Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FROM ALL AROUND

@FROMALLAROUND

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001737453873
TypeChannel
Username@FROMALLAROUND
DescriptionBe respectful... we all want truth
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FROMALLAROUND

Growth

77 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6–8 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:167no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:267first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
303.6%
avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
Avg views / post
21.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total425
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,770
Videos
2,530
Links
5,170

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @childrenshdVideo

Perfectly healthy one day, dead the next after vaccination? If the vaccines aren’t the cause, what is? SEN. RON JOHNSON: “The Pilgrim study said about 1% of adverse events are reported.” “And when you look at the Covid deaths … 24% of the over 39,000 deaths reported to VAERS occurred on the day of vaccination or one or two days later.”

12 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @covid19vaccinevictimsVideo

Dr. Ben Carson urges, "Do NOT allow what was done during COVID to be 'swept under the rug'." "Dr. Fauci admitted there was no science behind ANY of what he was saying." "We know the side effects from COVID vaccinations far exceed anything else in the last 30 years combined." Foolow: @Covid19vaccinevictims

12 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC25 viewsread 12 August 2026

Because of the endless lies with the COVID vaccines, many parents are now asking how to know if any vaccine is safe, effective or necessary for their child. It's a surprisingly complex question and here I show why most vaccines have no minimal benefit. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-to-determine-the-risks-and-benefits

12 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @VigilantFoxVideo

An outraged Ainsley Earhardt says the RAGE of mothers who lost unborn babies to the COVID shot is going to unleash HELL on “the experts” who told us it was safe. Now even people like Meghan McCain are saying Fauci needs to be JAILED. EARHARDT: “This is going to open a whole new can of worms. People are going to SUE because they’re going to be so upset about this.” “They lost their children... How many children are

12 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026

OPRAH: “All these years, I thought I was overeating... because of me and my fault. Now I understand that if you carry the OBESITY GENE... that is what makes you overeat.” “You don’t overeat and become obese. Obesity causes you to overeat.” DR. PAUL SALADINO: "There is NO obesity gene... Oprah got on The View... and said, 'I have the fat gene.' NO, YOU DON’T, Oprah!" “You may have a predisposition to more food nois

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FROMALLAROUND. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FROM ALL AROUND” (@FROMALLAROUND), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FROMALLAROUND.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.