Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙁𝙊𝙍 𝙔𝙊𝙔𝙊 𖢲

Channel

𝙁𝙊𝙍 𝙔𝙊𝙔𝙊 𖢲

@F7VFF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195284224
TypeChannel
Username@F7VFF
Created16 August 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/F7VFF

Growth

1521541538 August 2026 — 154 subscribers8 August 2026 — 154 subscribers16 August 2026 — 152 subscribers24 August 2026 — 153 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:47153+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:06152-2
8 Aug 2026, 19:00154no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:30154first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
186.9%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
286
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held17 (16 August 20246 August 2026)
Views total2,002
Reactions total192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

571 reactions across 15 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊7513.1%
💯7413.0%
5910.3%
custom 6044241745481307049315.43%
custom 6044304507838402773264.55%
custom 5287319472560953220254.38%
custom 6041772809301004771254.38%
custom 6043972416672109531244.20%
custom 6043996369704718304223.85%
custom 5413548445426270186213.68%
custom 6043938984646677658213.68%
custom 4992700727693412613203.50%
custom 5458546186426272329203.50%
custom 6043841003557753450203.50%
custom 6044319523044070161203.50%
custom 4992417874032198675193.33%
custom 4992414072986141884162.80%
custom 5433840482272690343152.63%
122.10%
💋91.58%
4 further kinds172.98%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 571reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC94 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026

8:38

custom 60439963697047183047custom 60443045078384027737custom 60439724166721095316custom 60438410035577534505custom 60442417454813070494custom 60417728093010047713custom 60439389846466776582

3 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC145 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

إذا الكرامة ثمنها الوحدة... أهلاً بالوحدة. وإذا الصدق يخليك غريب... يكفيني إني أعرف نفسي.

custom 60443195230440701617custom 60442417454813070495custom 60443045078384027735custom 60438410035577534504custom 60439389846466776584custom 60439963697047183044custom 60417728093010047713

1 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC554 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 60438410035577534507custom 60439724166721095317custom 60443195230440701616custom 60442417454813070494custom 60443045078384027734custom 60439963697047183043custom 60417728093010047712

1 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC364 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اين سيگون ألـقاء.؟

custom 60442417454813070498custom 60417728093010047715custom 60439724166721095315custom 60439963697047183045custom 60443195230440701614custom 60439389846466776583custom 60443045078384027733

31 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC298 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

يگولون العيون مراية الروح، وروحي من الفركه صارت منسيّه. لو تباوع بعيوني تعرف شكثر انكسرت، بيهن ألف قصة حزن... وما تنحچي كلّه.

custom 60417728093010047717custom 60442417454813070496custom 60439389846466776585custom 60438410035577534504custom 60439724166721095313custom 60439963697047183043custom 60443045078384027733

29 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC488 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

تاليتك ترد مـلههوف

custom 60439389846466776587custom 60417728093010047715custom 60442417454813070494custom 60443045078384027734custom 60439724166721095313custom 60443195230440701613custom 60443228043990839983

23 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC201 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💋97💯6🍓5💔5❤‍🔥4

20 Jun 2026, 18:58 UTC428 views188 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الـمتاح لا يـناسبني، 😃🪑

🕊64💯5750custom 49924178740321986755custom 54135484454262701865custom 52873194725609532204custom 49927007276934126133

20 Jun 2026, 15:26 UTC579 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026

چـبيرة جـࢪوحنه. ونضـحك الخاطـركم.

🕊7💯65custom 54585461864262723295custom 54135484454262701864custom 52873194725609532203custom 49924140729861418842

12 Jun 2026, 08:57 UTC564 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الاهـمال ب اهمـال.

custom 49924140729861418846💯5custom 541354844542627018643🕊3custom 49924178740321986753custom 52873194725609532203

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @F7VFF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 460,607 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙁𝙊𝙍 𝙔𝙊𝙔𝙊 𖢲” (@F7VFF), 153 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F7VFF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.