Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EventHorizonIQ

Channel

EventHorizonIQ

@EventHorizonIQ

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

479subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003712871609
TypeChannel
Username@EventHorizonIQ
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded31 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/EventHorizonIQ

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

479492485.531 August 2026 — 491 subscribers31 August 2026 — 492 subscribers10 September 2026 — 489 subscribers25 September 2026 — 482 subscribers6 October 2026 — 479 subscribers31 August 20266 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 36 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 477–494 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 10:15479-3
25 Sept 2026, 11:56482-7
10 Sept 2026, 07:18489-3
31 Aug 2026, 22:37492+1
31 Aug 2026, 03:33491first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC14 viewsread 31 August 2026

Today on EHIQ Premium — August 30 🟠 Sensor stack leaning cautious today. BTC at $78,789. Premium subscribers got full sensor breakdown + morning brief. View structural risk

29 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC36 viewsread 31 August 2026

Today on EHIQ Premium — August 29 🔴 Our sensor stack reads defensive today. BTC at $78,162. Premium subscribers got full sensor breakdown + morning brief. View structural risk

27 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC50 viewsread 31 August 2026

Today on EHIQ Premium — August 27 🔴 Our sensor stack reads defensive today. BTC at $80,184. Premium subscribers got full sensor breakdown + morning brief. View structural risk

25 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC79 viewsread 31 August 2026

Today on EHIQ Premium — August 25 🔴 Our sensor stack reads defensive today. BTC at $78,660. Premium subscribers got full sensor breakdown + morning brief. View structural risk

24 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 31 August 2026

PRE-EARNINGS TIQ ALERT TonalityIQ flagged 1 of 54 scanned tickers with language shifts in the top decile of our transcript corpus. ROOT — language anomaly detected Premium subscribers see which tickers flagged and why. eventhorizoniq.com/pricing

❤1

24 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC85 viewsread 31 August 2026

WEEKLY RECAP Scoreboard: 21 confirmed, 16 wrong, 293 active (330 tracked) Confirmed this week: LCID BEARISH (called Jul 31) +25.3% in the called direction OWL BEARISH (called Feb 26) -4.0% in the called direction TSLA BEARISH (called Feb 26) +11.2% in the called direction IREN BULLISH (called Mar 21) +1.4% in the called direction RGTI BULLISH (called Mar 21) +20.4% in the called direction Wrong this week…

23 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC59 viewsread 31 August 2026

Today on EHIQ Premium — August 23 🔴 Our sensor stack reads defensive today. BTC at $77,681. Premium subscribers got full sensor breakdown + morning brief. View structural risk

23 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC67 viewsread 31 August 2026

THE SIGNAL: GOOGL Q4_FY2025 Earnings Scorecard Ratio: 2.39 (prior: 1.91, delta: 0.48) Classification: CONVICTION_SURGING Constraint: 3.77 | Conviction: 9.0 AI Language: 9.56 | Growth: 10.11 Hedge: 3.0 | Blame: 0.33 KEY SHIFTS: - Conviction UP 1.22 pts - AI language DOWN 3.78 pts ARC: CRACK (similarity: 0.88) First guidance cut, first excuse framework. Actionable leading indicator of further decline. Crack p…

22 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC60 viewsread 31 August 2026

THE SIGNAL: 3 earnings calls scored this run - the ones that matter are flagged for Premium. Full public breakdown: eventhorizoniq.com/tiq

21 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC65 viewsread 31 August 2026

Today on EHIQ Premium — August 21 🔴 Our sensor stack reads defensive today. BTC at $78,313. Premium subscribers got full sensor breakdown + morning brief. View structural risk

21 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC67 viewsread 31 August 2026

⚠️ Sensor Convergence Detected 3 sensors across 3 signal families signaling elevated risk simultaneously: ALERT Geopolitical Risk: ELEVATED ALERT Polymarket IQ: ELEVATED CRITICAL BTC Regime Detector: SEVERE Signal: Broad sensor elevation detected. Monitoring for further escalation or resolution. Context: Polymarket: 8% recession risk | Yield curve: 15bp View all sensors

21 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC65 viewsread 31 August 2026

🟢 BTC ROSE 3.1% IN THE LAST 4 HOURS BTC just surged 3.1% to $77,118. Stress Index: 22/100 (Low) 13 sensors firing 🔒 Premium subscribers got this alert 15 minutes ago with full sensor breakdown and forward context. Upgrade: eventhorizoniq.com/structural-risk

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EventHorizonIQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EventHorizonIQ” (@EventHorizonIQ), 479 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EventHorizonIQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.