Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Equal Memes

@EqualMemes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

161subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724379819
TypeChannel
Username@EqualMemes
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/EqualMemes

Growth

1616 August 2026 — 161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 161 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 160–162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:01161no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:33161first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
9
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 17s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣3736.6%
👎1110.9%
🥴1110.9%
🤡98.91%
👍76.93%
65.94%
😁65.94%
🥰65.94%
👏32.97%
🔥21.98%
🌭10.99%
🍌10.99%
🤨10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2023 to 11 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2024, 11:10 UTC≈2,680 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Honor taunts Samsung after Galaxy Z Fold 6 launch. @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

👏3

10 Jun 2024, 19:31 UTC≈2,330 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Battle Started Samsung troll Apple for Apple Intelligence but Samsung forget that their Galaxy AI is cloud based AI instead of on device AI @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

🤡4

3 Jun 2024, 05:23 UTC≈3,390 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This is the biggest deal possible in any e-commerce right now, grab it before it's over. @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

🥴7

2 Jun 2024, 09:16 UTC≈3,550 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Finally Techno trolled other brands to give 2MP rear camera which actually doesn't mean anything it's just a gimmick. However, the company itself overlooks the fact that its own phone still has a 2MP+2MP camera configuration. Fun Fact : The brand trolled only Samsung and OnePlus for having only 2MP rear camera but they aren't trolling the OG brands like Redmi, Realme and Vivo, the original brands that introduced a p

🤡5👍1🔥1

2 Jun 2024, 05:24 UTC≈2,900 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This advertisement itself tells a lot. If you know you know @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

1😁1

2 Jun 2024, 05:19 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

If you don't have this kind of confidence then you can only have Apple in your life, not Tecno. @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

1 Jun 2024, 09:50 UTC≈4,000 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This crap brand "Poco" is shamelessly comparing its crap phones with Samsung Galaxy S24+ and Galaxy S23 FE. If there was ever a face of shame it would look like the Poco brand. Let's be honest here, Poco F6 is an average budget phone with no guarantee that its motherboard will break down after a year. But comparing it to the Galaxy S24+ is like putting a tricycle next to a Formula One car. @EqualLeaks | @LaptopIns

👎7🥴21🌭1🍌1👍1🔥1🤨1

15 May 2024, 13:04 UTC≈4,040 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Google I/O event ❎ AIAIAIAIAIAIAIAI ✅ Video credit @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

🥰5👍1😁1

19 Apr 2024, 12:05 UTC≈3,390 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Equal Memes 🗿 Realme & Nothing 🤡 @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @Equalmemes

🤣13👎2👍1

19 Apr 2024, 11:10 UTC≈4,570 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Find difference...... Between these two @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

🤣10👎2

8 Apr 2024, 06:14 UTC≈3,520 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Redmi - We're launching Redmi Turbo 3 in China. Realme - We're launching Realme P "Power" in India. Infinix or Techno be like - We're launching Infinix/Techno Turbo Power 3 globally 🗿 @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

4

2 Apr 2024, 07:41 UTC≈3,790 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The President of OnePlus China has shared a post where he wrote "If the product is not strong enough, there is no point in changing the name". Indirectly this is targeting Redmi for their upcoming "Turbo" series. @EqualFacts | @EqualDeal | @EqualMovies | @EqualMemes

🤣6👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @EqualMemes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 587,560 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Equal Memes” (@EqualMemes), 161 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EqualMemes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.