Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fabiano T

Channel

Fabiano T

@FabianoTips

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

528subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171812726
TypeChannel
Username@FabianoTips
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/FabianoTips

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5175355267 August 2026 — 517 subscribers8 August 2026 — 517 subscribers15 August 2026 — 521 subscribers21 August 2026 — 526 subscribers27 August 2026 — 525 subscribers5 September 2026 — 526 subscribers14 September 2026 — 533 subscribers26 September 2026 — 535 subscribers7 October 2026 — 528 subscribers5287 August 20267 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 61 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 514–538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 14:20528-7
26 Sept 2026, 02:16535+2
14 Sept 2026, 00:22533+7
5 Sept 2026, 08:58526+1
27 Aug 2026, 15:57525-1
21 Aug 2026, 06:45526+5
15 Aug 2026, 02:45521+4
8 Aug 2026, 04:03517no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:29517first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3873.1%
❤1019.2%
🔥47.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 Lucas Arcanjo vive grande momento e possui uma das maiores médias de defesas do Brasileirão, com 3.6 por jogo. Enfrenta o Flamengo que tem média de 5.6 chutes no gol por partida e deve pressionar muito por jogar em casa, aumentando ainda mais o potencial para que o goleiro do Vitória seja bastante exigido. No confronto da Copa do Brasil, Arcanjo fez 8 defesas contra o Flamengo.

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 Léo Pereira é um dos jogadores com maior média de passes no Brasileirão e deve participar muito da construção das jogadas. O Flamengo tende a dominar completamente a posse de bola, enquanto o Vitória costuma jogar confortável sem a bola, principalmente em confrontos contra equipes tecnicamente superiores. Nesse cenário, a bola passa constantemente pelos zagueiros, principalmente por Léo Pereira, que já dis…

👍3

7 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 Zé Vitor também vive grande momento nesse mercado e superou essa linha em 9 dos últimos 11 jogos. Contra o próprio Flamengo, cumpriu essa marca nas 2 partidas da Copa do Brasil nesta temporada, sofrendo 3 e 4 faltas, respectivamente, mostrando novamente muito valor para essa entrada.

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC69 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 Erick tem sido um dos grandes destaques do Vitória na temporada e ganhou muito protagonismo nesse mercado. Superou essa linha em 6 dos últimos 7 jogos entre Brasileirão e Copa do Brasil. Apesar de o Flamengo não ser uma equipe muito faltosa, em confrontos específicos como esse costuma elevar bastante esse número. No último duelo no Maracanã entre as equipes pelo Brasileirão, Erick sofreu 3 faltas mesmo atu…

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC61 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 1u 📌 Vejo valor também no under de chutes no gol do Santos. A equipe é a que menos acerta o alvo como mandante no Brasileirão, com média de apenas 3.5 chutes certos por jogo. Em toda a competição, a única vez que superou essa linha em casa foi diante da Chapecoense, pior equipe do campeonato. Contra um Athletico organizado defensivamente e que costuma conceder poucas oportunidades, vejo boa chance dessa tendência…

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 1u 📌 Santos e Athletico tem tudo para protagonizar um jogo de poucas finalizações, muito pela dificuldade ofensiva das duas equipes. O Santos é o time que menos finaliza como mandante, com média de 11.1 chutes por jogo, e cede 11.7. Já o Athletico finaliza apenas 10 vezes por jogo como visitante e sofre apenas 12.6 finalizações, números que reforçam um cenário de poucos chutes.

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 1u 📌 Bragantino e Corinthians tem características que favorecem um jogo com poucos chutes no alvo. O Corinthians é o 3º pior time do Brasileirão em chutes certos, com média de apenas 3.6 por jogo, mas também está entre os que menos cedem finalizações. O Bragantino, jogando em casa, tem média de 4.5 chutes no gol, enquanto o Corinthians registra apenas 3 como visitante.

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 O Internacional é o time com mais escanteios no Brasileirão e enfrenta um Palmeiras que está entre as equipes que mais cedem escanteios aos adversários. O Inter superou essa linha em 8 dos 10 jogos como visitante, enquanto o Palmeiras permitiu 4 ou mais escanteios ao adversário na maioria das partidas como mandante, tornando essa linha muito interessante.

👍4

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 Acredito que essa linha esteja muito mais esticada do que deveria. São equipes que prezam pela posse de bola e, nesse tipo de confronto, normalmente o número de finalizações acaba sendo menor do que o mercado projeta. O Cruzeiro tem média de 15.5 finalizações como mandante e cede apenas 8.6, enquanto o Mirassol finaliza 11.1 vezes por jogo como visitante e cede 15.8. Sempre que enfrenta equipes que também …

👍3

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

▶️ 0.5u 📌 O Cruzeiro evoluiu muito defensivamente e não sofreu gols em nenhum dos últimos 3 jogos. Ao mesmo tempo, o Mirassol tem protagonizado partidas com poucos gols ao longo da temporada. Essa linha bateu nos últimos 4 jogos do Cruzeiro e em 6 dos últimos 8 jogos do Mirassol. A equipe paulista começou muito mal o campeonato, mas melhorou bastante defensivamente nas rodadas recentes e costuma fazer jogos de pouco…

👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FabianoTips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fabiano T” (@FabianoTips), 528 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FabianoTips.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.