Need an OTC deal (a buyer) for BTC. If anyone can help broker or know someone. Drop me a dm at @FlintXBT
👏1🔥1

Channel
@FLINTCrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
869subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001526848653 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FLINTCrypto |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FLINTCrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 869 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 874 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 878 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 879 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 879 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 42.9% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Need an OTC deal (a buyer) for BTC. If anyone can help broker or know someone. Drop me a dm at @FlintXBT
👏1🔥1
Followup plan was to short $80.6 but closed it. Will re evaluate tomorrow.
👏1
Took me out BE and hit final Tp.
🔥1
High Impact News May 4 - May 8 / 2026 •EUR volatility expected due to upcoming ECB signals and weak growth data •Euro sensitive to inflation surprises, especially any upside moves •Crypto markets preparing for volatility around the FOMC rate decision •NFP data seen as a key driver; strong jobs likely to boost USD •Nasdaq (NQ) near highs with strong momentum but increasing pullback risk •Tech earnings supporting NQ, …
This is a joke lmao
Got out of this position. Dont think we go to 80s
👍1
ETH 4H Time Frame Looking for lower pricing on ETH. Kinda weak compared to BTC
Want to long 76 till 80.6 on $btc if given
👏1
High Impact News April 27 - May 1 / 2026 ●Intel surge lifts Nasdaq Composite & S&P 500 to record highs ●Nasdaq at ATH on tech rally + Iran ceasefire optimism ●Bitcoin falls on risk-off from Hormuz tensions ●Donald Trump signals continued Hormuz blockade → slower de-escalation ●Markets highly sensitive to Trump’s Iran stance (drives volatility) ●USD strengthens ahead of PMI; strong data = further upside ●Dollar suppo…
👏1
This idea is invalidated, as price reacted first with green line and later with red. Also we saw a huge push above red, which also is not favourable.
ETH 2H Time Frame Plan the trade, trade the plan. Fundamentally BTC should be pushing higher while technically Lower. So being conservative I need a deviation above Red line and Follow through below Green line in order to get in.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz today triggered a risk-off sentiment in global markets, as concerns over oil supply and geopolitical tensions increased, leading investors to move toward safer assets and resulting in a decline in Bitcoin.
👍2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FLINTCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Flint Crypto” (@FLINTCrypto), 869 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FLINTCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.