Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

️️ФК RED HILL BY NISHMAN

@FCREDHILL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

297subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002072387195
TypeChannel
Username@FCREDHILL
DescriptionОфициальный Telegram-канал ФК «RED HILL» ✍️ Сотрудничество/реклама: @monesybo, @RIKMSK Наш ВК: https://vk.com/lfk_red_hill Наш YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOEF7KgyZgohAVbqc3GROHw
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FCREDHILL

Growth

2977 Aug 2026, 14:19 — 297 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:04 — 297 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:198 Aug 2026, 08:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:04297no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:19297first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
461
Videos
187
Links
219

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 22s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

398 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11228.1%
👍7418.6%
custom 53639173194771575874411.1%
379.30%
custom 5330156600197936857276.78%
😁225.53%
👏184.52%
🤣184.52%
custom 5456140674028019486112.76%
🤡82.01%
😢71.76%
🤝61.51%
🤯61.51%
custom 542482984704410942251.26%
💩20.503%
👎10.251%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 398reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2025 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FCREDHILL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 August 2025 to 9 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2025, 06:18 UTC963 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как быстро вы отгадали в голосовании 🔥

👏9🔥6👍41

9 Oct 2025, 05:45 UTC694 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Кто сможет забить мяч в такие ворота? 🥅 ⚽️ Кто самый везучий профик в команде

  1. Ars30%
  2. Шира12%
  3. Кот58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Oct 2025, 13:18 UTC641 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А вот как Шира и Арс работают на точность #челлендж Арс - ❤️ Шира (Аlex) - 🔥

👍11🔥86👎1💩1🤣1

5 Oct 2025, 07:40 UTC633 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня у нас первый полуфинальный матч Лиги Москвы против команды Бантер Групп Играем первую игру на выезде Поддержите нас на трансляции 🔥 https://vkvideo.ru/video-156645702_456240139?list=7613a760b650c5fbc7

7🔥6👍4custom 53639173194771575872

30 Sept 2025, 14:57 UTC694 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кулинарное шоу: Яичница 🍳 от Ефима Слабонервным не смотреть 🫣

🤣12😢7custom 54248298470441094225👏2🤡2🤯2😁2custom 53639173194771575872

27 Sept 2025, 08:13 UTC902 views35 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Что творит этот парень Мирза, а какая у него прическа 💇‍♂️ 🤣 Заслуживает вашей реакции 🔥

🔥15👍8👏72🤯2🤣1

26 Sept 2025, 17:14 UTC977 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Пятничные девятки от Федора Моисеева Всем хороших выходных 🔞

👍14🔥7custom 54561406740280194866custom 53639173194771575873

25 Sept 2025, 12:28 UTC861 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А пока все снимаются в ролике, Рама занимается важным делом🤣 18+

😁14🔥7🤡6🤣4🤯2custom 53639173194771575872

24 Sept 2025, 15:02 UTC480 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Дорогие друзья, в эти выходные встречались в ответном матче 1/4 финала Лиги Москвы с командой Парма Первую игру дома обыграли их 12:3, а во второй на выезде 13:2 Трансляции не было, но зато есть нарезка наших голов и нереализованных моментов 🤣 Приятного просмотра 🔥 Напишите в комментариях чей гол вам больше всего понравился 👇

custom 53639173194771575879🔥7custom 533015660019793685762💩1

23 Sept 2025, 20:29 UTC474 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥7👍6custom 53301566001979368575custom 53639173194771575872

23 Sept 2025, 20:28 UTC670 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥9custom 53301566001979368576😁5custom 53639173194771575871

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @FCREDHILL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Oct 2025, 05:45 UTCAnonymous Poll50 voters

Кто сможет забить мяч в такие ворота? 🥅 ⚽️ Кто самый везучий профик в команде

  1. Ars30%
  2. Шира12%
  3. Кот58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2025 to 9 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“️️ФК RED HILL BY NISHMAN” (@FCREDHILL), 297 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FCREDHILL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.