Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FC LOM MEDIA

Channel

FC LOM MEDIA

@FCLOM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

249subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678208007
TypeChannel
Username@FCLOM
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FCLOM

Growth

24925325112 August 2026 — 249 subscribers12 August 2026 — 249 subscribers19 August 2026 — 253 subscribers26 August 2026 — 251 subscribers10 September 2026 — 249 subscribers12 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 248–254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:36249-2
26 Aug 2026, 03:56251-2
19 Aug 2026, 04:26253+4
12 Aug 2026, 12:15249no change
12 Aug 2026, 12:03249first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5244.8%
💔1916.4%
💊108.62%
❤‍🔥97.76%
custom 536642893474748088376.03%
👎54.31%
👾54.31%
💘54.31%
🔥43.45%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC113 viewsread 12 August 2026

кстати деркач бухал два дня подряд мвп

9 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC112 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

прошли кстати в 1/4 если кому интересно

3

20 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC285 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

еще короче на 14 месте идем

💔3👎21

20 Jul 2026, 11:52 UTC291 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

если че, вчера проебали 6:1 воркам

💔3👎2

8 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC407 viewsread 12 August 2026

он не выпинывал а целился в ворота

8 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC265 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @perm_mfl

👉 Голосование за лучший гол 5-го тура 👈

17 Jun 2026, 14:04 UTC509 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Третий тур! Играем с командой «Аврора» уже встречались с ними в рамках «Friendly Cup», где выиграли их со счетом 2:0. Заряжаемся только на победу и ждем болельщиков FC LOM

7custom 53664289347474808836

14 Jun 2026, 15:56 UTC353 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Проигрываем второй матч со счетом 2:4 Отметились: Карповский х2(п) джокер По статистике xG и ударам выигрываем, но храмает реализация. По игре пропускаем первые в ближний угол от джокера, далее во втором тайме пропускаем после выноса от ворот. Забиваем с пенальти джокером и пытались дальше давить соперников, но Инкар играл в пародию на футбол и постоянно выпинывали мяч. В итоге не успеваем сравнивать и на последней

💔65💊4custom 53664289347474808831

13 Jun 2026, 15:35 UTC271 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10❤‍🔥5💘5

10 Jun 2026, 17:35 UTC312 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Играем второй тур Пермской Медиалиги против Инкар Ждем болельщиков, вход свободный 14.06 19:00 Школа№55 Вагонная 22 FC LOM

8❤‍🔥4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FCLOM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FC LOM MEDIA” (@FCLOM), 249 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FCLOM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.