Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

аюхуипин ;3

@FW3CK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

50subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002286108019
TypeChannel
Username@FW3CK
Descriptionв глубочайшем ресте ; pfp cr aoriiiir alight motion old channel @cloudburst20
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FW3CK

Growth

509 Aug 2026, 07:45 — 50 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 11:16 — 50 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 07:4510 Aug 2026, 11:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 11:1650no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:4550first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
22
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
59s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

176 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53728339292816803985732.4%
2916.5%
custom 5247248505726075336158.52%
custom 5188650909697081344147.95%
custom 5251357492348220071137.39%
custom 5188300341581484130126.82%
custom 5221940032977256146105.68%
custom 524476216633828893095.11%
custom 524722124986360215895.11%
custom 524671605004045470684.55%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FW3CK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 5 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC58 views10 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

добрый вечер. как давно я тут не появлялась, за что, конечно же, прошу прощения ;( к сожалению, мой телефон отказывается терпеть алайт, из-за чего у меня не получается добавить в проект что-то больше пары фоток вместе с песней, при этом не получая вылет из приложения. на данный момент свободного времени у меня не особо много в связи с учебой и ближайшими сессиями. не обещаю, но надеюсь, что на каникулах смогу что-то

10

8 Mar 2026, 08:31 UTC132 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

дорогие дамы, поздравляю нас с 8 марта! я очень благодарна, что в этот день женщины смогли добиться справедливости и равенства, и я верю, что дальше будет только лучше❣️ даже если опускаются руки и кажется, что все усилия были напрасны, продолжайте верить в себя и свои силы. желаю нам всем достигнуть высот, исполнить свои желания и жить эту жизнь счастливо!

14

17 Feb 2026, 19:22 UTC344 views30 reactions7 Starsread 10 August 2026
Video

♥️#yunei #1003grp охххх я успеваю ура (у меня уже травма от этого тренда)

custom 525135749234822007113custom 52472212498636021589custom 52467160500404547068

13 Feb 2026, 18:43 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

мне стало смешно, так что че бы не поделиться и здесь

custom 53728339292816803985

13 Feb 2026, 18:42 UTC116 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

я щас улечу ребят

custom 53728339292816803986

17 Jan 2026, 19:56 UTC194 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

этому коллабу сегодня год мой прайм + я оч люблю коллабы с дашей знаете надо еще

custom 53728339292816803986custom 52472485057260753362

15 Jan 2026, 17:06 UTC165 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

любимая реакция 🌈🌈

custom 53728339292816803989

15 Jan 2026, 17:02 UTC157 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ладненька, спасибо всем, кто писал сообщения — их, пожалуй, я оставлю в канале (по крайней мере, пусть побудят тут некоторое время), — доброй ночи!

custom 53728339292816803988

15 Jan 2026, 15:16 UTC155 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

привет привет!! как ты? хорошенько отдохни после деланья эдита, он ОЧЕНЬ классный правда я искренне тобой восхищаюсь, ты умница!! я не знаю что спросить, так что просто надеюсь что ты впорядке удачи в освоении ае!! привет! я хорошо, что насчет вас? спасибо огромное за эти слова, мне очень приятно 😭😭😭 благодаря таким словам моя вера в себя постепенно растёт 🥰 вам тоже удачи

custom 53728339292816803988

15 Jan 2026, 15:07 UTCviews —

аюхуипин ;3 pinned «добрый вечерр! напоминаю о вчерашнем эдите и предлагаю вам поговорить и позадавать мне вопросы в анон, так как давно у меня на канале такого не было 😉 было бы приятно увидеть там сообщение от вас 💝»

15 Jan 2026, 15:06 UTC111 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

юнеи, привет, это ландо, спешу сообщить, что даша твоя фанатка передай даше, что я тоже ее фанатка 🥰 ландо, давай коллаб

custom 52472485057260753363custom 53728339292816803983custom 52447621663382889302

15 Jan 2026, 15:05 UTC123 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Когда коллаб? да хоть сегодня, пишите в лс с предложением. а если серьезно, то… через несколько эдитов возможно, потому что сейчас я хочу попрактиковаться в ае, и хорошенько освоить это приложение 😌 это тот же самый анон, который спрашивает у меня это уже в 3 (-4???) раз?

custom 53728339292816803984custom 52472485057260753363

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FW3CK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,958 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“аюхуипин ;3” (@FW3CK), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FW3CK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.