Channel
@EnglishtutorIam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
180subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002218666629 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EnglishtutorIam |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EnglishtutorIam |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 180 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 181 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 182 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 183 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
376 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 134 | 35.6% | |
| ❤ | 115 | 30.6% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 16.0% | |
| ✍ | 16 | 4.26% | |
| 🎄 | 8 | 2.13% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 2.13% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 1.60% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.33% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.798% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.798% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.798% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.266% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Недавно в Википедии появилась отдельная статья про language learning misconceptions and myths (привет, учебник Speakout Advanced 😇) Один из самых популярных мифов : «дети учат язык быстрее». Да, у детей есть важный бонус: если начать достаточно рано, выше шанс сформировать близкое к нативному произношение. Но взрослые вовсе не обречены учить язык «хуже». Они просто учат его по-другому, опираясь на опыт, логику, осо…
❤9💯5👍4👏1🔥1
Утка или собака? Существует мнение, что во взрослом возрасте сложно усвоить нюансы произношения, и возникает логичный вопрос: а стоит ли вообще? По разным оценкам, родными носителями английского являются около 20-25% всех пользователей языка, тогда как 75-80% используют его как международный язык (lingua franca). То есть в реальной жизни мы чаще общаемся не с нейтивами, а с такими же изучающими. Нужно ли тогда стр…
🔥8👍5❤4✍1👀1
Happy upcoming New Year! May all your wishes come true -and yes, you'll do it!
❤22🎄4🤓4
✍️Давно я не предлагала порешать никакого тестика. Пусть это будут маленькие сленговые словечки. Итак 1. Swag He walks into the room with so much swag. a) харизма b) много денег c) обман Правильно: a) харизма, уверенность, «крутость». Слово swag сегодня чаще всего означает стиль, самоуверенность, харизму. См. словарь Merriam-Webster: При этом те, кто выбрал вариант «много денег», не совсем неправы: в первом, уже…
🔥10❤5👍4🎄3
Do you know what '67' ('six-seven') means? It's also a word of the year by Dictionary.com So, what does 67 mean? Well…it’s complicated. Some say it means “so-so,” or “maybe this, maybe that,” or sometimes just nothing.
🔥7❤5👀2👍1😁1
🎄The top ten greatest Christmas movies. Если уже хочется начать смотреть рождественско-новогодние истории для создания настроения, то вот мой wishlist на этот новый год. 5 фильмов я смотрела, 5 еще только собираюсь. Mary Poppins (1964). Фильм удостоен 5 премий «Оскар». Классический фильм, традиционный для просмотра на Рождество в Великобритании. Mary Poppins Returns (2018). Для любителей продолжения, сильный актерск…
❤5🔥3☃2🎄1
Слово года: Parasocial Cambridge dictionary назвал словом 2025 года parasocial и определяет его так: “A term for the one-sided emotional bond people form with celebrities or fictional characters, now extended to AI.” То есть, это характеристика односторонней эмоциональной связи, при которой человек испытывает чувство близости, доверия или привязанности к субъекту, не способному ответить взаимной, симметричной связь…
❤6🔥5👍4
Rage bait встречается не только в медиа и рекламе: студенты тоже иногда, осознанно или нет, используют его в академических работах, особенно в эссе. Чаще всего это проявляется в слишком резких, обобщающих или провокационных утверждениях в начале текста, цель которых не столько проанализировать проблему, сколько зацепить читателя эмоционально. Примеры: Modern education is a complete failure and only makes students…
👍7✍3👏2🥰2
Не могу удержаться и не прокомментировать rage bait. Когда разговор заходит о рекламе, например, мы все понимаем глубокую манипулятивность её природы. То, что нам предъявляют, чаще всего является хорошо продуманной стратегией, целью которой является привлечение внимания и «расшевеливание» аудитории. Если разжечь любопытство самый безобидный по сути приём, то игра на более сложных чувствах, например, на чувстве спр…
🔥10🤯4👍3
Oxford Dictionary объявил слово года : им стало rage bait, что дословно переводится как «приманка для ярости» (по аналогии с clickbeit, но пишется в два слова). Очевидно, это слово описывает ставшую распространённой практику привлечения внимания к контенту за счёт провокации негативных эмоций, таких как возмущение и гнев. В shortlist попали еще aura farming (создание привлекательного публичного образа) и biohack (п…
🔥7✍5👀3👾2
Where do you live? Is it a comfortable place? Do you live in a big city or a small town? These are typical questions in IELTS Speaking Part 1, and if you’d like to practise talking about them, let me invite you to join tomorrow’s Speaking Club session! ✨ Free admission - everyone is welcome. 📌 Click the link to join the Speaking Club and access the Zoom invitation. Looking forward to seeing you there!
❤7🔥5✍2
Intuition or gut feeling? Говорят, сердце чувствует. Но на самом деле: чует. В русском языке есть слово "чуйка" - почти животное чувство опасности, способность молниеносно собирать сигналы глазами, ушами, носом, кожей и всем телом. А потом спрашиваешь себя: «Но как я это поняла?» Почуяла. Проинтуичила. Сработала интуиция. А что в английском? Кроме 'intuition', как еще можно об этом сказать? Основное выражение : gu…
❤9👍5🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EnglishtutorIam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Tutor, I am” (@EnglishtutorIam), 180 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EnglishtutorIam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.