21 Dec 2025, 11:04 UTC≈2,960 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @fancymodels $799 great model as always
Channel
FancyModels | Reviews & Vouches
@FancyModelsReviews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
682subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001954497358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FancyModelsReviews |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FancyModelsReviews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 682 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 678 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 678 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
18 Dec 2025, 13:12 UTC≈3,050 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @fancymodels ($399) First time I’ve seen a marketplace this serious, with such smooth and professional processes. Everything is fast and well organized, and the team is very responsive. Highly recommended 🤝
17 Dec 2025, 14:11 UTC≈3,060 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @fancymodels would definitely work with them again they were responsive through the whole process and offered refund and change of model,model is responsive and great to work with🫡
12 Dec 2025, 12:25 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 8 August 2026
vouch @fancymodels everything went smoothly, very professional team just bought two models, one of them wasnt the right fit and they immediately gave me a refund would recommend to anyone looking to buy creators!
8 Dec 2025, 09:19 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @FancyModels always deliver! ($549) Curated Quality Creators… Smooth communication… Professionalism is always priority. Will work with them anytime. Feel free to share this review.
8 Dec 2025, 09:10 UTC≈2,190 viewsread 8 August 2026
Purshased model couple weeks ago $530, dont have any bad words to say, shes hard working, always sends content on time (sometimes sooner) , very reliable. Didnt regret purchasing it. Ill gladly come back for more.
7 Dec 2025, 11:07 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 8 August 2026
Just picked up a creator through Fancymodels for $940 and the experience has been great so far. She’s serious, responsive, and clearly ready to work with a real agency. We only want models who are honest and committed, and this was a perfect match. Support from the Fancymodels team has been smooth and helpful. A strong A+ from me
5 Dec 2025, 12:53 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @fancymodels + $479 + Good service 🤝
2 Dec 2025, 08:19 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 8 August 2026
@fancymodels + 1399$ + perfect service all this good with the model
27 Nov 2025, 14:10 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 8 August 2026
@fancymodels + $1499 + the service was the fastest than I‘ve ever experienced from any marketplace. Everything went smoothly with fancymodels and also with the model itself. It took us 3 days until we could start work. I would buy here again 100%!
23 Nov 2025, 21:35 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @fancymodels , $579 + everything went smooth and happy with your service will definitely continue to work with you guys big up 🆙 🫡
23 Nov 2025, 15:34 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 8 August 2026
Vouch @fancymodels + $399 💸 Really happy with the collaboration! We had some issues with the first model, but the Fancy team was very attentive and professional, extremely helpful. We managed to change the first contract after their suggestion, because they really want us to grow. The next deal was perfect, and it's keep running smoothly. 🤝
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FancyModelsReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 53,235 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FancyModels | Reviews & Vouches” (@FancyModelsReviews), 682 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FancyModelsReviews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.