Channel
@EternalSugarCookies_LastTime
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003749034553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EternalSugarCookies_LastTime |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 16 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EternalSugarCookies_LastTime |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 32 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 32 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 February 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 108 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
55 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 27.3% | |
| custom 5244885534978897584 | 14 | 25.5% | |
| custom 5246869058250371993 | 14 | 25.5% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.27% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. — 🔤м, ну мило, но это больше понравилось бы любителю знаний. — Вечный сахар уже готова была провалиться в прекрасный сон. — 🔤ни заняты в своих владениях и своими подчинёнными. Они мне тут лишь хаос устроят. Не странно, ты просто их не видела. 💭 🔤ахар успела уже задремать, пока маленькая Лили рассматривала прекрасные виды сада. Она думала, как же все-таки хорошо она устроила всё…
❤1
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. 🤩🤩 🔤 только хотела уже прикрыть глаза и насладиться пением птиц, но от потока вопросов вздрогнула. Как-то... Слишком много. Немножко начинает раздражать. 🤩🤩 — 🔤е знаю я, что случилось с этими ведьмами, — успела уже разлечься вдоль бортика фонтана, — потому что они не поняли и запечатали меня. Не уверена насчёт этого, сахарок. 🤩📶 🔤одумав, что та замолчала, я прикрыла глаза и х…
❤1
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. — 🔤ахарок, не стоит думать о таком. Ведьмы были глупы. Они не поняли моей любви к вам. Давай не будем о грустном. 🤩 🔤аконец-то они пересекли границы сада. Взгляду юной студентки открылись великолепные пейзажи: архитектурные храмы, прекрасные кустовые цветы, а где-то вдали — горный сахарный хребет. По пути виднелись и другие обитатели сада, которые наслаждались времяпровождением…
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. — 🔤нтересные книжки у тебя, сахарок. —Никак прокомментировав бурканье, она продолжила.— Да, да, та самая. Теперь я прилетела осчастливить тебя. 🐈⬛ 🔤 стояла, просто ожидая, когда наконец-то согласятся на моё предложение. Естественно, упуская возможность отказа. Наконец-то дождавшись, улыбнулась. 💕 — 🔤остараемся успеть! — расправив свои крылья, не взирая на возможности того, …
❤1
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. 🔤у, а какой ещё реакции можно ожидать, когда вламываешься в чей-то дом? Я лишь мягко улыбнулась. 🤩🤩 — 🔤, дорогая, Вечный сахар. Камешек этот — моё сокровище, а что, красивый? 🔤ягко произнесла я, смотря на Белую Лилию. 🤩🤩 — 🔤ы будем наслаждаться, любоваться видами моего сада и, конечно, вечно радоваться. Да, это тоже можно будет устроить. Ну что? Согласна провести со мной св…
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. 🔤м. Я услышала о тоске из своего сада и решила прогуляться за его пределы. Летая над хлебоземьем, я увидела в окне одного из домиков очень скучающего ребёнка. Думаю, ей лучше будет отправиться в мой прекрасный сад, чем сидеть тут. Я залетела в дом и осмотрелась. Подойдя к студентке, улыбнулась. 🤩 — 🔤дравствуй, извини, если напугала, сахарок. Не хочешь ли вместе со мной отправ…
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. ☺️х, прекрасный вечер после прошедшего дня. Как он прошёл для вас, мои сахарные обитатели сада? 🤩 ☺️адеюсь, вам было весело и хорошо, как всегда, и вы не чувствовали усталости или грусти. Но если вдруг такое было, не стесняйтесь и обращайтесь ко мне за помощью! Я обязательно подбодрю вас, мои Сахарки, и заставлю позабыть о всей печали в душе! 🤩 ☺️ой день в прекрасном саду п…
✨🎀➖➿➿🌟➿➿➖🎀✨ ✨➿➿➿ ✨ ➿➿➿➿✨ [😁] — «У-ху-ху..- Кажется, одна из наших звёзд вновь готова засиять для своих зрителей!~» ➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿ ❕➖стречайте: —Печенье Вечный Сахар🍪 ➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿ —Отметим же её возвращение почтением и аплодисментами...~ ➿➿➖➖➖➖➖➖🫢 🍔. 🔼. #UNREST
Админ: переформа, щас с реста скоро выходить буду
ㅤㅤㅤ‧⁺˚*･༓☾🔤elcomeㅤㅤㅤㅤ🤩 ㅤ⚾️ㅤㅤㅤ to ㅤㅤㅤthe Garden of Eden☽༓･*˚⁺‧ ㅤㅤ🤩ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ❤ 💘Ваше вечное счастье и веселье ждёт вас именно здесь! 🔤ой сад – замечательное место для всех любителей хлебобулочных изделий! Здесь вы не почувствуете ни боли, ни страдания. Также готова выслушать интересующие вас вопросы и с радостью ответить на них! 🔤о и для этого есть условия. Вы обязательно должны соблюдать правила моего
[ 😻 ]➿➿➿✨➖➖➖➖✨➿ ➖ху... ! Объявляется антракт⚪️ —Печенье Вечный Сахар🍪уходит со сцены на неопределённый срок. ➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩➿🤩 —🌟ожелаем же ей хорошего отдыха!🥀 ➿➿➖➖➖➖➖➖🫢 🍔. 🔼. #REST
⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫. —🔤нтересное у вас занятие, ходить по снам и собирать травы. Не стоит обесценивать себя, вы тоже можете быть весьма привлекательным зрелищем. 🤩 🔤 на минуту задумалась и вспомнила, что стоит все же не мешать спутнице своим присутствием, и решила улететь. 🤩 —🔤о скорой встречи, очаровательная фея. ⸼࣪ ֢ 🤩ㅤ ִ𔘓ᤳ 🤩 ๋ 𝆹𝅥𝆹𝅥 ᯏֵ۫ 🎁 ࿚᷼ ۫.
❤2👍1💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EternalSugarCookies_LastTime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,388 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♡︎╳︎¦︎𝕰𝖙𝖊𝖗𝖓𝖆𝖑 𝖘𝖚𝖌𝖆𝖗¦︎╳︎♡︎” (@EternalSugarCookies_LastTime), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EternalSugarCookies_LastTime.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.