Channel
@Faktenchecks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001393952907 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Faktenchecks |
| Description | Argumente für den Alltag - Zahlen, Daten, Fakten & Zeugen |
| Created | 9 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Faktenchecks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 61 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2024 to 27 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ein weiterer Kollege, der sich stetig um Aufklärung und Aufarbeitung bemüht, sowie der systematischen Verfolgung aller Kritiker unterliegt, benötigt unsere Hilfe. Jeder noch so vermeintlich "kleine" Beitrag kann helfen und setzt ein Zeichen, dass wir die mutigen Mediziner nicht vergessen haben. Und jedes Teilen dieses Beitrags hilft ebenfalls. Kannst du helfen? 🙏
Erfolg gibt ihm Recht!🔥Bei AUF1 fordert Naidoo Konsequenzen für Kinderfresser Vom System wurde der Sänger Xavier Naidoo vor Jahren aufgrund seiner Aussagen zu Kindesentführungen und Misshandlungen verlacht und gecancelt. Doch Deutschlands größte Soul-Stimme, wie Naidoo vom Mainstream früher bezeichnet wurde, ist wieder zurück. Trotz seiner mehr als erfolgreichen „Bei meiner Seele“-Comeback-Tour bleibt der Mut-Musike…
Schlaf gut, Stefan Niehoff https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/der-mann-hinter-der-schwachkopf-affaere-ist-tot-stefan-niehoff-mit-65-gestorben-li.10016889
Zum höchsten christlichen Fest https://www1.wdr.de/nachrichten/papst-franziskus-gestorben-100.html
Plötzlich und unerwartet - Ruhe in Frieden https://www.mz.de/panorama/stars-und-prominente/rosenstolz-saengerin-tod-anna-r-polizei-obduktion-ermittlung-4017504
Das ist durch einen Anwalt aus Kölner/Bonner Region bestätigt worden, selber Vorgang & selbes Ergebnis. Auch eine Probezeit wird abgelehnt. https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/firma-will-fluechtlinge-einstellen-agentur-fuer-arbeit-blockiert-67a09f92d565ee0d2850b6ef
Nichts zu verbergen Todd Hayen Diesen Satz „Warum sollte ich mir Sorgen machen? Ich habe nichts zu verbergen“ öfter gehört, als mir lieb ist. Das ist eine klare Unschuldserklärung, die davon ausgeht, dass man nur dann Konsequenzen zu befürchten hat, wenn man ein Verbrechen begangen hat. Aber was ist ein Verbrechen? Und woher… https://uncutnews.ch/nichts-zu-verbergen/
Nicht nur diese Schwäche https://www.spiegel.de/panorama/leute/robert-habeck-gruenen-kanzlerkandidat-spricht-ueber-seine-rechtschreibschwaeche-a-a6a74767-a27f-4f2b-8843-4ed9177aa6fb
https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/deutliches-warnsignal-insolvenzen-steigen-2024-kraeftig-a-b443b509-75bf-4b3d-8ebf-ee058c7145fd
Wie sie alle auf einmal wieder ihre Meinung ändern https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Zuckerberg-klagt-ueber-Biden-und-stampft-Diversitaetsprogramme-ein-article25481678.html
Immer weniger Leistung, mehr Arbeit, weniger Nettolohn aufgrund von Inflation Und und und Jetzt sollen auch Karenztage wieder eingeführt werden… https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/bestehende-fehlanreize-korrigieren-fdp-politiker-will-zahlungsstopp-im-krankheitsfall-auf-drei-karenztage-ausweiten-12997243.html
Norovirus: Großbritannien warnt vor besonders heftiger Infektionswelle https://www.t-online.de/gesundheit/aktuelles/id_100527360/norovirus-grossbritannien-warnt-vor-besonders-heftiger-infektionswelle.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Faktenchecks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Faktencheck - Corona, Staatsversagen & Ärgernisse” (@Faktenchecks), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Faktenchecks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.