Boycott Driscoll’s strawberries. @ExposingGoySlop
👍3👎2

Channel
@ExposingGoySlop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003831468975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ExposingGoySlop |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 10 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ExposingGoySlop |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 53 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 50 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 47 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 47 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8 | 50.0% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ExposingGoySlop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2026 to 27 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Boycott Driscoll’s strawberries. @ExposingGoySlop
👍3👎2
Driscoll’s control a 3rd of every strawberry sold in the US. ⚠️ •The “forever chemicals” on Driscoll’s strawberries sold in stores in California are listed in the image. •Forever chemicals” refers to a group of widely used, long-lasting per- and polyfluoroalkyl compounds linked to harmful health effects in humans, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website. •cancer risks •reproductive diseases •…
👍1
Those berries get bleached in chlorine and sealed inside plastic so thoroughly that no amount of rinsing can remove the residue. https://mamavation.com/food/pfas-pesticides-driscolls-strawberries.html
America’s most popular strawberries have finally been exposed. ⚠️ ⚠️Before those berries reach the shelf, they are sprayed with up to 371 chemical pesticides. And most people are buying them without knowing. @ExposingGoySlop
👍2
https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local/health-department-criticizes-starbucks-unicorn-frappuccino/11883/?amp=1
The most shocking aspect of this drink actually isn’t the ingredient list – it’s the sugar. MORE sugar than: •Entire bag of Hostess Powdered Donuts •Four large scoops of Baskin Robbins Chocolate Chip Ice Cream •29 Hershey’s Kisses It contains more sugar than the average American consumes in one day‼️ @ExposingGoySlop
The truth about Starbuck’s Unicorn Frappuccino. 🦄🙅♂️ ⚠️The worst ingredients are in red. Here are a few explanations of some ingredients listed: Carrageenan – Linked to intestinal inflammation and cancer. Citric Acid – Typically derived from mold made with GMO corn (not from fruit). This appears 8 times in the ingredient list! Mono and Diglycerides – A hidden form of trans fat, which is strongly linked to heart…
👍1
No wonder why it’s usually the only water left at stores sometimes. 🤢 @ExposingGoySlop
👍1
Dasani is often the water they use in fast food restaurants. It makes them money and the restaurants too. @ExposingGoySlop
https://www.oasishealth.app/search/item/402485
Dasani is considered the WORST water bottle on the entire planet‼️ The 3 ingredients: 1. Salt - makes you more thirsty. 2. Magnesium Sulfate - dries your mouth out. 3. Potassium Chloride - consuming too much can give you heart problems or cardiac arrest. Water should just be water, you don’t need those chemicals in it. @ExposingGoySlop
The sodium alone is enough to spike blood pressure in one sitting. Takis should be banned. @ExposingGoySlop
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ExposingGoySlop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GoySlop Exposed” (@ExposingGoySlop), 53 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ExposingGoySlop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.