Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LNGSHOT4SHO. #16thTrackOfLouis

@FOURSHOBOlZ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003681808684
TypeChannel
Username@FOURSHOBOlZ
DescriptionFor LNGSHOT's Projects @FOURSHOBOT
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 10 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FOURSHOBOlZ

Growth

1236 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 122–124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:03123no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:47123first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Videos
3
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

710 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆14220.0%
🔥11716.5%
9713.7%
❤‍🔥8712.3%
8512.0%
🆒578.03%
💯456.34%
👾324.51%
💊253.52%
💘233.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 710reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2026, 03:00 UTC≈13,700 views139 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ 𝘔𝘐𝘟𝘛𝘈𝘗𝘌 : Moonwalkin' To Track One. LOCKED-IN 💫' “Bred-For-The Booth.” 𝘓𝘕𝘎𝘚𝘏𝘖𝘛’𝘚 ㅤ/ㅤ 𝘎𝘖𝘋-𝘛𝘐𝘌𝘙 𝘝𝘖𝘐𝘊𝘌. 𝘜𝘕𝘔𝘌𝘕𝘛𝘖𝘙𝘌𝘋: 💽 NEW-TAPE-DROP. ( Build From Bedrock ) Voice Untrained Yet Untirely His Own. / Gold-Hued Tempo Tight. Controlled, Never-Chasing-Gold. The Laidback Vocalist, Louis Lim. 🎙 with #16ThTRACKOFLOUIS.

🏆44❤‍🔥29🔥2686💊6💘6🆒6

28 Apr 2026, 03:00 UTC≈3,100 views127 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ㅤㅤ Louis Lim—once merely a boy—now cleaving through silence with a voice composed yet resolute. Tempo restrained, never stagnant. Emotion unfurls smiliar fragile mixtape. A private pursuit evolves ceremonial—resilience tempered by softness. Every resonance chronicles his ascent. On a stage devoid of doubt, ardour meets endurance. Proper monumental, that. ㅤㅤ 𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗦𝗧𝗬𝗟𝗘 𝗔𝗟𝗕𝗨𝗠. ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‌‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‌‎ ‎ ‎

🔥472016🏆16🆒7💊6❤‍🔥5👾5

28 Apr 2026, 02:58 UTC≈1,280 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👾1

7 Mar 2026, 04:51 UTC≈2,350 views55 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ㅤ (INFINITE DARN; REMÖLDED.) %0208 🚏 ALL—ROUNDER—WOOJIN HTTP://S.T.A.R-ON-THE-SPOT Into something astounding for those walking by, the way his visuals spread round the city, wadding graffiti-covered hedges, implicitly dispatched that teen days is a one-time thing. Rain poured down on the urban center, the sun's blazes piercing the bordering foliage; HIS POSTERS HADN'T PE

15❤‍🔥8🏆8👾6🆒64💘4🔥4

7 Mar 2026, 04:50 UTC≈7,840 views73 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ WHEELS PASS BY BEFORE THE .★. FROTHY ROAFSIDE * (?) ➕ ── LIGHTS BROAD #INF1NEIGHTWOOJIN His Names And Chores Are Penned On Them ▸ 🚦 “NEVER-CHANGING, So4RIN’ HIGH” Devoirsing Stars, And Descend Plumbly Onto The Str

🏆2112❤‍🔥12🆒7👾5💊54🔥4

20 Jan 2026, 02:05 UTC≈3,800 views84 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ The Clocks Keep Ticktockin’ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤSoliciting For The Lost Tape Deck ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ B.A.N.G! ─── (오율) ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🌐ㅤㅤ • • • PRIME WON’T COME ACROSS TWOFOLD. LAUDS TO THE UNBROKEN BEAT .:: Piecemeal, you don’t have to peer ahead to scan the stars. What you can frankly find is wide-ranging you; on the side of the road, when you see a young buck in baggy jeans and a pendant dossaling from it, there you

21❤‍🔥1613🏆12🆒10🔥7👾5

20 Jan 2026, 02:04 UTC≈10,200 views98 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤTIME’S THIEF 🚹 BLEEDING PASS ㅤㅤㅤHANGING ON THE JEANS, (20TH.) ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤMESS AMONG_XXX ───── ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ➕:⚡️ ROØTED STREƏT ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ #POCKET20NEFOROHYUL ㅤㅤWe Pause to Rule Axiom World. Whatever, ㅤㅤ ㅤ Don’t Due Halt for Being Trendy. ㅤㅤ Living On Our Own—Recede is Barred. MEANDERING DOWN THE CITY AS YOU’RE THE ONLY ONE POCKET LEFT ㅤ

🏆26💯211810💘7❤‍🔥4👾4💊4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @FOURSHOBOlZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,071 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LNGSHOT4SHO. #16thTrackOfLouis” (@FOURSHOBOlZ), 123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FOURSHOBOlZ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.