Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 59 days, net -162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,812–27,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 12:41
26,836
-29
26 Sept 2026, 04:01
26,865
-21
19 Sept 2026, 09:56
26,886
+46
16 Sept 2026, 21:01
26,840
-13
14 Sept 2026, 22:39
26,853
-11
13 Sept 2026, 09:19
26,864
-6
11 Sept 2026, 15:57
26,870
-4
9 Sept 2026, 03:01
26,874
-10
5 Sept 2026, 22:18
26,884
-12
3 Sept 2026, 19:20
26,896
+54
2 Sept 2026, 09:13
26,842
-17
1 Sept 2026, 06:26
26,859
-18
31 Aug 2026, 07:14
26,877
-5
30 Aug 2026, 06:24
26,882
+5
29 Aug 2026, 09:45
26,877
+5
28 Aug 2026, 07:57
26,872
-8
27 Aug 2026, 09:37
26,880
-7
26 Aug 2026, 06:11
26,887
+1
25 Aug 2026, 05:15
26,886
+1
24 Aug 2026, 05:46
26,885
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 26,836 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,100
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.583%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 October 2026
Posts held
68 (6 July 2026 – 5 October 2026)
Views total
170,810
Reactions total
995
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,900
Videos
≈122
Links
≈573
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,397 reactions across 68 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
1,260
52.6%
👍
537
22.4%
❤
314
13.1%
😡
102
4.26%
😁
55
2.29%
👏
36
1.50%
🤯
23
0.96%
🤔
18
0.751%
🔥
16
0.668%
🎉
11
0.459%
😱
11
0.459%
😢
10
0.417%
🥰
3
0.125%
🤩
1
0.042%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,397 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Informamos que en este momento se encuentran interrumpidos diferentes sistemas y equipos tecnológicos por problemas energéticos, lo cual provoca afectaciones en la navegación a través del servicio nauta, los pagos electrónicos por Transfermóvil así como la gestión de los servicios asociados.
Igualmente, pueden percibirse afectaciones de servicios que ofrecen otras instituciones.
Se mantiene la navegación por datos mó…
En medio de las dificultades que enfrentamos, nuestros técnicos y especialistas no se detienen. Ellos mantienen su compromiso con las telecomunicaciones 📡 en el país.
#EtecsaConCuba 🇨🇺
👵👴 Hoy es el #DíaInternacionalDeLasPersonasDeEdad 🥳.
💻📲 Enseñarles, orientarlas y facilitar su acceso a las herramientas digitales contribuye a hacerles la vida más sencilla y a mantenerlas conectadas con su familia, su comunidad y el mundo 🌎.
👉 Como parte de la vinculación de nuestra empresa con la enseñanza media, hoy iniciaron sus prácticas laborales los estudiantes de 4.º año de Técnico Medio en Telecomunicaciones del IPI Mayor General Calixto García 📡🎓 en la provincia de Holguín.
Una experiencia que contribuye a su formación profesional y al acercamiento al quehacer cotidiano del sector de las telecomunicaciones.
#ETECSAConCuba 🇨🇺
📣 Por estos días se desarrolla en La Habana el curso de formación de Ejecutivas de Punto de Venta. 📱🖥️📠
📝📕🖊️ Una capacitación que brinda las herramientas necesarias para fortalecer su desempeño y brindar un mejor servicio en nuestras oficinas.
#EtecsaConCuba
La instalación de paneles fotovoltaicos ⚡ permite aprovechar la energía solar para apoyar el respaldo energético de los sistemas de telecomunicaciones 🛜📶 en centros principales de cabeceras municipales del país.
#EtecsaConCuba 🇨🇺
📌 Proteger la red de telecomunicaciones es responsabilidad de todos‼️
Los hechos vandálicos, la quema de basura y maleza cerca de cables, postes y gabinetes telefónicos, provocan interrupciones a comunidades e instituciones.
👉Cuidemos nuestra infraestructura 🤝.
#EtecsaConCuba
Nuestra empresa, con el apoyo incondicional de sus trabajadores, continúa ejecutando inversiones y labores complejas para fortalecer los servicios de telecomunicaciones.
Este es un proceso gradual que requiere tiempo y esfuerzo sostenido.
📹 Más detalles aquí: https://youtu.be/Fp86qKIasnQ
La situación actual de los servicios de telecomunicaciones 📲☎️🛜 que brindamos, condicionada en gran medida por las circunstancias energéticas ⚡ que hoy vive el país, entre otros factores, nos ha hecho reorganizar prioridades en el uso de recursos y ejecución de inversiones 📶.
En ese sentido, se implementa un proceso de cambio gradual de la matriz energética 💡 para aumentar la disponibilidad de sitios tecnológicos qu…
📢🔐 Protege tus dispositivos y tu información.
🛡️ Usa antivirus y mantenlo actualizado. 🔄 Actualiza tus sistemas y aplicaciones. 👀 ¡Ojo con lo que descargas!
💻📲 ¡Navega seguro!
#Ciberconsejos
🌀 La #TemporadaCiclónica está activa.
🌧️ Las fuertes lluvias y tormentas eléctricas ⚡ pueden afectar tus equipos de telecomunicaciones 📞📡.
👉 ¡Protégelos! Desconéctalos y evita daños. 😉
💙 Compromiso humano en acción.
📍 En Villa Clara, trabajadores de nuestra empresa garantizan el traslado de pacientes de hemodiálisis en medio de la crisis energética.
📌 Lee la noticia completa en 👉 www.etecsa.cu/es/noticias/apoya-etecsa-en-villa-clara-traslado-pacientes-hemodialisis
👎16❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @EtecsaCubaOficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Transfermóvil @TransfermovilCuba · 42,109 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 August 2026
EnZona ★ @EnZonaBX · 43,821 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 August 2026
Última Hora Cuba 🇨🇺 @ultimahoracubanews · 24,165 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
Directorio Cubano @directoriocubano · 33,340 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
Cubadebate @cubadebate · 73,036 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
elTOQUE @eltoquecom · 29,479 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
CiberCuba @cibercuba · 52,019 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
Viajando ANUNCIA @apkviajandoinfo · 104,932 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
El Tiempo en Cuba 🇨🇺🌤 @tiempocuba · 37,891 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
ticket 🇨🇺 @xetid_ticket · 47,198 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 August 2026
Empresa Eléctrica Ciego de Ávila @eecav · 69,960 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 20 August 2026
Cuba a Pulso @CubaPulso · 21,723 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 September 2026
Software y Programación @softwareyprogramacion · 21,624 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 23 September 2026
QvaPay @qvapay · 32,061 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 8 September 2026
La Bolita Cubana @bolitacubanaofficial · 41,888 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
Comunicación GASLOR @CupetStgo · 22,422 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 September 2026
Ministerio de Salud Pública de Cuba @MINSAPCuba · 36,518 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ETECSA_Cuba” (@EtecsaCubaOficial), 26,836 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EtecsaCubaOficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.