Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Физрук мир танков

Channel

Физрук мир танков

@FIZRUK11

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002174950286
TypeChannel
Username@FIZRUK11
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FIZRUK11

Growth

548 August 2026 — 54 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:0154no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:1754first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.4%
avg views ÷ 54 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.4
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (8 March 20269 August 2026)
Views total164
Reactions total22
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
330
Videos
14
Links
156

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩1435.9%
🔥1333.3%
👍410.3%
25.13%
😁25.13%
🤝25.13%
🏆12.56%
🤣12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC9 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mirash_avPhoto

🎆Бойцы, уже завтра 10.08.2026г состоится 2 сезон "Какой-то турнир"🎆 ✏️24 стримера ✏️8 команд ✏️По правилам турнира Чака ✏️Призовой фонд 50 000💸+30% от донатов организатора 1️⃣Команда - BALHISS, CoJIucTKa, Luniakeya - Боевые Милфы Балхиса 2️⃣Команда - _Marian, Mirash_AV, _Leslis_ - Любители пшеничного смузи 3️⃣Команда - laqwiner, SCORPIO_TV, dr0faa - БЕЗ БАБ И БАБОК 4️⃣Команда - NekweLL, Мерзавка, kinderplaay - МАК

1👍1🔥1🤝1

8 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC13 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mirash_avPhoto

✏️Жеребьёвка прошла и известны первые матчи каждой команды. ✏️После каждого этапа Швейцарки будет жеребьёвка матчей на следующий. ✏️Если кто-то забыл кто в какой команде ✏️Проведение турнира с 10 по 16 августа. 💰Пополнить призовой фоннд турнира тут💰 #какой_то_турнир_2

👍1🔥1🤝1🤩1

7 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🏆1🤩1

7 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Думаю эти танки подойдут для турика

🔥1🤩1

7 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC14 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @mirash_avPhoto

Команды придумали себе названия😂 За "МАК" не подзабанят? 😂😂😂 Или "КустУстрицы" - что имелось ввиду?😂😂😂 Вопросики конечно😂будем разбираться завтра на стриме где будет проходить жеребьёвка первых матчей 8.08.2016 в 18.00 МСК ✏️Проведение турнира с 10 по 16 августа. 💰Пополнить призовой фоннд турнира тут💰 Кто ваши фавориты? Пишите👇 #какой_то_турнир_2

👍1🔥1🤣1🤩1

28 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Foch 155 — все вы знаете эту ПТ, неприметную, которая где-то валяется у вас в ангаре. Но танчик неплохой, и с точностью проблем нет: «Торнадо» нервно курит в сторонке. Взял на этом танке отметки и скажу, что аппарат довольно неплохой: порой снаряды залетают в «пиксели», поворот корпуса довольно неплохой — как будто и ругать его не за что. Моя оценка танка — 8 из 10.

🔥1🤩1

27 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Tornade — новый кал ой танк от Лесты. Ну что я могу сказать: танк имеет барабан на 3 снаряда с альфой в 750 ед. Танк быстрый, в целом всё. Ахаха! Минусы я уже все и забыл, так как с момента, когда я взял отметки, прошло немало времени. Но что запомнилось, так это его плохая точность. Да и плюс, он картонный и фугасы принимает на раз-два. Мне не понравился данный танк. Дам ему 6 из 10.

🤩2👍1🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 22:18 UTC64 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

BZT-70 — танк 11-го уровня. Танк для расслабления: на нем не нужно «потеть» — выехал, свелся, дал залп и ждешь 20 секунд. В качестве основных снарядов используются БОПСы, также есть хорошие ББ и фугасы. Обязательно возите около 6 штук ББ, так как зачастую под вас будут выезжать бортом. Сейчас многие привыкли, что против БОПСов нужно играть бортом, и для BZT это только на руку: ББ с альфой в 1000 единиц, к тому же,

🔥1🤩1

25 Jun 2026, 22:26 UTC54 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Т-42, ст. 8-го уровня. Взял на нём 3 отметки за 105 боёв. Долго привыкал к нему, так как он довольно медленно разгонялся. Вкратце: мощности двигателя нет, так что лучше использовать боновую турбину. Точность нормальная, КД с пивком сойдёт. Есть даже небольшая броня в башне, так как у неё она как клюв. В целом танк нормальный, играбельный, дам ему 8 из 10.

🔥1🤩1

24 Apr 2026, 21:00 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Об. 757. Нурс. ПТ довольно токсичная, в данный момент она реально бесит. Когда я брал отметки, я понял, что бесил сильно игроков, так как чат летел порой с ненормативной лексикой. Многие говорят, что 757 лучше МТ-58, и это реально так, только из-за барабана. Если ты один снаряд не попал, то второй можно. А у МТ-58 из-за КД 16 секунд таких ошибок, как промах, допускать нельзя. Об. 757 — это скорее СТ, чем ПТ, поэто

🔥2🤩1

23 Apr 2026, 19:17 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Закрыли данный танк

🔥1🤩1

19 Apr 2026, 07:33 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что могу сказать: наконец-то мы это сделали. Бурасик — один из сложных танков для получения трех отметок на восьмом уровне. Куча минусов: УВН, повороты, пробитие, косое орудие. Не танк, а бедолага. Очень скиллозависимый. Обычному игроку взять на нем три отметки, как будто, нереально. Плюсов в этом танке я как будто не вижу. Вердикт: танк очень сложный и неприятный. Поставлю ему отвратительную оценку (сугубо мое мнени

🔥2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @FIZRUK11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,231,713 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Физрук мир танков” (@FIZRUK11), 54 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FIZRUK11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.