Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐅𝐀𝐒𝐓 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 ♥️

@Fa_st_fa_mily

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

235subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003774505938
TypeChannel
Username@Fa_st_fa_mily
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Fa_st_fa_mily

Growth

235236235.58 Aug 2026, 02:52 — 236 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 236 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:31 — 235 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:529 Aug 2026, 01:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 235–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 01:31235-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:01236no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:52236first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.8%
avg views ÷ 235 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.746%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (1 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total639
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 46s
Average length
2m 46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1734.0%
🔥1224.0%
🥰918.0%
🫡510.0%
👏36.00%
👾24.00%
🤩12.00%
🤷‍♂12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Fa_st_fa_mily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026

Хто хоче поспілкуватися по ржати , кидаєте запит 😏

1 Aug 2026, 00:57 UTC49 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хочу попередити лідерів та заступників кланів: гравець із тегом @Kashiiik (ID: 5881741028) заходить у клани та намагається переманювати учасників до свого клану. Будьте уважні та обережні, щоб уникнути подібних ситуацій.

28 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC89 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Disne_yyyPhoto

🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 👑Призові місця: 1️⃣місце — 🎁 3️⃣місце — 🎁 🔠місце — 🎁 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ✈️Умови участі: Обовʼязкова підписка на наш ТГК: 1️⃣🔗 DISNEY 😍 3️⃣🔗 Kuromi 🫶 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 30.07.20:00 🌟

23 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC134 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tasyaa201

🤍🤍🤩🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤩🤍🤍 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 1 місце - NFT 2 - 5 місце - 🎁 6 - 17 місце🧸 підписку на : ➡️NIMFOMANS ➡️DISNEY US SHOP ➡️PUBG MOBILE | Chat UA та поставити реакцію на пост результати 23.07.2026 в 22:00 🤩 🤍🤍🤩🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤩🤍🤍

🔥1

19 Jul 2026, 21:53 UTC233 viewsread 8 August 2026

Братва хто ще не приймає участь, давайте приймайте тут на халяву нфт

14 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC498 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥺🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤NFT 🔤🔤🧸 🔤🔤🧸 🔤🔤🧸 🔤🔤🧸 🔤🔤🧸 🔤🔤🧸 Підписатись на канали: AFTORITET FAST FAMILY DISNEY UC SHOP Результати на 233 учасників

10🥰9🔥8🫡5👾2🤩1🤷‍♂1

10 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Disney_US_shopVideo

🏎️ Додали нову колаборацію з Ferrari! 🔥 Головні новинки — ексклюзивні суперкари Ferrari, які вражають своїм дизайном, швидкістю та унікальними ефектами. Крім того, в події доступні рідкісні скіни, емоції та інші цінні нагороди, які точно поповнять вашу колекцію. 👀 Не пропустіть шанс отримати легендарний автомобіль та показати свій стиль на полі бою. Випробуйте удачу вже зараз! 🚗💨 🔴Поповнення по ID 🔴Поповнення по в

10 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC232 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Disney_US_shopPhoto

1 жетон 6700 💳 3 жетона 21700 💳 ✈️Для купівлі писати: 😍 @disney_uc_shop🌺

2👏1🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC140 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @newspubgua

🔞Кастомка🔞 🗓дата: 11.07.2026🗓 ✉️час: 21:00 запуск: 21:20✉️ по Києву 😋призове місце 😋 1-120юс кожному Відбудеться 5 кастомні ігри 💋карта: лівік+івент дуо 💋 🔫ПРАВИЛА🔫 Без будь-якого дробовика На кулак 🚫 💋 Гра на кіли: перемагає команда, у якої більше кілів💋 Порушення правил = виліт🔫 👣 Звертатися за призами @vladic_kf Обов’язково зробити фото переможця та надіслати в приватні повідомлення Всі

3👏2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Fa_st_fa_mily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 928,490 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐅𝐀𝐒𝐓 𝐅𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐋𝐘 ♥️” (@Fa_st_fa_mily), 235 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fa_st_fa_mily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.