Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فرانتس کافکا

Channel

فرانتس کافکا

@F_Kavka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003950242071
TypeChannel
Username@F_Kavka
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 14 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/F_Kavka

Growth

253228.56 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 03:2432+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:2328+2
13 Aug 2026, 07:4426+1
11 Aug 2026, 09:1625no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:2225first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.4%
avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.2
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total91
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1184.6%
😭215.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

هیچ کلمه‌ای با حقیقت نمی‌خواند. مثلاً، من دارم الآن به خانه‌ام می‌روم. ولی این فقط ظاهر امر است. واقعیت اینست که به محبسی می‌روم که خاص خود من ساخته شده، محبسی که زندگی کردن در آن به این دلیل مشکل‌تر است که به خانه‌ای کاملاً عادی و معمولی می‌ماند و کسی _جز من _ زندان بودنش را تشخیص نمی‌دهد. #گفتگو_با_کافکا #گوستاو_یانوش @F_Kavka

10 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

آنچه جرأت می‌خواهد، دوام آوردن است. #گفتگو_با_کافکا #گوستاو_یانوش @F_Kavka

4 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026

به رغم همه‌چیز هیچ آرامشی نیست. امیدهای صبح در بعدازظهر دفن می‌شود. امکان ندارد که بشود با این جور زندگی، دوستانه کنار آمد. مسلماً هرگز کسی وجود نداشته که بتواند چنین کند. وقتی آدم‌های دیگر به این مرز نزدیک می‌شوند، که حتی نزدیک شدن به آن هم اسف‌بار است، به عقب باز می‌گردند؛ من نمی‌توانم. حتی به نظرم می‌رسد که انگار به پای خودم نیامده‌ام بلکه در کودکی به اینجا هل داده شده‌ام و بعد به این نقطه زنجیر شده‌ام. #فرانتس_ک

3 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC20 viewsread 11 August 2026

اندوه و بی‌شکیبی من به خاطر از پادرافتادگی‌ام بخصوص از چشم‌انداز آینده‌ای تغذیه می‌کند که بدین‌گونه برایم تدارک دیده شده و هرگز ازجلوی نظرم دور نمی‌شود. چه شب‌ها، قدم زدن‌ها، نومیدی در بستر و روی نیم‌تخت هنوز در پیش دارم، بدتر از این‌هایی که تابه‌حال کشیده‌ام. #فرانتس_کافکا #یادداشت‌ها @F_Kavka

3 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

این هم درست است که تو حتی یکبار هم مرا واقعاً کتک نزده‌ای. اما همین که فریاد می‌زدی، صورتت سرخ می‌شد، کمربندت را به سرعت باز می‌کردی و روی تکیه‌ٔ صندلی حاضر می‌گذاشتی، همین از کتک زدن بدتر بود. به این می‌مانست که بخواهند کسی را به دار بکشند. وقتی به راستی به دارش بکشند، می‌میرد و همه چیز می‌گذرد. اما وقتی مجبور باشد همهٔ تدارکات اعدام را به چشم ببیند و تازه وقتی که حلقهٔ دار جلو صورتش آویزان است بفهمد که مورد مرحمت و

👍1😭1

2 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC20 viewsread 11 August 2026

گاهی پیش می‌آید فلیسه، که احساس می‌کنم آن‌قدر بر من نفوذ داری که می‌توانی مرا به مردی تبدیل کنی که هر کاری از او ساخته است. #فرانتس_کافکا #نامه_به_فلیسه @F_Kavka

30 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

گوش دادن به حرف‌های پدر با کنایه‌های مداومش دربارهٔ خوش‌اقبالی مردم امروز و به خصوص فرزندانش، درباره مشقت‌هایی که در جوانی‌اش کشیده، خیلی ملال‌انگیز است. هیچ‌کس انکار نمی‌کند که او سال‌ها، در نتیجهٔ نداشتن بالاپوش زمستانی کافی، روی پاهایش زخم‌های ناسور داشته، که گرسنه می‌مانده، که وقتی هنوز ده سالش بوده مجبور بوده یک چرخ دستی را توی دهکده‌ها هول بدهد، حتی توی زمستان و صبح خیلی زود. اما این چیزی است که او هرگز درک نخو

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026

فقط سپاس بر تو که در این جهان هستی... و من از این بابت قدرشناسی خود را (و آیا این قدرشناسی است؟) با بوسه‌ای درست چون بوسه‌ای که در ایستگاه نثارت کردم و هرچند آن را دوست نداشتی نثارت می‌کنم. (امروز من تا حدودی خودرأی شدم) #فرانتس_کافکا #نامه_به_میلنا @F_Kavka

29 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

تردیدی نیست که آیین‌های مذهبی، حتی با آن‌که امروز به آن‌ها عمل می‌شود، به پایان خط رسیده‌اند و صرفا ارزش تاریخی دارند. #فرانتس_کافکا #یادداشت‌ها @F_Kavka

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC167 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

یک فایدهٔ نوشتن یادداشت روزانه این است که آدم با شفافیتی اطمینان‌بخش از تغییراتی آگاهی می‌یابد که مدام از سر گذرانده و به شیوه‌ای کلی آن تغییرها را به صورت طبیعی باور می‌کند، حدس می‌زند، و اعتراف می‌کند، اما وقتی نوبت به کسب امید یا آرامش از چنین اعترافی می‌رسد، آدم ناآگاهانه آن اعتراف را منکر می‌شود. در یادداشت‌ها آدم شاهدی می‌یابد بر این که در وضعیت‌هایی زندگی کرده که امروز ممکن است غیرقابل تحمل به نظر بیایند... #

👍1

26 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC31 viewsread 11 August 2026

تمام طول روز پریشان بودم و ناراضی؛ گویی تماس خودم با تو را، که هرچه باشد برای ادامهٔ زندگی نیازمند آنم، از دست داده‌ام. #فرانتس_کافکا #نامه_به_فلیسه @F_Kavka

26 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

اکثر این کتاب‌های جدید، انعکاس‌های لرزان زمان حال هستند. خیلی زود از میان می‌روند. بهتر است کتابهای قدیمی را بخوانید. نویسندگان کلاسیک را‌. گوته را. آنچه قدیمی است، درونی‌ترین ارزش خود را آشکار می‌کند، یعنی دوام را. آنچه جدید است، ناپایداری صرف است. ناپایداری، امروز زیباست، ولی فردا مسخره می‌نماید. این راه ادبیات است. #گفتگو_با_کافکا #گوستاو_یانوش @F_Kavka

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @F_Kavka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 546,129 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فرانتس کافکا” (@F_Kavka), 32 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F_Kavka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.