4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 23:24
138
+30
16 Aug 2026, 17:46
108
+13
9 Aug 2026, 12:32
95
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:46
95
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.6%
avg views ÷ 138 subscribers
Avg views / post
60.1
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
17 (1 August 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
1,022
Reactions total
70
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
36
51.4%
⚡
14
20.0%
👍
11
15.7%
❤
9
12.9%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Everyone around you understand that tiktok slideshows are the best way to:
- Make people know your brand
- Market anything you want
- Monetise content effectively
And you're still wondering if you should join the Eyeballs Method
Over there you will get:
- Automated content creation bot (100's of posts in a few mins)
- Everything you need to know from A to Z to create content, funnels and monetisation
- 1on1 mento…
The worst thing you can do is to do nothing
When you don't know what to do
Don't just sit there and do nothing
DO SOMETHING
Because:
DOING SOMETHING >>> DOING NOTHING
Action leads to success
Inaction leads to a miserable life
Started this account today
Got 6k views the first day
15 telegram channel joins
Without a link in bio
Too easy
It will compound
1k joins per day within 1 week
When you're first starting out, you're trying to make as much money as possible
You do anything to get the cash
The problem is, chasing the $$$ is fine but there becomes a point where you can't scale
This is why you NEED software and people working for you
That's why I started this Telegram channel
To bring light to the Eyeballs Method and the fact you can LITERALLY get others to make the money for you
If you w…
There are 3 things you can sell online:
1. Info
2. Service
3. Product
The easiest thing to sell is info
When someone buys info from you, upsell them with service
When you have clout, sell products
How to scale your brand:
Hire people from discord groups to create tiktok accounts and post content daily for $50/100k views
Use Eyeballs Method to mass create 100's of posts
Funnel views to your brand
Scale with more accounts
TAKE MORE RISKS
One thing I learned on my journey
It might sound obvious but if you:
- are afraid
- don't take action
- don't take the risk
You won't make it in life
Everyday you must step out of your comfort zone
Do this:
- draw a circle
- inside of the circle write things you have
- outside of the circle write things you want
Now do you know what does the circle represents?
The circle is your comfort zone
…
My posters make more money than YOU...
Think about that
Some of you haven't even started trying to make money online yet
If it's not today, when will it be?
I'm getting DMs on a daily basis about how they can start the Eyeballs Method
- Adopt the mindset to win
- Listen to the previous voice notes
- Read through the free sauce
If you're wanting to learn the method👇
It is £90 to join the private group and learn…
I tried online business but I failed
Tried dropshipping and Etsy digital products
Nothing works...
___
I received this message today from one of you
It is not the issue of the business model not working
There are people making millions from all of it
It is always the problem of not having the right information
If you have it, it is literally a shortcut to success
But the valuable information isn't for free
…
What they say you need:
- Rich parents
- Brand new laptop
- The newest business hacks
What's ACTUALLY enough:
- Wifi
- Basic laptop
- Eyeballs Method
Don't get overwhelmed.
It's not rocket science.
👍3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @EyeballsMethod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 385,437 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EYEBALLS METHOD” (@EyeballsMethod), 138 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EyeballsMethod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.