Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Religion of no peace

@ExposingMomo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

504subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002576440037
TypeChannel
Username@ExposingMomo
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ExposingMomo

Growth

504505504.57 Aug 2026, 15:55 — 505 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:16 — 505 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:48 — 504 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:558 Aug 2026, 12:48
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 504–505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:48504-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:16505no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:55505first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.1%
avg views ÷ 504 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (3 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,430
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 06s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱1218.2%
🔥1015.2%
😁1015.2%
🤬69.09%
👍57.58%
🤮57.58%
💯46.06%
🤯46.06%
🥴46.06%
😈23.03%
🙈23.03%
11.52%
🦄11.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

final graphs there's 2x more chronic malnutrition in indonesia, malaysia, syria than in gaza lmao

🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC234 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Muslim after murdering millions - lecture about secualsim and humanity 🤬

👍2

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC53 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Shia women and Kids march through the streets of Iran 🇺🇸Michigan as they observe Maatam.

🤯3🤬2

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC49 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

In 🇨🇦Canada a Muslim Migrant says to a Canadian guy - "This is my country. Don't come here. Nobody wants to see you "

🤬4

6 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC233 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👇More detailed 💩 https://lib.eshia.ir/71860/43/42

🥴4

6 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC51 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IslamicGoatsPhoto

Mohammed relationship with his daughter fatima. Muhammad would not sleep until he nuzzled his face in his daughter Fatima's bosom ( breast) (Behaar al Anwaar, Al Maglisi, v. 43, p. 42 - 42 ) .ص ،43.ج للمجلسي األنوار بحار الباقر والصادق )عليهما السالم( أنه كان النبي )صلى هللا عليه وآله( ال ينام حتى يقبل عرض وجه فاطمة، يضع وجهه بين ثديي فاطمة ويدعو لها، وفي رواية حتى يقبل عرض وجنة فاطمة أو بين .ثدييها Fatima's fac

🤮4

6 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Where Islam goes terror and decay follows.

😈2

5 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC309 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

54 yrs old Mohammad - did with 6yrs old aisha . If that is justified - this is justified as well . If this not pedophilea mf - just blow up 💣

😱5

5 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC258 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Aisha was 6 -.no debate 🫯 Aisha was 18 - when mohammed died - no remarriage .

🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IslamicGoats

Posted without readable text

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Mohammad permitted killing kafir kids 👏.

😱4👍1

5 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC408 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Not just 72 virgins 😂 ✅ Ghilman / Young Boys in Heaven 1. Quran 52:24 “And there will circulate among them young boys (ghilman) for them, as if they were pearls well-protected.” 2. Quran 56:17 “There will circulate among them immortal youths (wildan mukhalladun).” 3. Quran 76:19 “And there will circulate among them young boys of perpetual freshness. If you saw them, you would think them [as beautiful as] scattere

🔥31🤮1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ExposingMomo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 962,282 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Religion of no peace” (@ExposingMomo), 504 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExposingMomo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.