Таблица FTP | FarTuna Faceit pinned «0 LVL FarTuna Faceit 0 - 50 FTP I'm gold 3 35 FTP Theropy 25 FTP Tt.pro 15 FTP qq 30 FTP Kirill z 30 FTP apathymoment 25 FTP h1zmi 15 FTP Sayzzz 30 FTP Mellonty - 35 FTP clam - 30 FTP FaZent - 15 FTP kuпов 35 FTP Nedy 35 FTP Berticate 35 FTP G-O-R 35 FTP…»

Channel
Таблица FTP | FarTuna Faceit
@FarTuna_points
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002752355420 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FarTuna_points |
| Created | 1 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FarTuna_points |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 49 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 49 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 46.9% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 31.3% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 3.13% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 23 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Быстрый поиск FarTuna Faceit: 0 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL 🪖 LVL BAN LIST
❤5👎2🔥1🥰1
0 LVL FarTuna Faceit 0 - 50 FTP I'm gold 3 35 FTP Theropy 25 FTP Tt.pro 15 FTP qq 30 FTP Kirill z 30 FTP apathymoment 25 FTP h1zmi 15 FTP Sayzzz 30 FTP Mellonty - 35 FTP clam - 30 FTP FaZent - 15 FTP kuпов 35 FTP Nedy 35 FTP Berticate 35 FTP G-O-R 35 FTP Toxisss 15 FTP H1zmi 25 FTP NewEye90 30 FTP Zero666 25 FTP Ninast 35 FTP Апрельский 30 FTP Pad1nktoN 15 FTP Вирал 30 FTP shokwave - 60 FTP n1 - 35 FTP StrongWar77 …
1️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 51 - 100 FTP R1chard - 90 FTP психотерапия - 85 FTP Apathymoment 70 FTP Candyyy 80 FTP 123 55 FTP Shockwave 90 FTP 3U 90 FTP penguin - 55 FTP Snezyy 95 FTP Hupahups - 55 FTP Hi-Lo - 55 FTP BlueWindy 100 FTP stp - 85 FTP Хлебный 140 FTP wenb3r - 50 FTP skyler - 60 FTP flyij 60 FTP Starfoxyyy 55 FTP Haze 90 FTP SKORPIONSKY 55 FTP fanatix666 - 55 FTP
2️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 101 - 150 FTP Danzyy 115 FTP 2r2 sr - 235 FTP YummySapper - 140 FTP Blackjack 115 FTP Мккл 130 FTP GoodLife52 - 200 FTP Fastk1ler 210 FTP
3️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 151 - 250 FTP Fantix 155 FTP @научиулыбатся - 240 FTP fantix 190 FTP T1yers 270 FTP Zuvix 245 FTP mS 225 FTP maon 240 FTP
4️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 251 - 400 FTP Noxisss 325 FTP Chapman 270 FTP H3artS 350 FTP sosolut 400 FTP PrivateVeteran45 255 FTP HaoS - 295 FTP Hikuna1337 - 340 FTP
5️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 401 - 750 FTP WOROBEI - 680 FTP insomnia 585 FTP твой бог? 445 FTP Blakuu 500 FTP perform - 450 FTP Hozecs 410 FTP
❤3
6️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 751 - 900 FTP Darkhero - 795 FTP
👎5
7️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 901 - 1000 FTP
8️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 1001 - 1500 FTP
9️⃣ LVL FarTuna Faceit 1501 - 3000 FTP
👎3❤1❤🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @FarTuna_points. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,182,270 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Таблица FTP | FarTuna Faceit” (@FarTuna_points), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FarTuna_points.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.