Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ежатина♡

@Eshatinaaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

790subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001952193569
TypeChannel
Username@Eshatinaaaa
Description16 y. о Лс : @Ezhatinaa Артканал, но раз в столетие здесь появляются фоточки в косплеях Твиттер: https://x.com/eshatinafan
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Eshatinaaaa

Growth

7907 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 790 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 790 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:318 Aug 2026, 01:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 789–791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:46790no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:31790first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
229.6%
avg views ÷ 790 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (10 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total9,069
Reactions total483
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
793
Videos
119
Links
62

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,758 reactions across 18 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75743.1%
❤‍🔥42824.3%
🥰20911.9%
🔥1609.10%
💘975.52%
custom 5309922953431885353201.14%
😭191.08%
custom 5404821948054133668100.569%
🤩90.512%
🍓80.455%
custom 537072961435000841770.398%
👍70.398%
custom 532588897036876208260.341%
👏50.284%
custom 524499593281826658930.171%
🌭30.171%
🐳30.171%
👎20.114%
😱20.114%
custom 530983737191354416410.057%
2 further kinds20.114%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,758reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,379
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 18 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
556
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Eshatinaaaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC≈2,890 views99 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коммишечка по резерке с медиум для @AoiHana_15 🥰🥰 #rezero

72❤‍🔥12🔥9👍2👏1💘1💯1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC447 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Рисую коммишечку.. Я щас психану, серьёзно. Я вчера блть тонны часов потратила на ее рисование ,почти дорисовала, там оставалась 1/3 покраса + фон простенький доделать..... Решила лечь спать,пк не вырубила т.к лень было, арт в Крите конечно же вне формата пнг я не сохраняла... Просыпаюсь... Пк вырублен.👏👏👏 (Мама спасибо большое) Короче недоделанный арт сохранился из-за этого чисто в формате пнг(это обычная картинк

46😭10❤‍🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC562 views75 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Решила, что иногда буду постить и коммишки тоже, чтоб тгк не пустовал🥳 Заказик для @nott_6

❤‍🔥4814🔥6👏3💘2🌭1🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTCviews —48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥337🍓5👎2💘1

29 Jul 2026, 04:20 UTC≈1,110 views89 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллабный артик с замечательной @kankeir !!! Подписочку на неё пжлст, она крута.🥳 (Моя часть с Ахерон, нижняя.)

❤‍🔥5124🔥8💘3🌭1🍓1🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 02:32 UTC≈4,060 views110 reactions24 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коммишка по резерке для @EndiBendi 🥳🥳 #rezero

74❤‍🔥15🔥11🥰3custom 53258889703687620823🍓2🌭1custom 53098373719135441641

14 Jul 2026, 23:53 UTC≈4,660 views264 reactions107 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Эмисубы ирл. Я потратила на эту херню полно времени,поэтому можно активчик, пжлстт( #rezero

184❤‍🔥31🥰18custom 530992295343188535310custom 54048219480541336688custom 53707296143500084177🔥4💘1

12 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC≈1,650 views63 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спойлер к будущему артику... Сори что артов маловато, у меня анвайб и ничего кроме гниения в кроватке и ролок в нейронке не хочется😫 Я заебалась делать этот фон, он даже на половину не закончен..... 😱😱

44🔥11🥰5❤‍🔥3

4 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈1,650 views101 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

несколько фоточек в косплейчике. Я сходила на фест, не помню писала здесь или нет, но из-за того, что хорошо закончила год мне все такт разрешили пойти в косплее на фест, прикол да. Мне очень НЕ понравилось, т.к пока ехала на фест попала в небольшую аварию, таксист ебанутый . меня об кресло спереди херачнуло, потом еще часа 4 нос болел + из-за этого столкновения часть парика отлетела от моего косплея к херам. Я ве

❤‍🔥6019😭9🥰6💘2🔥2😱2custom 54048219480541336681

3 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC≈4,920 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Винсчиши/чишави #rezero Мне очень и ооочень стыдно, что я рисую подобное... т к скорее всего половине из вас такое вообще не нравится, а остальная половина даже не знает кто это.. Я в скором времени сяду за что-то адекватное, просто ну очень хотелось накалякать их.прошу понять и простить😫

❤‍🔥4514🥰5💘3🔥2😁1custom 54048219480541336681

2 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,330 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

рисую винсчиш

42❤‍🔥11🔥5👍4💘2🥰2

20 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC≈5,270 views115 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Косплейчик Эмилии горничной. Тут 100% сидят люди, которые еще застали мой косплей на рем(нет ,я не фанат рем, просто парный косплей с сестрой был, она рам.) ,и скорее всего знали ситуацию с ним(в кратце, его мама "выбросила". Таки вот, узнаю оказывается, что не выбрасывала, а просто спрятала к себе в шкаф и он так больше года лежал.... Ахаха. В связи с тем, что все остальные косплеи она сказала либо продавать, либо

❤‍🔥7323🥰10custom 53099229534318853536🔥2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Eshatinaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 838,397 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AI и точка.
@ai4telegram · 858,451
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ежатина♡” (@Eshatinaaaa), 790 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eshatinaaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.