Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Fake Quiz

@FakeQuiz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,126subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001448559422
TypeChannel
Username@FakeQuiz
Descriptionمحک،توأم با تلفیقِ ابهام و مزاح،به سبک تیمِ فیک!
Created7 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FakeQuiz

Growth

13,12613,18313,154.56 August 2026 — 13,183 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,176 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,158 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,150 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,134 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,126 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,117–13,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:0713,126-7
11 Aug 2026, 18:2713,133-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:3713,134-16
9 Aug 2026, 15:1213,150-8
8 Aug 2026, 18:0713,158-9
7 Aug 2026, 19:5113,167-9
6 Aug 2026, 17:5013,176-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:1513,183first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,180
Videos
4,070
Links
142

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,145 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣54047.2%
👍44138.5%
554.80%
👎514.45%
😐433.76%
👌151.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 24 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Apr 2025, 10:44 UTC≈11,400 views148 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

اگه همچین اکیپی میخواید دولتی نرید ‏اگه دولتی میخواید حداقل فنی نرید ‏اگه میرید حداقل برق و مکانیک نرید @FakeQuiz

👍73🤣53👎12😐82

21 Apr 2025, 20:23 UTC≈10,800 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

تو رو دیدم خدا خندید... @FakeQuiz

15👌12👍3👎3

19 Apr 2025, 15:27 UTC≈10,300 views132 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

عجیبه @FakeQuiz

👍71🤣53👎61😐1

15 Apr 2025, 16:42 UTC≈10,500 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

شما “عه”پرسن هستید یا “وا”پرسن؟

  1. عه63%
  2. وا12%
  3. عه وا10%
  4. عاو4%
  5. عاااا11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😐25🤣163👍1👎1

15 Apr 2025, 15:13 UTC≈8,120 views67 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

این ویدیو از رقص عجیب در یک مجلس جشن عقد در سال ۷۷، توسط یک کاربر منتشر شده و خیلی استقبال شده =)))) @FakeQuiz

🤣5410👎2👍1

15 Apr 2025, 14:43 UTC≈7,250 views84 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

اره خلاصه @FakeQuiz

👍46🤣332👌2👎1

14 Apr 2025, 17:18 UTC≈6,810 views149 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

این قضیه ی "زن قوی و مستقل" هم مسیر "مرد که گریه نمیکنه" رو داره طی میکنه و سازمان یافتگیش در فرهنگ عمومی شبیه همونه. احتمالا در سال های آینده شاهد سرخوردگی عظیم زنانی باشیم که درگیر این عناوین بودن؛ شبیه مردایی که اشتباها درگیر اون عناوین شدن. باید دقت کنیم همینکه دختر ایرانی با این شرایط توی ایران داره نفس میکشه یعنی قویه. اینکه در جهت استقلال تلاش کنه عالیه ولی نباید تحت تاثیر رفتار توده‌ای فضای مجازی، حس ناکافی

👍137👎74🤣1

12 Apr 2025, 14:31 UTC≈6,870 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

فکت: اونقدری که این مش‌آپ این یه هفته توی ایران پلی شده، خود Azizam نشده =))))

👍16😐5

10 Apr 2025, 15:21 UTC≈7,880 views135 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

هنوزم با اختلاف جز خاص‌ترین ویدئوهای مجازیه. حس چندش رو میشه از تک‌تک اعضای چهره‌ی داماد، دریافت کرد 😂😂😂 @FakeQuiz

🤣1245👍5👎1

10 Apr 2025, 11:03 UTC≈6,970 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

همیشه به سکانس “اسم بابای منو به زبونت نیار احمق” توجه میشده اما این سکانس >>>> @FakeQuiz

🤣61👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @FakeQuiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Apr 2025, 16:42 UTCAnonymous Poll2,530 voters approx.

شما “عه”پرسن هستید یا “وا”پرسن؟

  1. عه63%
  2. وا12%
  3. عه وا10%
  4. عاو4%
  5. عاااا11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 24 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 673,095 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fake Quiz” (@FakeQuiz), 13,126 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FakeQuiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.