🔴طی خبرایی که رسیده دستمون سوالات کنکور پخش شده، بیچاره اونایی که طی یسال زحمت کشیدن💔 📥دریافت pdf سوالات کنکور 1405 اکانت مشکوک اکسپت نمیشه!!!!

Channel
زیست فرهمندنیا 1405
@Farahmandniy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
73,897subscribers
-2,505 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002013030137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Farahmandniy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Farahmandniy |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 73,897 | -332 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 74,229 | -271 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 74,500 | -360 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 74,860 | -268 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 75,128 | -280 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 75,408 | -208 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 75,616 | -361 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 75,977 | -249 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 76,226 | -176 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 76,402 | first reading |
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.871%
- avg views ÷ 73,897 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 644
- 50 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.062%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 50
- of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (30 June 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,186 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔴جلسه 3 سالیانه زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✔️ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
🔴جلسه 2 همایش اورانیوم زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✅ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
🔴جلسه 3 سالیانه زیست یازدهم فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✅ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
🔴جلسه 5 دوره پریمیوم زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✅ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
#پریمیوم_زیست_فرهمندنیا_1405 👨🏫| استاد : فرهمندنیا 📝| رشته : تجربی - ریاضی جلسه 0 👈🏼(دریافت) جلسه 1 👈🏼(دریافت) جلسه 2 👈🏼(دریافت) جلسه 3 👈🏼(دریافت) جلسه 4 👈🏼(دریافت) جلسه 5 👈🏼(دریافت)✅ جزوات خام(دریافت) طرح درس (دریافت) کتاب درسی(دریافت) 🔴بقیه کانال های درسیمون🥲👇 @Channel_drsi
❤1
🔴جلسه 3 سالیانه زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✔️ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
🔴جلسه 16 تست درس زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✔️ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
🔴جلسه 53 شروع مهر زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✔️ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
دم خیلی سبز گرم چ حرکت خفنی زده تو کانالش=))❤️🔥
باشرف مثلِ خیلی سبز =)) کل کتابهای کنکور و نهایی از فرمول بیست گرفته تا... رایگان گذاشته برای همه🔥👆
🔴جلسه 1 همایش اورانیوم زیست فرهمندنیا آپدیت شد ✅ چنل طرح درسمون👇 @tarh_drs
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @Farahmandniy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Farahmandniy edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 16 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@koonekoor03 · 91,482
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
@amirghozaty · 138,259
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@riazikaramii1403 · 89,138
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
@moenkaramii · 99,239
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@farzam_jon · 102,600
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@ryazimoeen · 89,483
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
@animation_darsi · 173,705
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
@hsjwiiqiqoqooq · 160,991
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@farahaniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii · 113,095
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@hanif_azimiiii1405 · 92,350
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@farahani1405 · 108,463
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
@Medicall_worldd · 146,923
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@Animation_Medical · 115,900
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
@biamaz · 117,055
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
@pdfraygan · 99,214
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
@ye_Konkorie · 136,341
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@amirghozaty404 · 143,867
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@filmiranii090 · 98,130
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
@KONKORINEWSS · 158,854
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
@film_neptune · 128,064
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@shimi_farrrhani · 109,649
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@tamland_clasinoo · 101,699
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
@maz_konkuor · 162,692
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“زیست فرهمندنیا 1405” (@Farahmandniy), 73,897 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Farahmandniy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.