Channel
@FNDXX
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
647subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001428638470 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FNDXX |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FNDXX |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 647 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 649 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 655 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 663 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 663 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (30 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 448 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$WDC beat Q4 earnings and revenue estimates, but shares plunged more than 14% premarket as investors were unimpressed by its guidance. With such an impressive reaction, is a move to $400 realistic?
$AMD posted record Q2 2026 results and raised its long-term AI outlook, but the stock still slipped in premarket trading. With $SPY near all-time highs and the market rallying over the past two days, can AMD at least reclaim the $500 level today?
$BTDR shares jumped 23% premarket after signing a 16-year, $4.7B AI data center lease in Norway with Volta. The deal covers 121 MW of AI computing capacity and could reach $8B with an eight-year extension. But with half the premarket gains already gone, is a test of the high still in play?
GameStop $GME shares fell more than 11% in premarket trading after the company announced an agreement to exchange about $1.4 billion of its outstanding convertible senior notes for Class A common stock. Not the best time for meme season, so will the stock end the day even lower than the premarket low?
$META ’s Q2 EPS missed expectations while revenue beat, but free cash flow plunged 91% and the outlook disappointed as AI costs surged. Is there a 99% chance the stock will at least test the post-market low after the open?
Who noticed that $SNDK is already cut in half from its not-so-recent all-time high? And was yesterday’s blockbuster CXMT market debut just the final shot in the AI bubble?
$TSLA record Q2 deliveries (480k+) & $28.2B revenue crushed by $5.8B CapEx surge (+142%). Margins collapsed to 1.4%, FCF turned negative (-$1.1B). Stock plunged 14.5% as investors fear AI spending is outpacing returns. Is this too much risk for a trillion-dollar valuation, or the ultimate buying opportunity before the Robotaxi/Optimus explosion? 🤖
European chipmaker $STM beat Q2 estimates on Thursday, but Q3 sales guidance came in light. No support on the chart, will it end the day below $50?
Super Micro Computer $SMCI surged after hours after a preliminary update showed record $60B backlog and Q4 gross margin guidance jumping to 15%–17% from 8.2%–8.4%. Will we see at least the same intraday move as the overnight gap?
$SG surged about 14% Friday, ending a four-day slide and bouncing back after a 26% drop earlier in the week tied to a Cyclospora outbreak linked to Taco Bell lettuce. Will the weak second half of last session keep the stock from closing the gap up?
Netflix shares fell as much as 8% Thursday after results underwhelmed investors. Revenue of $12.56B and slower growth guidance of 11.7% added to Wall Street jitters. No daily support here is a move lower toward the 50-55$ level next?
Worst day in nearly 40 years $IBM after the surprise earnings miss. Please don’t say that $ORCL is next.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FNDXX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Трейдинг на NYSE з Fondexx” (@FNDXX), 647 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FNDXX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.