Channel
@Englishwith_hadis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
220subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002043960095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Englishwith_hadis |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Englishwith_hadis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 220 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 223 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 222 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 222 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (17 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 344 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
92 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 29.3% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 15.2% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 12.0% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 5.43% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 😎 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 2.17% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💬کدوم گزینه از نظر گرامری درسته🤔⁉️ 🔺 میدونی بانک کجاست؟!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2😎2
Signed hadis
کسی تمرین این پست رو نفرستاد😒 خودم میگم😊 ↙️↙️ ✅ I had my hair dyed موهامو رنگ کردم (آرایشگر رنگش کرد) @Englishwith_hadis
❤1👏1😢1
Signed hadis
Hello, everyone 🙋🏻♀🧡😍 How's it going? If we don't change, we don't grow. If we don't grow, we aren't really living.🦋✌️🏻 ✍🏻 Gail Sheehy اگر تغییر نکنیم، رشد نمیکنیم و اگر رشد نکنیم، واقعاً زندگی نمیکنیم. 🌼@Englishwith_hadis
❤2👏1
Signed hadis
When you wash a spoon in the sink🥄🤣 @Englishwith_hadis
🤣10
Signed hadis
حالا نوبت شماست!😍 جملههاتون رو بنویسید و بفرستید تا با هم بررسیشون کنیم.
❤6
Signed hadis
📌causative: ساختار سببی ✅ در انگلیسی برای زمانی که کاری رو به شخص دیگهای میسپاریم تا برامون انجام بده، میتونیم از ساختار Causative استفاده کنیم و گرامر causative با افعال have و get هستش. - در فارسی، معادل اینه که بگیم ⬇️ 💇🏻♀ موهامو کوتاه کردم (یعنی موهامو آرایشگر کوتاه کرد، نه خودم) 🔹ساختار جملات سببی ↙️ 🔸have / get + something + Past participle (شکل سوم فعل) ▫️I had my car washed yesterday. ماشینم رو دیر…
❤2👏2✍1😍1
Signed hadis
پس نگید didn't, don't آفرین🙂🪓 بگید not to + verb😊
💯2🫡2😁1😎1
Signed hadis
✅ جواب درست ↙️↙️ 2⃣ I told you not to go. یکی از اشتباههای رایج اینه که بگیم ↓ ❌ I told you don't go. ❌ I told you didn't go. 📌اما وقتی میخوایم بگیم «بهت که گفتم نری، بهت گفتم انجام ندی، بهش گفتم اون حرفو نزنه و...» از این ساختار استفاده میکنیم ↙️↙️ 🟢 tell + someone + (not) to + verb 🔹I told you not to go. بهت گفتم نری. - چند تا مثال دیگه ببینید ⬇️ 🔸He told us not to worry. اون به ما گفت نگران نباشیم. 🔹 I …
❤3✍1👍1
Signed hadis
📌کدوم گزینه ترجمه درست «بهت گفتم که نری» ⁉️
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1🤔1😍1😎1
Signed hadis
خطاب به تو اگه امسال کنکور داری: «نمیدونم امسال چه آدمهایی سر راهت قرار گرفتن، نمیدونم چهقدر تشویق یا ناامید از مسیرت شدی، میدونم چهقدر بیخوابی و استرس کشیدی، میدونم چهقدر اذیت شدی، من ازت جای تموم کسایی که تو رو نادیده گرفتن تشکر میکنم، نتیجهی کنکور هرچی شد به خودت افتخار کن؛ تو قهرمان راه خودتی.»
❤🔥4
Signed hadis
💡یه نکته از داخل مکالمه بگم👇🏻 📌بعضی وقت ها توی انگلیسی، جملهی که میشنوی اصلا معنی تحتاللفظی خودش رو نمیده. 🔹مثلا Tell me about it! توی بعضی موقعیتها به معنی «دربارهاش بهم بگو» نیست. ✅ در واقع یک اصطلاح محاورهایه برای وقتی که کاملا با حرف طرف مقابل موافقی و خودت هم دقیقا همون حس یا تجربه رو داری. پس اگه کسی گفت: 🫠I’m so tired! میتونی بگی ↓ 😢Tell me about it! نگو! منم همینطور! - Tell me about it! ↘️↘️ ▪️ن…
👏2✍1🤩1
Signed hadis
👩🏻💼 Seriously? People drive crazy during rush hour. جدی؟! مردم توی ساعات شلوغی خیلی بد رانندگی میکنن. 🙎🏻♀ Tell me about it! Anyway, I'll be there as soon as I can. نگو! خلاصه، هرچی بتونم زودتر خودمو میرسونم. 👩🏻💼 No worries. Just drive carefully. I'll wait for you. اشکالی نداره. فقط بااحتیاط رانندگی کن. منتظرت میمونم. #English #traffic #مکالمه_انگلیسی #سفر #ترافیک #آموزش_زبان 🚦@Englishwith_hadis
❤2✍1💯1
Signed hadis
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Englishwith_hadis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💬کدوم گزینه از نظر گرامری درسته🤔⁉️ 🔺 میدونی بانک کجاست؟!
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📌کدوم گزینه ترجمه درست «بهت گفتم که نری» ⁉️
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English with Hadis💚 👩🏻🏫” (@Englishwith_hadis), 220 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Englishwith_hadis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.