Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Epoch Of Passélle. #CariMademoiselle

@Eposelle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471565423
TypeChannel
Username@Eposelle
DescriptionHustle and bustle o' the burghal permeated by geriatric propietars that blemish th' heritor of alluring brown optics. The disclosure of the ample prodigious edifice among all the existing edifices, Epoch Of Passélle. @EposelleBot! ♥️
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Eposelle

Growth

358 August 2026 — 35 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:4735no change
8 Aug 2026, 14:4535first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
5
Links
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2022 to 7 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Nov 2022, 12:12 UTC≈3,360 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

❅.. Restraint for epoch—fabricated forlorn utopia, hitherto the crevasse permeated be arduous. Ameliorating, covetous entire hawkish veiled o' mademoiselle reveries, en route luminously afire berth. Petite midriff ensphere by an incredible buckle. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐮𝐧-𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐝𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐞𝐝'𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐚𝐠𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐝𝐲𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐜. 𝐀 𝐝𝐚𝐳𝐳𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐢𝐭'𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐚 𝐬𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐨' 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐭𝐲. Innuendo of the federat

7 Nov 2022, 09:31 UTC524 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @GoldKidzPhoto

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤ :¨ ·.· ¨: ⠀ ⠀ 𝐑𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐥𝐥 ⠀⠀ 𝐞𝐱𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐬𝐭 ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ㅤ ㅤ𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐠𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝐬𝐲𝐦𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐲 🎼 . .⃗ . 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗒 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖻𝗒 𝗅𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗁𝗌 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗐𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗀𝗅𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗉 𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗒𝗆𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖽, 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗉𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖻𝗅𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾. 𖥔⠈˖ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

5 Nov 2022, 06:53 UTC341 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @QuilliancePhoto

ㅤ ㅤㅤ𝑯𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒈𝒉𝒕𝒔 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒘𝒂𝒚𝒔 𝒓𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒃𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒅-𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒓𝒉𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒎𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒍𝒚𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕, 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒅, 𝒘𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒌 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒈𝒍𝒐𝒃𝒆. 𝑩𝒚 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒕𝒚𝒑𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒉𝒐𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒑𝒓𝒂𝒚𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒘𝒆𝒓𝒆 𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒃𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒔𝒂𝒊𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒐 𝒇𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒅 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒋𝒐𝒌𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒋𝒐𝒚. 𝑩𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒌-𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒑𝒉𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒈𝒊𝒓𝒍 𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒄𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒏 𝒊𝒏 𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒅. 𝑺𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒓𝒐𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒂𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒕𝒐𝒅𝒂𝒚 𝒃𝒆𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂 𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒐. 𝑶𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒎𝒐𝒓𝒆, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒍𝒅 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒅

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Eposelle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,063,804 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Epoch Of Passélle. #CariMademoiselle” (@Eposelle), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eposelle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.