3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185–187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 01:20
185
-2
28 Sept 2026, 07:22
187
no change
28 Sept 2026, 06:47
187
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
68.3%
avg views ÷ 185 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
20 (13 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
1,137
Reactions total
67
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50
35.2%
🕊
42
29.6%
❤🔥
16
11.3%
🍾
12
8.45%
🔥
12
8.45%
🎄
9
6.34%
🤝
1
0.704%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
•
معنویات و روحی💚:
الان لازم نیست همه چیز رو با منطق و تحلیلت بفهمی؛ نگاه کن!
ممکنه راهنمایی از طریق تکرارِ یه نماد/عدد/ کلمه/ خواب /آهنگ/حیوان/ تصویر یا اتفاقِ ظاهراً تصادفی دیده بشه -
به شهودت توجه کن [ولی هر اتفاقی رو فوراً نشونهٔ قطعی نبین❗️]
ممکنه جواب در چیزی باشه ک چند بار پشت سر هم توجهت رو جلب میکنه 🌀-
قبل از اینکه جواب رو از دنیایِ بیرونت بگیری، ببین دنیایِ درونت مدام چه چیزی رو میخواد -
مثلاً ممکنه یه شکل…
#انرژی_فرشتگان
[ به نشونه ها توجه کن ؛ جواب و راهنمایی ک دنبالشی ممکنه از طریق یه اتفاقی ساده یا حسِ درونی بهت نشون داده بشه 👁]
ادامه در متن ِ پایین 👇🏻
•
بطور کُلی :
یه اتفاق / خبر/ تغییـر یا نتیجه در آیندهٔ نزدیک ⭐
چیزی که مدتی در حالتِ انتظار ، سکون یا ابهام بوده ، کم کم حرکت میکنه -
لازم نیست همه چیز رو همین الان پیشبینی کنی ؛ بخشی از مسیـر هنوز در حال شکل‌گیری عه 🫀
تایمش هم خیلی نزدیکه🔆
روابط عاطفی[همهٔ روابط] :
پیام/تماس/ دیدار/ گفت و گو یا تغییرِ وضعیتِ رابطه در آینده نزدیک ⭐
اگر رابطه ای در شرایط سکـوت و فاصله باشه 👈🏻 این سکوت قرار نیست لزوماً برایِ م…
•
روابط عاطفی🫀:
اگر درباره احساس شخصی میخوای بدونی، فعلاً همه چیز رو نمیتونی از ظاهرش بفهمی ؛ یکم فاصله و سکوت باعث روشن شدن واقعیت میشه⏳
برای روابط بلاتکلیف یا سرد👈🏻 توصیه میشه دنبال جواب ندویی ؛ اجازه بده طرف مقابل و اتفاقات و جریانات ، خودشون اطلاعاتِ لازم رو آشکار کنن 🫀
ممکنه جواب اولش به شکل یه حس درونی، خواب، نشونه یا یهویی باشه و بعد در دنیای بیرونی تأیید بشه که اها پس موضوع این بوده و...
اگر بین :حرکت کنم ی…
#انرژی_فرشتگان
[ با اینکه بارها تلاش کردی برای پیدا کردن جواب سوال هات ولی موفق نبودی ، علتش اینکه جوابی که دنبالشی، بیشتر از سکوت و درونت میاد ، مدیتیشن و فعالیت های معنوی میتونن بهتون کمک کنن ]
ادامه متن ِ پایین 👇🏻
•
تُ تنهـا نیستـی 📌-
شما رو دعوت میکنن به ارتباط ؛ راهنمایی و اعتماد به هدایت ِ الهی
روحی و معنوی :
لازم نیس همهٔ جواب ها رو همین الان خودت پیدا کنی ؛ از خداوند و فرشتگان راهنمایی بخواه🙏🏻
ممکنه مدتی در شرایطی باشی که بینِ چند انتخاب ،چند احساس یا چند مسیر گیر کردی و ذهنت دائماً میخواد همه چیزو تحلیل کنه، یکم از این تحلیلا فاصله بگیر و از خدایِ خود درخواست کن، که مسیر درست برات روشن بشه 💙-
و ممکنه جواب به شکل یه اتف…
#انرژی_فرشتگان
دعوت به دعـا و گفت‌وگـوی ِشخصی با خدایِ خود ،
[ نه صرفاً دعـا برای اینکه 👈🏻 فلان اتفاق حتماً بیوفته یا خداوندا کاری کن فلان شخص وارد زندگیم بشه و ...
در حالی تغییر در نوع دیدگاهتون 👈🏻 خدای ِ من اگر این مسیر به صلاحمه ، اونو برام روشن و هموار کن ؛ و اگر نیست ، کمکم کن با آرامش رهـاش کنم و مسیـرِ بهتر رو ببینم 🌱✨ ]
ادامه متن پایین 👇🏻
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Fall_M369. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خودشناسی @khodshenasiofficial · 20,106 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الهـام ِ نو” (@Fall_M369), 185 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fall_M369.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
