Hi, saw the EDP documentary got taken down. Just know, mike posted it on twitter. https://x.com/mikeclum/status/2086613355091878266

Channel
E.N.S.O
@EuroNATSOCorder
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
158subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003864648841 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EuroNATSOCorder |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EuroNATSOCorder |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 158 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 158 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 63.5%
- avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 100
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.89%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,007 |
| Reactions total | 92 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20m 06s
- Average length
- 6m 42s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 50 | 54.3% | |
| 🫡 | 33 | 35.9% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 9.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 261
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 45%
- Most on one post
- 251
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EuroNATSOCorder. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🇲🇽 El Adam and El Alex have joined the ONSP in Aryon de Beanero in mexico. Now, they are…MAFIOSO They have became true Aztecs!!
👏4
James Mason reads and comments on an article about the White Australia Party’s legal arguments in the High Court of Australia. You don’t even need ElevenLabs to have AI James Mason read out articles; the real James Mason does it for free.
⚡1
I did not realize my experience with a predatory label was so common. Back in 2024 I had this black metal project, it was called Vadok. This project got reached out by a label called WormHoleDeath. This label is extremely predatory and corporate also Jewish as fuck (allegedly, fuck you carlo and your lawyers.) I was just oh so happy when I saw the email. Wow! someone likes my music! no way! Well, the guy was just t…
⚡4
Hello! I have made a personal twitter account (I'm not calling it X) feel free to drop me a follow or talk to me. https://x.com/OberSturmWaffen Channel⚡️ Back-up Contact: EuropeanNationalSocialistOrder@proton.me
On a similar topic. Some movement advice. The loudest barrels are the emptiest. If someone is chest beating how badass they are as a person constantly to you. They're the first to bitch out. Actual solid people don't feel the need to constantly let everyone know how badass they are. Every single person we've ever met in the movement who chest beats is the first to dip out on you over minor things like door knocks or…
⚡5
Lead of ENSO here to announce im writing another book
⚡4🫡1
M8L8TH - Beyond the Twilights - YULENIGHT II LIVE (25.12.2025) "По ту сторону сумерек" - песня из далёкого 2004 года - снова ожила на сцене фестиваля #yulenight2 в сыром и выжигающем звучании Молотх, в подземном пространстве славного и воинственного Киева. Ночь, я с тобой... P.S. С того же фестиваля доступно видео с треком "Ведьминский Туман" - https://t.me/militantzone/3636
⚡3
IF YOU LIVE IN THE UK AND ARE A NATIONAL SOCIALIST, A NATIONALIST, FAR RIGHT, WHITE NATIONALIST OR ANYTHING SIMILAR READ THIS In the United Kingdom, terrorism laws are very prolific. Like other regimes these laws are used less to stop actual terrorism but to silence all opposition. Now; I will try my best to explain these laws to the absolute fullest extent I possibly can remember that there may be a thing or two th…
🫡11
Statement from United Youth: 🏹 Unfortunately, our National Telegram channel was recently censored due to attacks from bad actors. Despite this setback, no major infrastructure has been damaged and we will be carrying on per usual just with a brother channel for those on censored platforms such as iPhone. 🏹 Members stand more united than ever and morale is high. Please assist us in this struggle by sharing this chan…
🫡4
R.I.P Ken Colonel Slanders! Thank you for your music!
⚡8
WAFFENFORUM New site for National Socialists. Talk, argue, and keep the idea alive. Open to all National Socialists. End-to-end encrypted, encrypted database, privately owned VPS. Built to stay online and protect users. Feds get banned on report. LARPs get removed. No time wasted. Features: - Clean UI - Communities - Threads and subthreads - DMs - Levels - Reputation - Posting Join here: https://waffenforum.org/ Cha…
⚡7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EuroNATSOCorder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 350,221 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@AMIV8814 · 404 postsHersantite
@hersantite · 3,9891 postKaltBlod
@KaltBlod_nsbm · 101 postGlory Days of R.A.C🇬🇷🎸
@nosurrender28 · 9851 postThule Signal / Алексей Лёвкин / Молоток из РДК
@thulesignal · 29,3321 postUnited Youth
@UnitedYouthUpdates · 4321 post𝖂𝖔𝖑𝖋𝖘𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖓𝖟𝖊 𝖀𝖓𝖉𝖊𝖗𝖌𝖗𝖔𝖚𝖓𝖉
@WolfsschanzeUnderground · 6861 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@EuroNATSOCorder named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“E.N.S.O” (@EuroNATSOCorder), 158 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EuroNATSOCorder.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.