这个节目里没有李厚辰对自己无知和无能的困惑,毕竟他还能给别人找十几二十种解释,这怎么可能是无知和无能呢?整个节目其实就是对他心目中的”大多数人”这个他者的指控罢了。https://www.xiaoyuzhoufm.com/episode/631b47091f19f8e3ff4c3cad

Channel
原翻电听众的魔怔咨询诊疗记录
@FPRLisnterTherapyRecord
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001593810147 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FPRLisnterTherapyRecord |
| Description | 本频道为听翻电听到魔怔和迷茫的听众的互助小组的讨论精选。小组采取拉康式的可变咨询制度,随时可以结束咨询和诊疗(指退群),并且除非你真的不想听翻电或者不魔怔,不保证你真的能不听翻电和不魔怔。 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FPRLisnterTherapyRecord |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 125 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 125 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 31 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
最让我无法接受的是这个视频甚至都不暗示一下也许我们应该帮助二舅,哪怕是以捐钱之类的肤浅的方式。在他生活的村子里,一个老人家里的电器坏了还要另一个残疾的老人特地过去看是出了什么问题,我不知道有多少人会想一下为什么这个村子里已经没有年轻人来做这类事情,只靠一个勤劳的多才多艺的残疾的老人来包办一切。而他本人没有所谓的“精神内耗”,过着“从不后悔一直向前看”的生活这点,只是让人毫无罪恶感地享受他(以及被感动到的观众自己的)平凡的挣扎罢了:https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1MN4y177PB
一名阳性经历了各种事情的药学生的分享:【【自新时代第一期】赤坂羽:上海异闻录——新时代求生法则-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/S5TVTRO
如果有一天互联网死去了,这首歌会和制作人员名单一起播放:https://buzaichang.xyz/episodes/the-mysterious-song
我给拉康话术生成器生成的文本找了一下原文对照
Channel name was changed to «原翻电听众的魔怔咨询诊疗记录»
这个频道和讨论组会逐渐开始去翻电化的流程,争取在可以接受的时间内完成,欢迎各种想讨论哲学和精神分析的朋友参与讨论
我已经被@#pekingcat# 李厚辰给拉黑了。我在他的那篇文章评论区里,除了上一条动态的补充以及图1里的一句感谢,没有任何别的发言了。 而在图1中提到的“梅诗金自己就提到过lawgiver”的原文中英对照如图2,显然,这里说出李厚辰引用的那句话的人是列别杰夫的外甥。 而他引用的两篇论文,第二篇《Dostoevsky and Swedenborg》并没有提到梅诗金公爵和卢梭的关系,只是分别在不同的部分提及,而《Religious Portraiture in Dostoevsky's Notes From the House of The Dead:: Representing the Abraham Faiths》(评论区里提到的论文名有误)更是连卢梭(Rousseau)一词都没有提到。 后面贴出来的各种论文恕我无法一一去查证。 请问这到底是怎么一回事呢?李厚辰在翻电原节目里论证”公爵是卢梭式的立法者“这一观点我…
我(Baka影)是个不满意对方就要说对方有所有(可能有的)问题的人吗?
- 是36%
- 否64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
这个列表基本上包含了所有我认为翻电最近一年左右最糟糕的节目,也能看出李厚辰对自己内容的反思有多少。叠了这么多个形容词的“时代”,然而当你说要躺平,或者很多事情的选择只能两恶相权取其轻的时候,他又会第一个跳出来告诉你“要克服厌世”,“事情没有这么糟糕”,好像突然间一切生活的问题又能通过个体下定决心去生活就能解决。
大家好,今天又是处于礼崩乐坏时代、残忍年代、恐惧年代、后精英教育时代的一天。
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @FPRLisnterTherapyRecord. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
我(Baka影)是个不满意对方就要说对方有所有(可能有的)问题的人吗?
- 是36%
- 否64%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2021 to 9 September 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 585,064 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“原翻电听众的魔怔咨询诊疗记录” (@FPRLisnterTherapyRecord), 125 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FPRLisnterTherapyRecord.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.