسین عمران
@civilx · 43,908
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
سازمان نظام مهندسی ساختمان استان تهران
@tceopr · 27,235
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
کانال ناظران ،مجريان و طراحان برتر
@nazeran_mojrian_bartar · 21,820
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
CivilCa
@civilca · 63,098
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
تحصیلات تکمیلی
@PhdHi · 40,200
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FarzamBodaghi_STR” (@FarzamBodaghi_Civil), 10,036 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FarzamBodaghi_Civil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.