Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Путь до 2,1ккк

Channel

Путь до 2,1ккк

@FargenCapt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

253subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004361735716
TypeChannel
Username@FargenCapt
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 9 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FargenCapt

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

253328290.510 August 2026 — 328 subscribers10 August 2026 — 327 subscribers17 August 2026 — 328 subscribers24 August 2026 — 296 subscribers31 August 2026 — 275 subscribers9 September 2026 — 257 subscribers16 September 2026 — 253 subscribers10 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 242–339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:57253-4
9 Sept 2026, 21:40257-18
31 Aug 2026, 18:13275-21
24 Aug 2026, 21:43296-32
17 Aug 2026, 23:47328+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:46327-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:15328first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60305816148812834473738.5%
custom 54023576933881893312728.1%
custom 60306364272539157182121.9%
❤66.25%
custom 536846124884742063755.21%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC75 viewsread 10 August 2026

Конты на бр изменили? Ток что в +30кк ушел чисто открывая красные конты ( не помню название конта )

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC97 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ебать спасибо вам большое,люблю вас мои крошечки 💋

custom 603058161488128344713custom 54023576933881893317

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC97 viewsread 10 August 2026

ПОЦАНДРЕ 300 САБОВ ТОК ЧТО ЗАМЕТИЛ

9 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сука я с этими конкурсами уже забылся весь

custom 60305816148812834476custom 60306364272539157182

9 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC111 viewsread 10 August 2026

БЛЯЯЯЯ Я ЖЕ ХОТЕЛ СЛОВИТЬ ТК БУС

9 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC121 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Извращюги блябуду

custom 60305816148812834475custom 54023576933881893313custom 60306364272539157182

9 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC146 viewsread 10 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победители: 1. VIRUS SOLO (@VirusReal) 2. ⴸⵊⴽƲⵢ (@VirusRip) 3. arìka (@ririraki) 4. polina 🤍 (@poliyania) 5. sss 6. m.r '17 (@miarozw) Проверить результаты ✅

9 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC150 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В этот раз ненадо отписывать,каждому закину без рр

custom 54023576933881893311

9 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC157 viewsread 10 August 2026

100 чатов раскида - 50 звезд ( за раскид выдам завтра ненадо писать ыыыыы не выдал звизды ) В комм скрины раскида со временем

9 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC332 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Фк на 6 мишек Итоги на 100 тапов @FargenCapt

custom 54023576933881893319custom 60305816148812834474custom 60306364272539157183

9 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC161 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кошмар и еркош сразу отпадают ( вин в том )

custom 60306364272539157188custom 60305816148812834474custom 54023576933881893313

9 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC169 viewsread 10 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победители: 1. алисяка (@alisyaka67) 2. Бойка (@UMEP_ZA_BITCOIN) 3. 𝙺𝙾𝚂𝙷𝙼𝙰𝚁 (@repKOSHMSR) 4. trigger (@xyrovu) 5. х*кс (@kskakawld) 6. Gora maria (@Setayesh548) 7. ERKOSH#деспотизм (@Erkos8) Проверить результаты ✅

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FargenCapt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Путь до 2,1ккк” (@FargenCapt), 253 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FargenCapt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.